Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: railways act 1989 chapter 5 opening of railways Court: uttaranchal Page 1 of about 36 results (0.061 seconds)

Upendra Singh Maniyari Vs. Jagmohan Singh and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... appellant before the supreme court, had made an anonymous complaint to the cbi alleging corrupt practices and financial irregularities on the part of some officers of the railway department. after holding a preliminary enquiry, the investigating officer expressed the view, that it was not necessary to register a first information report, on the subject ..... of a deputy superintendent of police contrary to the mandate of section 5(4) of the prevention of corruption act, 1947. while examining the scheme of chapter xiv of the code of criminal procedure, 1908 (same as chapter xii of the 1973 code), it was held that the investigation primarily consists of the ascertainment of the ..... ours)reference was then made to the decision in ratnagiri district central cooperative bank ltd. v. dinkar kashinath watve (civil appeal no. 520 of 1989, decided on 27.01.1989), wherein the apex court held as under:even when in the cause title of an application both article 226 and article 227 of the constitution have .....

Dr. Chitra Agarwal Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2006Utr78

..... in our view, the stand taken by the second respondent in annexure 5 communication is not correct or justified. chapter vii of the pndt act deals with the offences and penalties. section 22 in chapter vii deals with the prohibition of advertisement relating to pre-conception and pre-natal determination of sex and punishment for ..... the registration of the ultrasound centre and not against the owner of the centre. but criminal action is initiated for committing an offence under the pndt act and the action is directed against the person who committed the offence. both actions are independent and they can be proceeded with simultaneously. the pendency of ..... at 5 - new road, dehradun. the said ultrasound centre has been registered under the preconception and pre-natal diagonostic techniques (prohibition of sex selection) act, 1994 (for short pndt act). according to the petitioner, the registration certificate bears no. a/cmo/16 dated 10-12-2001. the grievance of the petitioner in this writ .....

Sister Superior Clementine. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and Another.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... and trial of such of offences and penalties thereof. by section 10 of the act of 1948, which defines the restrictions on rights of landlord, or persons claiming through landlord to cut and ..... fencing, bridges and culverts, dams, waterholes, trench marks, boundary marks, pipelines or other like purposes. 3a. penalty for contravention of the provisions of the act. whoever contravenes or abets the contravention of any of the provisions of section 2, shall be punishable with simple imprisonment for a period which may extend to ..... act, section 6 defines the restrictions on rights to cut, collect, to remove timber, etc. from domestic or agricultural needs, section 7 defines restrictions on rights to reclaim forest for purposes of cultivation and section 9 defines certain persons not to sell or transfer timber cut in any forest while section 15 defines that the offences under this chapter .....

Nandan Singh Rawat Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... the armed forces tribunal, are mandatory to stand transferred to the armed forces tribunal on the date on which the tribunal was constituted. section 34 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 is being reproduced hereunder:34. transfer of pending cases.-(1) every suit, or other proceeding pending before any court including a high court or other authority immediately before ..... the date of establishment of the tribunal under this act, being a suit or proceeding the cause of action whereon it is based, is such that it would have been within the jurisdiction of the tribunal, if it had arisen ..... be deemed to be a criminal court for the purpose of sections 175, 178, 179, 180, 193, 195, 196 or 228 of the indian penal code (45 of 1860)and chapter xxvi of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974).2. but then in terms of section 34 of the armed forces tribunal .....

Capt. V.N. Saxena Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... the armed forces tribunal, are mandatory to stand transferred to the armed forces tribunal on the date on which the tribunal was constituted. section 34 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 is being reproduced hereunder:34. transfer of pending cases.--(1) every suit, or other proceeding pending before any court including a high court or other authority immediately before ..... the date of establishment of the tribunal under this act, being a suit or proceeding the cause of action whereon it is based, is such that it would have been within the jurisdiction of the tribunal, if it had ..... be deemed to be a criminal court for the purpose of sections 175, 178, 179, 180, 193, 195, 196 or 228 of the indian penal code (45 of 1860)and chapter xxvi of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974).2. but then in terms of section 34 of the armed forces tribunal .....

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... mentioned that during the relevant period (1988) no service tax was enforced. it was in 1994 that service tax was levied for the first time as per chapter v of the finance act, 1994. section 66 thereof created charge of service tax in regard to taxable services. 'service tax' is defined in clause (34) of section 65 to ..... union or of any other force subject to the control of the union or of any contingent or unit thereof in aid of the civil power.'2. police (including railway and village police) subject to the provisions of entry 2a of list i.12. libraries, museums and other similar institutions controlled or financed by the state; ancient and ..... 'aspects' doctrine. that doctrine merely deals with legislative competence. as has been succinctly stated in federation of hotel & restaurant asson. of india v. union of india : (1989) 3 scc 634.subjects which in one aspect and for one purpose fall within the power of a particular legislature may in another aspect and for another purpose fall within .....

Chief Engineer Central Zone Telecommunication Civil and ors. Vs. Dayal ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2005Utr34; 2005(2)ARBLR520(Uttaranchal)

..... is higher, the mandatory injunction has been issued for which only rupees 500/- is maximum court fees. injunctions are issued under the specific relief act, 1963. section 39, contained in chapter viii of said act, which deals with the mandatory injunctions, reads as under : '39. mandatory injunctions -when, to prevent the breach of obligations, it is ..... the m/s. dayal construction (plaintiff/decree holders) drew my attention to para 9 of judgment passed in vishwanath sood v. union of india air 1989 sc 952, and contended that the opening expression 'except where otherwise provided in the contract in clause 25 of the agreement excludes the jurisdiction of the ..... the plaintiffs entered into an agreement with union of india (defendant/judgment debtor) for construction of inspection quarters being constructed between a period from 6-12-1989 to 5-5-1991. as per the plaint allegations, plaintiffs were obliged to start the execution of the work only after pre-requisite conditions contained in .....

Singh and Company Vs. Collector

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2005Utr76

..... no. 673 of 2001 has been preferred by the collector, nainital (respondent in first appeal no. 175 of 2001) against the aforesaid judgment and award dated 30-5-1989 passed in l.a. case no. 104 of 1983 for setting aside the order passed by the iii additional district judge, nainital and further to confirm the award given ..... they are being decided by this common judgment.2. first appeal no. 175 of 2001 has been preferred by the claimant/appellant against the judgment and award dated 30-5-1989 passed by the iii additional district judge, nainital in land acquisition case no. 104 of 1983, singh and company v. collector, nainital, whereby the reference made by the ..... purpose of calculating the market value as contemplated under section 23 of the act which pari materia spirits and attracts the provisions of the rules contained under chapter 15 of the stamp rules, hence the rates fixed by the collector under the rules of the stamp act would be as a reasonable basis for the calculation of the value of .....

Smt. Tripta Sunita Singh and ors. Vs. Habil D. Singh and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : [2007(114)FLR1181]

..... meaning of the provisions of section 2 (n) of the workmen's compensation act.section 2 (n) of the workmen's compensation act reads as under:2(1) (n) 'workman' means any person who is:(i) a railway servant as defined in section 3 of the indian railways act, 1890 (9 of 1890), not permanently employed in any administrative, district or ..... sub-divisional office of a railway and not employed in any such capacity as is specified in schedule ii,(ia) (a) *** ***(b) *** ***(c) ..... workman by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, his employer shall be liable to pay compensation in accordance with the provisions of this chapter:provided that the employer shall not be so liable-(a) in respect of any injury which does not result in the total or partial disablement of the workman .....

NaraIn Singh Alias Nary Vs. the State of U.P.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... smt. bani devi smt. bimla devi were charged under section 396 of the i.p.c. vide order dated 18th may 1989. charge under section 3 and 7 of the u.p. protection of civil rights act, 1955 was framed against accused mor singh alias bangoliya, guthiaru alias kor singh and surat singh. they have been separately tried vide ..... sessions trial no. 44 of 1988 and sessions trial no. 8 of 1989. however, accusednarain singh (present appellant) alongwith smt. subda, smt. chandra ..... sessions trial no. 30 of 1990, whereas other co-accused were tried together in two separate trials i.e. sessions trial no. 44 of 1988 and 8 of 1989 and the trial court convicted accused mehar singh alias bhuria, surat singh, gabbar singh, pushkar singh, harish chandra, mor singh alias bangolia and guthiaru alias kaur singh under .....