Put Up - Judgment Search Results
Smt. Putli Bibi Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-01-2004
Reported in: (2005)197CTR(All)134; [2005]279ITR294(All)
are partners and he was earlier realizing rent on behalf of the applicant on certain remuneration. The theory put forward that the applicant was an old lady and finding it difficult to realize rent from the tenant
None Has Put in Appearance on Behalf of Respondent Vs. Amrik Singh and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.8679 of 2013 -2- None has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2. It is grievance of the petitioners that respondent No.2- Gram Panchayat,
Putli Bai Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-04-1984
Reported in: (1994)(69)ELT318TriDel
(a) the Appellant imported as many as 27 items - some of them in commercial quantities, e.g. baby garments 56 pieces; (b) the goods would appear to have been detained for the purpose of payment of...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Musammat Putli Kunwar Vs. Janki Das and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-20-1924
Reported in: AIR1924All850; 81Ind.Cas.294
Court below were, not necessary in order to safeguard the rights of the plaintiffs. Her case, as now, put, is that the plaintiffs still have access to the Avell from the west and that the roofing over
Put-in-bay Waterworks Co. Vs. Ryan
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-13-1901
Put-in-Bay Waterworks Co. v. Ryan - 181 U.S. 409 (1901) U.S. Supreme Court Put-in-Bay Waterworks Co. v. Ryan, 181
State Vs. Bhupinder Singh @ Putli
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2009
Reported in: 2009CriLJ4248
sustainable because the investigation reveals that there is evidence available on record against the respondent, Bhupinder Singh @ Putli to the following effect:i) Extra Judicial confession of co-accused Ajay Luthra-Accused Ajay Luthra confessed before witness Sh. Anand
Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Smt. Chand Putli
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-12-1972
Reported in: AIR1973All362
K.B. Asthana, J.1. The plaintiff-respondent Smt. Chand Putli entered India on a Pakistani passport. She overstayed the term of her visa at Agra. She was apprehended
Janki Das and ors. Vs. Putli Kunwar
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-20-1924
Reported in: (1924)ILR46All813
court below were not necessary in order to safeguard the rights of the plaintiffs. Her case, as now put, is that the plaintiffs still have access to the well from, the west and that the roofing over
“The Applicants Are Directed to Put in Appearance Before the Vs. Sta ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-01-2013
stated by counsel for the petitioners that during investigation, the petitioners were found innocent and their names were put in Column No.2 of the final report. However, subsequent thereto, during trial, on moving an application under Section
Acquisition and Have Put in Appearance in Connected Cases No Vs. Sukh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.10950 of 2013 and connected cases [2].acquisition and have put in appearance in connected cases, no separate notice needs to be issued to them in this case. 3].In
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free