Skip to content


Questionable - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: questionable Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.047 seconds)
Jan 02 1997 (TRI)

Aditi Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-02-1997

Reported in: (1998)(103)ELT412Tri(Mum.)bai

1 the question for decision in this appeal is whether membrane filter disc which the appellant contends was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 19 1997 (TRI)

Hyderabad Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-19-1997

Reported in: (1998)(97)ELT383TriDel

..... of the view as conceded by both sides during the hearing that this being a question of fact would have to be looked into by way of remand the actual character .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 23 1997 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Integrated Organic Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-23-1997

Reported in: (1999)(111)ELT882TriDel

..... as the amendment to the rule came only in january 1995 and the period in question is july 94 to oct 94 on this point no grounds have been raised the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 23 1997 (TRI)

Eagle Transport Services Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-23-1997

Reported in: (1997)(96)ELT469Tri(Mum.)bai

..... consignment this is in fact what happened with regard to the 3 shipping bills in question in which the consignmerits were misdeclared as polyester filament yarn shrimankar went a step further .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 23 1997 (TRI)

Jagajit Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-23-1997

Reported in: (1999)(107)ELT523TriDel

..... k srivastava sdr we do not find any justification for an adjournment 2 the only question arising for consideration relates to the interpretation to be placed on the explanation introduced by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 22 1997 (TRI)

Super Seals (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-22-1997

Reported in: (1997)(96)ELT54TriDel

1 in both these stay applications common question of law and facts are involved hence they are taken up together for disposal as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 19 1997 (TRI)

R.S.P. Woollen Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-19-1997

Reported in: (1998)(97)ELT109TriDel

..... credit and in this view we do not feel called upon to pronounce on the question raised by the respondent in the cross objection in the result the appeal filed by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 19 1997 (TRI)

Precision Tool Room Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-19-1997

Reported in: (1997)(96)ELT57TriDel

..... counsel for appellant touched upon various aspects having a bearing on the decision on the question of clubbing of clearances of more than one unit and submitted that the facts and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 18 1997 (TRI)

Leader Engineering Works Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-18-1997

Reported in: (1999)(110)ELT562TriDel

..... 262 in rg 23a pt ii account it was found that the gate pass in question did not contain the name and address and licence number pla number and name of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 26 1997 (TRI)

Spa Computers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Sep-26-1997

Reported in: (1999)(110)ELT689Tri(Chennai)

..... to before us issued by the various commis sionerates we notice that the item in question is being used as an adjunct with the computer for the purpose of the control .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //