Received By - Judgment Search Results

Official Receiver, Kanpur and anr. Vs. Abdul Shakur and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC920; [1965]1SCR254

the claims of the respondents 1 to 3. He held that it was not proved that Kotwaleshwar had received consideration for the three promissory notes. In the view of the Official Receiver the documentary evidence produced by

Receivable Management Services India Pvt. Ltd. and a Vs. ............. ...

Court: Delhi

Petitioner Companies and the Scheme of Amalgamation needs to be sanctioned by this Court.11. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamationfrom any other party. In this regard, Mr. Vikas Goel, Advocate of the Petitioner

In reference received from Sessions Judge, Narsinghpur (M.P) and Anoth ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

conduct of the appellant is established by these two witnesses to show his guilty conscious that when he received an information that a dog was being called by the Police for smelling purpose, he immediately left the

The Court Receiver, High Court, as Receiver of the Business and Assets ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(3)ALLMR873; 2003(5)BomCR501; 2003(27)PTC555(Bom); [2003]45SCL335(Bom)

suits to collect or obtain possession of the property must be prosecuted by the receiver, and the proceeds received and controlled by him alone. If the suit has to be nominally prosecuted in the name of the

Official Receiver, Prakasham District Vs. Varra Nagi Reddy and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1998(1)ALD151; 1997(6)ALT623

E.A.No.509 of 1997 in E,P.No.20 of 1994 connected with O.S.No-12 of 1987 is challenged.2. Petitioner is the Official Receiver of Prakasham district. He filed an application to stop the sale of the schedule property which was brought

Official Receiver Vs. G. Prabhavathi and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1997(2)ALT91

E.P.No.27 of 1987. The 5th respondent herein filed I.P.No.6 of 1989 and the petitioner was appointed as interim receiver on 26-10-1989 and he took possession of the property on 9-2-1990. Respondents 1 to 4 brought the properties

The Official Receiver Vs. Ariya Boyan S/O. Veera Boyan

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1995)2MLJ537

Namakkal. The insolvency court allowed the petition and the estate of the insolvents was vested with the Official Receiver. While so, the respondents filed I.A. No. 123 of 1984 under Section 28(5) of the Provincial Insolvency Act,

Official Receiver, Representing the Estate of the Debtors in I.P. No. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1995)2MLJ264

at liberty to stand in the creditor's shoes until every six pence of the whole debt has been received by the creditors.Section 129 of the Indian Contract Act defines a continuing guarantee. In view of the peculiar words

The Official Receiver Vs. R. Annamalai and 2 ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1996(2)CTC536; (1996)IMLJ47

of rent and on the ground of denial of title of the landlord by the tenant. The Official Receiver, North Arcot Ambedkar District and Timvannamalai Sambuvarayar District at Vellore filed an application for impleading him as a

Court Receiver, High Court Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1982(1)BomCR564

as to what is the effect of non-compliance of the notice by Mr. G.V. Puranik. Assuming that notice received by the Receiver was under section 9(3), (4) there could be no dispute that the Receiver had given particulars