Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: protection of women from domestic violence act 2005 Court: mumbai aurangabad Page 3 of about 23 results (0.136 seconds)

Nov 02 2012 (HC)

Pratibha W/O. Bapusaheb Andhare Vs. Bapusaheb S/O. Bhimrao Andhare and ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... 141/2008 filed under section 12 of the domestic violence act, 2005 [hereinafter referred as the "act" for short] is allowed by the sessions court. ..... having regard to the provisions of domestic violence act, 2005? 3. ..... the definition of the term 'aggrieved person' is given in section 2 (a) of the act and it is as under:- "(a) "aggrieved person" means any woman who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the respondent and who alleges to have been subjected to any act of domestic violence by the respondent; " the term 'domestic relationship' is defined in section 2 (f) of the act and it is as under:- "(f) "domestic relationship" means a relationship between two persons who live or have, at any point of time, lived together in a shared household, when they are related by consanguinity ..... all this evidence has created a probability that the respondent married with the petitioner as he was not having issue from the first wife, but the petitioner did not conceive and so the dispute started. ..... she had claimed relief like protection order, allowance for making payment of rent and compensation amount. ..... therefore, women in live-in relationships are also entitled to all the reliefs given in the said act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2016 (HC)

Sanjay Bhaskarrao Kale Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Princ ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submitted that there is a strong nexus amongst the issues like poverty, unemployment, crimerate, domestic violence, human development and alcoholism. ..... it is submitted that the maharashtra water resources regulatory authority [mwrra] act, 2005 requires every person / industry to possess entitlement before using water for any purpose from any source of water in the state of maharashtra, and has laid down guidelines based on which such entitlements may be given. ..... of the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment; (d) that there is equal pay for equal work for both men and women; (e) that the health and strength of workers, men and women, and the tender age of children are not abused and that citizens are not forced by economic necessity to enter avocations unsuited to their age or strength; (f) that children are given ..... ( 1) the state shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice, social, economic and political, shall inform all the institutions of the national life ..... the intervenors, in the meeting with the district collector, aurangabad have shown their willingness to curtail 5% of water supply from 24th april, 2016, further 5% from 8th may, 2016 and then additional 5% from 23rd may, 2016, having total of 15%, keeping in view the acute shortage of water for drinking purpose. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2015 (HC)

Prakash @ Jaywant Vasudeo Wankhede Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... filed by sonali , so also, the proceeding under protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005. ..... of the community can be manifested only at the cost of forfeiting the trust and faith of the community in the system to administer justice in an even handed manner without fear of criticism from the quarters which view white-collar crimes with a permissive eye unmindful of the damage done to the national economy and national interest. 31. ..... of minor victim pw 10 came to be recorded after examining her competency to testify in terms of provisions of section 118 of the indian evidence act by putting her some preliminary questions in order to understand whether she is in a position to give rational answers to those questions because of her ..... shri dhorde, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant/accused, after pointing out the relevant dates coming on record from the evidence of informant pw-7 manoj deore, contended that the minor victim girl was having tons of opportunity to disclose the incident to ..... the code of criminal procedure as such cannot be invoked as a disguise for a retrial in such a case after not availing an opportunity to enter upon defence as seen from the verdict of the hon'ble apex court in the matter of rambhauand another v/s state of maharashtra reported at (2001) 4 scc 759. 20. ..... of sonali manoj deore, she was not in company of the minor victim girl from 3.5.2009 to 22.7.2009 as said minor victim girl was left at the house of sunanda deore paternal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2013 (HC)

Sau. Kalpna W/O Pankaj Rozatkar Vs. Pankaj S/O Supadu Rozatkar

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... it is submitted that, other two proceedings instituted by the applicant, (1) under protection of women from domestic violence act and (2) h.m.p. ..... and therefore, it is inconvenient for the applicant-wife to travel from jalgaon to kalyan to attend the proceedings instituted by the respondent-husband. ..... (2) the concerned court at kalyan to take steps to transfer the said proceedings within one week from receipt of the copy of this order. ..... on the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that, the respondent is working as teacher and therefore, it is difficult for him to travel from kalyan to jalgaon. ..... (3) on transfer of the said proceedings, the civil judge, senior division, jalgaon should make attempt to dispose of the same, as expeditiously as possible, however, within one year from today. ..... apart from what is observed herein above, other three proceedings are pending at jalgaon, out of which, one at the instance of the respondent being special civil suit no. ..... apart from the distance, four years child is with the applicant. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2012 (HC)

Sau. Mangal W/O Ambadas Gaikwad Vs. Ambadas S/O Kachru Gaikwad and Ano ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... the applicant has also filed proceedings under section 12 of the women's domestic violence protection act, 2005 against the respondent-husband and his relatives in the court of the judicial magistrate, first class, beed and same is pending. 4 ..... it is the case of the applicant that, on non fulfillment of the demand of the respondent-husband, the applicant was driven out from matrimonial house and therefore, she went to reside with her parents. ..... is submitted that, at no point of time, the respondent-husband has ill-treated or demanded any amount from the father of the applicant for purchasing flat or furniture. ..... after delivery of a child, the respondent-husband demanded rs.2,00,000/- from father of the applicant and in case, such demand is not fulfilled, the respondent-husband threatened the applicant that, the applicant has to go back to her parent's ..... these are two main grounds, apart from other grounds raised by the applicant, which would tilt the balance of convenience in favour of the applicant. ..... of 2012 to the court of the civil judge, senior division, beed, within one week from receipt of copy of this order. ..... was not driven out from the matrimonial house. ..... application is filed for transfer of the proceedings from ahmednagar to beed. 5. ..... the summons from the court of 5th joint civil judge, senior division, ahmednagar is received by the applicant at ..... 56 of 2012 from the court of 5th joint civil judge, senior division, ahmednagar to the court of the civil judge, senior division, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2012 (HC)

Sau. Mangal W/O Ambadas Gaikwad Vs. Ambadas S/O Kachru Gaikwad and Ano ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... the applicant has also filed proceedings under section 12 of the women's domestic violence protection act, 2005 against the respondent-husband and his relatives in the court of the judicial magistrate, first class, beed and same is pending. 4 ..... it is the case of the applicant that, on non fulfillment of the demand of the respondent-husband, the applicant was driven out from matrimonial house and therefore, she went to reside with her parents. ..... is submitted that, at no point of time, the respondent-husband has ill-treated or demanded any amount from the father of the applicant for purchasing flat or furniture. ..... after delivery of a child, the respondent-husband demanded rs.2,00,000/- from father of the applicant and in case, such demand is not fulfilled, the respondent-husband threatened the applicant that, the applicant has to go back to her parent's ..... these are two main grounds, apart from other grounds raised by the applicant, which would tilt the balance of convenience in favour of the applicant. ..... of 2012 to the court of the civil judge, senior division, beed, within one week from receipt of copy of this order. ..... was not driven out from the matrimonial house. ..... application is filed for transfer of the proceedings from ahmednagar to beed. 5. ..... the summons from the court of 5th joint civil judge, senior division, ahmednagar is received by the applicant at ..... 56 of 2012 from the court of 5th joint civil judge, senior division, ahmednagar to the court of the civil judge, senior division, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //