Skip to content


Reasonably - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: reasonably Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 10,120 results (0.212 seconds)
Jan 04 2000 (TRI)

S. Kumars Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-04-2000

Reported in: (2000)(117)ELT439TriDel

..... appellant to effectively defend his case the matter is required to be reconsidered for this reason also 13 the assessee s representation regarding treating the gross realisation as cum duty is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 2000 (TRI)

S.M.M. Steel Re-rolling Mills (P) Vs. Commissioner of Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: May-25-2000

Reported in: (2001)(130)ELT897Tri(Chennai)

..... attendant order in original suffer from violation of principles of natural justice because of two reasons a the reliance by revenue on a technical opinion of an engineer of tamil nadu .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 30 2000 (TRI)

Paras Prints Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-30-2000

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT662Tri(Mum.)bai

..... applicable in those cases where there has been a short levy or non levy by reasons of any of the facts suppression etc specified in that proviso the duty payable on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 30 2000 (TRI)

S.K.N. Gas Appliances Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-30-2000

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT732TriDel

..... them 9 in the result we set aside the impugned order for all the above reasons and allow the appeals with consequential relief

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 2000 (TRI)

Asjaypee International Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: May-29-2000

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT1015Tri(Chennai)

..... we find that the order impugned is a non speaking order because of the following reasons a the enhancement of value from rs 30 per kg to rs 32 per kg .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 2000 (TRI)

Wood Fun Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2000

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT495TriDel

..... officer after some time in the meantime the appeal was dismissed in view of the reasons explained in the application the application is allowed and the final order no 1105 99 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 26 2000 (TRI)

R.R. Enterprises Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-26-2000

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT665Tri(Mum.)bai

..... equipment the customs department refused to accept that these licences cover import of goods the reasons which are cited in the notice to show cause proposing confiscation which is reflected in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 2000 (TRI)

Commr. of C. Ex. Vs. Economic Pharmaceuticals (P)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-25-2000

Reported in: (2000)(72)ECC488

..... 2000 and every time notice of hearing has been returned undelivered hence we see no reason to keep the matter pending any further therefore we heard the learned dr and perused .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 2000 (TRI)

Refco and Wessamat Appliances Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-25-2000

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT493TriDel

..... to evade payment of duty if ignorance of law or misunderstanding of law was the reason for non payment of duty such ignorance and misunderstanding would not be localised and the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Charak Pharmaceuticals

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-01-2000

Reported in: (2001)(127)ELT748Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the case since the cost of the goods sold is known and there is no reason as to why that cost should not be applied we are unable to uphold the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //