Put - Judgment Search Results
Smt. Putli Bibi Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-01-2004
Reported in: (2005)197CTR(All)134; [2005]279ITR294(All)
on behalf of the applicant on certain remuneration. The theory put forward that the applicant was an old lady and finding
None Has Put in Appearance on Behalf of Respondent Vs. Amrik Singh and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
of this document CWP No.8679 of 2013 -2- None has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2. It is grievance
Putli Bai Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-04-1984
Reported in: (1994)(69)ELT318TriDel
(a) the Appellant imported as many as 27 items - some of them in commercial quantities, e.g. baby garments 56...
Musammat Putli Kunwar Vs. Janki Das and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-20-1924
Reported in: AIR1924All850; 81Ind.Cas.294
safeguard the rights of the plaintiffs. Her case, as now, put, is that the plaintiffs still have access to the Avell
Put-in-bay Waterworks Co. Vs. Ryan
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-13-1901
Put-in-Bay Waterworks Co. v. Ryan - 181 U.S. 409 (1901) U.S.
State Vs. Bhupinder Singh @ Putli
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2009
Reported in: 2009CriLJ4248
evidence available on record against the respondent, Bhupinder Singh @ Putli to the following effect:i) Extra Judicial confession of co-accused Ajay
Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Smt. Chand Putli
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-12-1972
Reported in: AIR1973All362
K.B. Asthana, J.1. The plaintiff-respondent Smt. Chand Putli entered India on a Pakistani passport. She overstayed the term
Janki Das and ors. Vs. Putli Kunwar
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-20-1924
Reported in: (1924)ILR46All813
safeguard the rights of the plaintiffs. Her case, as now put, is that the plaintiffs still have access to the well
“The Applicants Are Directed to Put in Appearance Before the Vs. Sta ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-01-2013
investigation, the petitioners were found innocent and their names were put in Column No.2 of the final report. However, subsequent thereto,
Acquisition and Have Put in Appearance in Connected Cases No Vs. Sukh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
CWP No.10950 of 2013 and connected cases [2].acquisition and have put in appearance in connected cases, no separate notice needs to
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »