Skip to content

Did you mean: recognizable?


Recognizability - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: recognizability Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 13 results (0.006 seconds)
May 14 2002 (TRI)

Bharat Agri. Implements and Vs. C.C.E., Jaipur-ii

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-14-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC53Tri(Delhi)

..... on the ship under item 68 of central excise tariff therefore the inputs are clearly recognizable as non duty paid for the purpose of this notification 208 83 the condition laid ..... units was on the ship and not on the scrap and the scrap was clearly recognizable as non duty paid for the purpose of notification no 208 83 notification no 386 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 09 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex., Vadodara Vs. Adarsh Re-rolling Mills

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-09-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC808Tri(Delhi)

..... this notification all stocks of inputs in the country except such stocks as are clearly recognizable as being non duty paid or charged to nil rate of duty shall be deemed ..... locomotive engines however there is no specific evidence that they are inputs which are clearly recognizable as non duty paid or charged to nil rate of duty 11 as against the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 26 2002 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hydle Constructions Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-26-2002

Reported in: [2003]259ITR344(Delhi)

..... of twenty persons without the aid of power have been employed such a new industrially recognizable unit of an assessed cannot be said to be reconstruction of his old business since .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 26 2002 (HC)

Cit Vs. Hydle Constructions (P) Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-26-2002

Reported in: (2002)178CTR(Del)119

..... of twenty persons without the aid of power have been employed such a new industrially recognizable unit of an assessed cannot be said to be reconstruction of his old business since .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 27 2002 (FN)

Zelman Vs. Simmons-harris

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-27-2002

..... immigrant groups are expressing their christianity in languages customs and independent churches that are barely recognizable and often controversial for europeanancestry catholics and protestants h ebaugh j chafetz religion and the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 2002 (HC)

Nalgonda District Oil Millers Association, Nalgonda Vs. Government of ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-06-2002

Reported in: 2002(3)ALD538

..... and no employee who is suffering from hand or face injury skin infection or clinically recognizable infectious disease shall be permitted to work in the factory as per clause 5 3 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 19 2002 (HC)

Manmohan Singh and anr. Vs. Joginder Kaur and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-19-2002

Reported in: 2002(64)DRJ293

..... property is transferred in his name 54 i am afraid such a defense is not recognizable in law the doctrine that in case of onerous bequest the legaty can have whole .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 17 2002 (TRI)

Lucky Steel Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-17-2002

Reported in: (2003)(152)ELT99TriDel

..... the notification all stocks of inputs in the country except such stocks as are clearly recognizable as being non duty paid shall be deemed to be inputs on which duty has .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 31 2002 (TRI)

Sara Services and Engineers Pvt. Vs. Commr. of Cus. (icd)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-31-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC6690Tri(Delhi)

..... is made by forging is in that sense a forged article it is also clearly recognizable part of machinery for transmission of power pie also mentioned that the said decision has .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 05 2002 (HC)

N. Krishna Reddy and ors. Vs. N. Sharadabai and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-05-2002

Reported in: 2002(3)ALD118; 2002(5)ALT146

..... claiming through him that there was an oral partition not followed up by any events recognizable in law it will be difficult to accept such a statement on the other hand .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //