Questionable - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: questionable Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.04 seconds)Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Standard Alkali
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-03-1986
Reported in: (1989)(43)ELT318TriDel
..... elt 386 arvind chemical industries bombay v collector of customs bombay in that case the question arose whether the chemical imported namely gamma picoline used in the manufacture of isonicotinic acid .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMehta Agencies Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation Through Its R ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-27-1986
Reported in: 1986(3)BomCR363
..... been confirmed by the employees insurance court m s mehta agencies appeal 2 the short question thrown up by this appeal is whether the establishment of m s mehta agencies are .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahendra Singh and anr. Vs. Jagirsingh and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-20-1986
Reported in: I(1987)ACC439
..... rs 13 500 as the appeal is restricted to rs 10 000 more the only question that arises for our determination is whether atleast to that extent the appellants are entitled .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Mandar Madhav Tambe and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-05-1986
Reported in: I(1987)ACC269
..... and united india insurance co ltd v tilak ram 1985 acj 481 7 this debated question therefore will have to be resolved by firstly finding out as to what is the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManu Bharati Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Inco ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-22-1986
Reported in: (1987)59CTR(Bom)226
masodkar j this appeal questions the eventual acquisition of property by the revenue respondent on the ground that conveyance deed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKirtilal Moolchand and Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-24-1986
Reported in: 1988(14)LC52(Bombay)
pendse j 1 the short question which falls for determination in this petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMavumkoottathil Subramanian Mohandasan Vs. State of Maharashtra and or ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-04-1986
Reported in: 1990(26)LC95(Bombay)
..... indulging in that activity if a person were bringing a contraband article openly and when questioned discloses the nature of the article carried by him it may indicate a state of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOswal Woollen Mills Ltd. and Vs. Union of India (Uoi),
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-06-1986
Reported in: 1988(15)LC128(Bombay)
..... ground that the applications were barred under section 27 1 of the customs act the question as to under what tariff item the goods imported by the petitioners fall is concluded .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. Ramjan Adbul Masalman
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-18-1986
Reported in: 1986(3)BomCR54
..... panchnama ex 5 during the cross examination he denied the suggestion that the property in question was scrap material belonging to the accused none of the panchas in whose presence the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBasavantappa Vs. Gangadhar Narayan Dharwadkar and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-26-1986
Reported in: [1986]59CompCas734(Kar); ILR1986KAR3003
..... these circumstances the order passed by the lower court setting aside the sale cannot be questioned 10 therefore the revision is dismissed no costs sections 49 b 143 1 a 143 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial