Recognizability - Judgment Search Results

Indian Plastics Ltd. and Indian Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(70)ECC242

..... said order which reads as under i the words inputs are clearly recognizable as being not duty paid comprehend all inputs on which it ..... has already availed credit the second exception is where the inputs are recognizable as being non duty paid or charged to nil rate of ..... stated with certainty that the inputs are wholly exempt or are clearly recognizable as non duty paid or charged to nil rate of duty .....

Suraj Steel Rolling Mills Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT353TriDel

..... would be available to the appellants only if those were duty paid and were not recognizable as non duty paid he directed the assistant collector to revise the demand accordingly he ..... on the inputs procured from the open market only when the same were not clearly recognizable as non duty paid and that the duty demand has to be redetermined with reference .....

Varsha Steel Rolling Mills (P) Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2002)(145)ELT79Tri(Chennai)

..... purchased from the market however the notification does not apply to those inputs which are recognizable as non duty paid the tribunal in the case of cce guntur v choday apparaw .....

Erie Vs. Pap's A.andnbsp;M.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and insist that both aims are equally unrelated to speech simply because erie might have recogniz ed that it could possibly have had either aim in mind see ante at 295 .....

Hill Vs. Colorado

Court: US Supreme Court

..... simply by averting their eyes cohen v california 403 u s 15 21 1971 the recognizable privacy interest in avoiding unwanted communication varies widely in different settings it is far less .....

Williams Vs. Taylor, Warden

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 143 f 3d at 870 the statutory text likewise does not obviously prescribe a specific recognizable standard of review for dealing with either phrase significantly it does not use any term .....

C. Prakash Agarwal and ors. Vs. State of A.P.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(2)ALD(Cri)195; 2000CriLJ4310

..... 445 cr p c section 445 cr p c lays down 445 deposit instead of recognizance when any person is required by any court or officer to execute a bond with .....

Bagaria Vegetables Products Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Aurangabad Municipa ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(2)ALLMR136; 2001(2)BomCR746

..... said to be entitled for refund of the octroi duty there is in our opinion recognizable difference in the word consumption as is used under the provisions of the sales tax .....

Ahir Nimeshkumar Babubhai Vs. South Gujarat University

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2001)4GLR3577

..... reassessment and therefore the resultant fact situation in such a case would never constitute a recognizable or cognizable right or empowerment 4 that there was no question of giving any opportunity ..... reassessment and therefore the resultant fact situation in such a case would never constitute a recognizable or cognizable right or empowerment 6 it is admitted by the petitioner in the application .....