Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: railways act 1989 chapter 5 opening of railways Page 5 of about 44,392 results (0.502 seconds)

Feb 01 2000 (HC)

Amrendra Nath Singh Vs. Bar Council of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2000All224; (2000)1UPLBEC825

..... writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to notify and invited objection in preparation of electoral roll as contemplated under the rule 4 of chapter i of the rules framed by bar council of india.(b) to issue a writ, order or direction in other nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to revise the ..... required in the notice under rule 4 of these rules within the time specified shall be deemed to have committed an act of other misconduct as referred to in section 35(1) of the act.'2o. rule 1 of chapter i provides that every advocate whose name is on the electoral roll of state council shall be entitled to vote at ..... not given intimation of resumption of practice;(h) if he has not paid the subscription under rule 40 chapter-ii, part vi of the rules and obtained receipt from the state bar council;(i) he has incurred any disqualification mentioned in the act or the rules made thereunder. (this rule will not apply to the elections for which the processes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 1988 (SC)

State of Kerala and ors. Vs. K.G. Madhavan Pillai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1989SC49; JT1988(4)SC613; 1989(1)KLT141(SC); 1988(2)SCALE1247; (1988)4SCC669; [1988]Supp3SCR94

..... for fulfilment of various conditions has not been reached and therefore it was directing 'the state to proceed to take the further steps commencing from rule 11, chapter v of the k.e.r.' in view of this categoric finding and since it is the admitted position that the government have not subjectively scrutinised the application ..... by quashing ex. p-7 and directing the government to proceed further with the applications in order to see whether permission could be granted under rule 11 of chapter v.10. in the light of these conflicting arguments what falls for consideration in these appeals may broadly be enunciated under the following heads:(1) whether any ..... provides that all rules made under the act shall be laid before the legislative assembly for its approval.4. in exercise of its powers under section 36, the government have framed rules and they have been approved by the legislature. though the rules contain several chapters, we need look only into chapter v and the relevant rules therein. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 1986 (SC)

Tej Pal Singh Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC1814; 1986(2)SCALE176; (1986)3SCC604; [1986]3SCR428; 1986(3)SLJ72(SC)

..... rule cannot cover a case where any order was passed in complete disregard of the rules contained in chapter iii: but an irregularity committed in good faith shall not invalidate the order. the principles governing the provisions like section 5 of the limitation act can easily be made applicable to a case of the present nature. where two opinions are possible, the ..... . the material part of chapter iii is set out below :chapter iiiexecutive and administrative business of the court1. subject to these rules, a committee of judges composed of the chief justice, the judge in the administrative department and five other judges to be appointed by the chief justice, referred to in these rules as the administrative committee, shall act for the court. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 1992 (HC)

A.R. Kukalekar Vs. Goa Housing Board and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR486

..... instance, the post held by a permanent servant is abolished, or the whole of the cadre to which the post belonged is brought to an end and the railway servant's are services terminated in consequence, that cannot amount his removal because the termination of his service is not based on any consideration personal to the servant. ..... provisions of rule 10 as is sought to be suggested by mr. nadkarni. in craie's statute law, seventh edition in chapter 5, at page 64 it is stated that where the words of an act are clear, there is no need for applying any of the principles of interpretation which are merely presumptions in cases of ambiguity ..... it appears from the duties entrusted, was placed higher in rank to the chief accounts officer. petitioner (originally) was an employee of the government. on 23rd february, 1989 he was transferred to the first respondent on deputation as chief accounts officers. he was thereafter promoted as financial controller. on 1st of february, 1990 he was absorbed with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 1976 (HC)

The Associated Cotton Traders Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uo ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1977)2MLJ335

..... 82-j come within this chapter. section 73 makes the railway administration liable for loss, destruction, damage or deterioration, or non-delivery of goods or animals, while in transit, except for ..... to the negligence or failure or the railway administration to take sufficient care of the goods, which they were bound to take under the statute, and whether the respondent railway, had discharged their duty as contemplated under sections 73, 77 and 78 of the indian railways act.10. chapter vii of the indian railways act deals with the responsibility of the railway administration as carriers. sections 72 to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2004 (HC)

Tamil Nadu Highways Roadways Employees' Association, (Regn. No. 97/200 ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2004)4MLJ335

..... where the question arose as to whether a project called 'righand nagar project' of the indian railway construction company limited would fall within the definition of 'industrial establishment' governed by chapter v-b of the industrial disputes act and consequently, the workmen concerned therein would be covered by section 25(n) sub section (1) ..... than one hundred workmen were employed on an average per working day for the preceding twelve months to the date of retrenchment, chapter v- b of the industrial disputes act also get attracted. the learned counsel would further contend that inasmuch as, no prior permission of the government or such authority ..... 1999)illj317sc (lal mohammad and others versus indian railway construction co.ltd. and others)', the hon'ble supreme court dealt with a case of an establishment to which, chapter v-b of the industrial disputes act was applicable and since compliance with the provisions of the said chapter was not resorted to while effecting the retrenchment, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 1963 (SC)

Raichand Amulakh Shah Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1964SC1268; (1964)66BOMLR315; 1964MhLJ426(SC); [1964]5SCR148

..... . the bar is in respect of anything done or an omission made by the railway administration in violation or contravention of any provisions of chapter v of the act. if the opening words 'except as provided in this act' in s. 26 of the act are ignored, the bar appears to be comprehensive, for it may take in its ..... sweep any dereliction of duty by the railway administration in respect of matters covered by the provisions of the said chapter. but such an intention to give a blanket licence to the railway administration to contravene the provisions of chapter v of the act shall not be attributed to the legislature unless the section is ..... , and of any services rendered thereat.' 7. section 26. 'except as provided in this act, no suit shall be instituted or proceeding taken for anything done or any omission made by a railway administration in violation or contravention of any provision of this chapter (ch. v.).' 8. section 32. 'the central government may, by general or special .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2013 (HC)

Indian Nval Canteen Service Employees Un Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

..... 12 and it is held as under: "25. since in terms of the rules made by the state governments under section 46 of the act, it is obligatory on the railway administration to provide a canteen, and the canteens in question have been established pursuant to the said provision there is no difficulty in holding that ..... consider the defence taken by the 5th respondent, especially regarding the scope of interference that is possible in the matter. it is not in dispute that as per chapter xxviii of the incs regulations provides for the establishment of canteens. clause 2802 (1) clearly provides that government of india does not accept responsibility for the business ..... that the same will be laid down by the board from time to time. provisions are made for annual increment, leave, commuted leave and other benefits. chapter vii deals with the conduct and discipline. the appointing authority in respect of the various posts are specifically described. the board is the appointing authority as far as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 1985 (HC)

Director of Railway Movement (Coal) Eastern Railways, Calcutta Vs. Aka ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1985All314

..... the bar is in respect of anything done or an omission made by the railway administration in violation or contravention of any provisions of chapter v of the act. if the opening words 'except as provided in this act' in section 26 of the act are ignored, the bar appears to be comprehensive, for it may take in ..... of jurisdiction of ordinary courts in certain matters :-- except as provided in this act, no suit shall be instituted or proceeding taken for anything done or any omission made by a railway administration in violation or contravention of any provision of this chapter.' 12. chapter v wherein this section falls comprises of sections 26 to 46-c. in substance ..... its sweep any dereliction of duty by the railway administration in respect of matters covered by the provisions of the said chapter. but such an intention to give a blanket licence to the railway administration to contravene the provisions of chap. v of the act shall not be attributed to the legislature unless the section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2007 (SC)

Lal Mohammad and ors. Vs. Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC2230; [2007(112)FLR847]; JT2007(2)SC458; 2007(2)SCALE138; (2007)2SCC513; 2007AIRSCW3901; 2007ILLJ773(SC)

..... more remains to be res integra as it has been conclusively held by this court in aforesaid judgment that section 25-n is applicable that means chapter v-b of the act is applicable to this dispute. now, the question before us at present is whether the findings given by the full bench on the questions framed ..... 21 of the constitution of india, an additional ground was taken that the respondents had illegally invoked the provisions of chapter v-a of the industrial disputes act, 1947 but in fact chapter v-b of the said act applies as more than hundred workmen were being employed by the respondent company and therefore, retrenchment of the petitioners was ..... pointed out before this court that work of all railway lines is over and only small maintenance work pursuant to the agreement with the railway authorities is being undertaken. but in substance the whole work is complete. this court observed that since provisions of chapter v-b of the act are applicable and the procedure of section 25-o .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //