Court : Karnataka
..... would submit that only with the intention of protecting the property as otherwise, it may frustrate the proceedings, the safeguard is provided under chapter iii. the authorities who act under chapter iii are only statutory trustees who would preserve the property. by drawing the attention of the court to section 8(3), he would ..... money laundering. (c) the financial action task force established at the summit of seven major industrial nations, held in paris from 14th to 16th july, 1989 to examine the problem of money laundering has made forty recommendations, which provide the foundation material for comprehensive legislation to combat the problem of money laundering. ..... and adherence to the statement.35. the financial action task force (fatf) is an inter-governmental body established at g-7 summit in paris in 1989 with the objective to set standards and promote effective implementation of legal, regulatory and operational measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing and other .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... would submit that only with the intention of protecting the property as otherwise, it may frustrate the proceedings, the safeguard is provided under chapter iii. the authorities who act under chapter iii are only statutory trustees who would preserve the property. by drawing the attention of the court to section 8(3), he would ..... money laundering. (c) the financial action task force established at the summit of seven major industrial nations, held in paris from 14th to 16th july, 1989 to examine the problem of money laundering has made forty recommendations, which provide the foundation material for comprehensive legislation to combat the problem of money laundering. ..... and adherence to the statement.35. the financial action task force (fatf) is an inter-governmental body established at g-7 summit in paris in 1989 with the objective to set standards and promote effective implementation of legal, regulatory and operational measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing and other .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... there is no sufficient ground for proceeding. in fact, this provision is akin to proviso to clause (b) of sub-section (5) of section 9 of klgp act-2011. 53.1 chapter xvi deals with 'commencement of proceedings before magistrates' and section 204 of 506 cr.p.c. enables a magistrate to issue summons or a warrant, as the case ..... or was incharge or is/was responsible for the company to conduct its business. these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of ..... of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m. sankaranarayanan vs. deputy commissioner, bangalore. 11.(1989) 4 scc630 shan sunder and others vs. state of haryana. 12.(1998) 5 scc343 state of haryana vs. brij lal muttal and others. 13.(2008) 5 scc662 s.k. alagh .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... there is no sufficient ground for proceeding. in fact, this provision is akin to proviso to clause (b) of sub-section (5) of section 9 of klgp act-2011. 53.1 chapter xvi deals with 'commencement of proceedings before magistrates' and section 204 of 506 cr.p.c. enables a magistrate to issue summons or a warrant, as the case ..... or was incharge or is/was responsible for the company to conduct its business. these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of ..... of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m. sankaranarayanan vs. deputy commissioner, bangalore. 11.(1989) 4 scc630 shan sunder and others vs. state of haryana. 12.(1998) 5 scc343 state of haryana vs. brij lal muttal and others. 13.(2008) 5 scc662 s.k. alagh .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... there is no sufficient ground for proceeding. in fact, this provision is akin to proviso to clause (b) of sub-section (5) of section 9 of klgp act-2011. 53.1 chapter xvi deals with 'commencement of proceedings before magistrates' and section 204 of 506 cr.p.c. enables a magistrate to issue summons or a warrant, as the case ..... or was incharge or is/was responsible for the company to conduct its business. these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of ..... of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m. sankaranarayanan vs. deputy commissioner, bangalore. 11.(1989) 4 scc630 shan sunder and others vs. state of haryana. 12.(1998) 5 scc343 state of haryana vs. brij lal muttal and others. 13.(2008) 5 scc662 s.k. alagh .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... there is no sufficient ground for proceeding. in fact, this provision is akin to proviso to clause (b) of sub-section (5) of section 9 of klgp act-2011. 53.1 chapter xvi deals with 'commencement of proceedings before magistrates' and section 204 of 506 cr.p.c. enables a magistrate to issue summons or a warrant, as the case ..... or was incharge or is/was responsible for the company to conduct its business. these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of ..... of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m. sankaranarayanan vs. deputy commissioner, bangalore. 11.(1989) 4 scc630 shan sunder and others vs. state of haryana. 12.(1998) 5 scc343 state of haryana vs. brij lal muttal and others. 13.(2008) 5 scc662 s.k. alagh .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... there is no sufficient ground for proceeding. in fact, this provision is akin to proviso to clause (b) of sub-section (5) of section 9 of klgp act-2011. 53.1 chapter xvi deals with 'commencement of proceedings before magistrates' and section 204 of 506 cr.p.c. enables a magistrate to issue summons or a warrant, as the case ..... or was incharge or is/was responsible for the company to conduct its business. these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of ..... of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m. sankaranarayanan vs. deputy commissioner, bangalore. 11.(1989) 4 scc630 shan sunder and others vs. state of haryana. 12.(1998) 5 scc343 state of haryana vs. brij lal muttal and others. 13.(2008) 5 scc662 s.k. alagh .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... there is no sufficient ground for proceeding. in fact, this provision is akin to proviso to clause (b) of sub-section (5) of section 9 of klgp act-2011. 53.1 chapter xvi deals with 'commencement of proceedings before magistrates' and section 204 of 506 cr.p.c. enables a magistrate to issue summons or a warrant, as the case ..... or was incharge or is/was responsible for the company to conduct its business. these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of ..... of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m. sankaranarayanan vs. deputy commissioner, bangalore. 11.(1989) 4 scc630 shan sunder and others vs. state of haryana. 12.(1998) 5 scc343 state of haryana vs. brij lal muttal and others. 13.(2008) 5 scc662 s.k. alagh .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... there is no sufficient ground for proceeding. in fact, this provision is akin to proviso to clause (b) of sub-section (5) of section 9 of klgp act-2011. 53.1 chapter xvi deals with 'commencement of proceedings before magistrates' and section 204 of 506 cr.p.c. enables a magistrate to issue summons or a warrant, as the case ..... or was incharge or is/was responsible for the company to conduct its business. these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of ..... of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m. sankaranarayanan vs. deputy commissioner, bangalore. 11.(1989) 4 scc630 shan sunder and others vs. state of haryana. 12.(1998) 5 scc343 state of haryana vs. brij lal muttal and others. 13.(2008) 5 scc662 s.k. alagh .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... there is no sufficient ground for proceeding. in fact, this provision is akin to proviso to clause (b) of sub-section (5) of section 9 of klgp act-2011. 53.1 chapter xvi deals with 'commencement of proceedings before magistrates' and section 204 of 506 cr.p.c. enables a magistrate to issue summons or a warrant, as the case ..... or was incharge or is/was responsible for the company to conduct its business. these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of ..... of m.p.9. (1982) 2 scc134 government of andhra pradesh vs. thummala krishna rao and another. 10.(2017) 13 scc661 m. sankaranarayanan vs. deputy commissioner, bangalore. 11.(1989) 4 scc630 shan sunder and others vs. state of haryana. 12.(1998) 5 scc343 state of haryana vs. brij lal muttal and others. 13.(2008) 5 scc662 s.k. alagh .....
Tag this Judgment!