Reconstruct - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: reconstruct Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 77 results (0.012 seconds)Santoshi Tel Utpadak Kendra Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax and A ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-24-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC1617b; 1983(13)ELT1651(SC); 1981(3)SCALE1094; (1981)3SCC466; [1982]1SCR97; [1981]48STC248(SC); 1981(13)LC810(SC)
..... company shall not be wound up voluntarily except for the purpose of effecting amalgamation or reconstruction of a company on the ground that by reason of its liability it cannot continue ..... a voluntary winding up under the insurance act occurs for the purpose of effecting a reconstruction or amalgamation or on the ground that a company cannot continue its business be cause .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.P. Lonappan and Sons Vs. S. Mohamed Iqbal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-20-1981
Reported in: AIR1981Mad238
..... the witness box to substantiate his bona fides in claiming the building for demolition and reconstruction the appellate authority has taken into consideration the age of the building the resources of ..... the building and have correctly come to the conclusion that the building requires demolition and reconstruction as regards the resources of the landlord to construct the building and the preparation he .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTO.R. Seshadri and ors. Vs. B. Sundarsana Gupta
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-04-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Mad23
..... resisted these applications contending that the respondent had no intention of either demolishing or reconstructing the building and that the respondent had also not secured the necessary plans and ..... deserve demolition and that the respondent bona fide required the premises for demolition and reconstruction on these con collusions the applications for eviction were ordered aggrieved by this the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahalakshmi Metal Industries Vs. K. Suseela Devi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-14-1981
Reported in: (1982)2MLJ333
..... of the building and the extent to which it could stand without immediate demolition and reconstruction in future would be a totally irrelevant factor while determining the bona fide requirement of ..... conversely a landlord being possessed of sufficient means to undertake the project of demolition and reconstruction by itself may not be sufficient to establish his bona fide requirement if the building .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArumugam Vs. D.R. Srinivasan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-23-1981
Reported in: (1982)2MLJ298
..... respondent landlord filed an application for diction on the ground of requirement for demolition and reconstruction under section 14 1 b of the tamil nadu buildings lease and rent control act ..... the requirement is not bona fide and that the building does not require demolition and reconstruction the rent controller appointed an advocate commissioner to find out the condition of the building .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ. Hiralal Vs. Corporation of the City of Bangalore and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-12-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Kant137; 1981(2)KarLJ437
..... an application to the commissioner in writing for a licence or permission to construct or reconstruct his building section 299 requires the applicant to produce along with his application a site ..... act regulating the grant and issue of licences to an owner either for construction or reconstruction do not empower or provide for issue of notices consideration of objections or even physical .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCity of Memphis Vs. Greene
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1981
..... e mcpherson the political history of the united states of america during the period of reconstruction 29 44 1871 footnote 2 6 respondents suggest that certain of the discriminations with which ..... a badge or incident of slavery at least as those terms were understood by the reconstruction congress when the thirteenth amendment was being debated supporters and opponents alike acknowledged that it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMunicipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and anr. Vs. Vijay Metal Works
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-13-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Bom6; 1981MhLJ798
..... the respondents for eviction on the ground that mahalaxmi bridge at bombay was to be reconstructed and those premises which are in the shape or arches at the junction of clark ..... a false ground and pretext that they were required to be evicted because of the reconstruction of mahalaxmi bridge however since they were not under the mahalaxmi bridge the enquiries were .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Aluminium Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-15-1981
Reported in: [1983]140ITR114(Cal)
..... the new unit was formed not by splitting up or by reconstruction of the existing unit also submitted that the buildings or machinery ..... the new unit was not formed by splitting up or by reconstruction of the existing unit also submitted that the building or machinery ..... the new unit was not formed by splitting up or by reconstruction of the existing unit also submitted that the buildings or machinery .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurinder Nath Vs. P.N. Dhawan
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-19-1981
Reported in: AIR1981HP68
..... led any evidence to show that he had sufficient means for reconstructing the building it also held that the premises in dispute ..... shri surjit singh had been engaged by the landlord for the reconstruction of this building it may be that the building has outlived ..... since the building had outlived its life and that the proposed reconstruction could not be carried out without the respondent s vacating his .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial