Proscriptive - Judgment Search Results

Bennett Vs. New Jersey

Court: US Supreme Court

bennett v new jersey 470 u s 632 1985 u s supreme court bennett v new jersey 470 u s...

Shaikh Abdul S/O Maulasaheb Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1986(2)BomCR675

sharad manohar j 1 the question involved in this petition is covered by the judgment of this court reported in...

Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. Sitaram Badrilal

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: [1986]61STC258(Raj); 1985(1)WLN628

s k mal lodha j 1 in pursuance of the order dated 6th september 1976 passed by this court in...

Kanchanbhai Raojibhai AmIn Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [1986]157ITR791(Guj)

b k mehta j 1 the petitioner who was appointed as a valuer under section 4 3 of the estate...

Maniyam Krishnan and anr. Vs. Maniyam Nanukuttan

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1986Ker75

varghese kalliath j 1 this is an appeal by the defendants the first defendant is the father of the 2nd...

Duryodhan Jena Vs. Satyabadi Samal and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1986Ori58

orderd p mohapatra j 1 the defendant 1 in t s no 40 83 filed before the subordinate judge parlakhemundi...

Gowramma Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1985KAR3111

orderdoddakale gowda j 1 rights of grantee not impleaded as party in this writ petition is defeasible subject to fulfilment...

Srish Chandra Choudhury Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court: Guwahati

saikia j 1 the writ petitioner as the general secretary deshi tripura laskart upajati kalyan samity agartala impugns the cabinet...

Pattern Makers Vs. Nlrb

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the house believed that 7 b and 8 c of its bill which included a proscription of internal rules concerning a member s right to resign regulated the member union relationship ..... have lent some support for that assertion in particular the senate rejected the house s proscription on union efforts by intimidating practices to compel or seek to compel any individual to .....

Southern Rate Conf. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 205 440 u s 217 1979 and thus is subject to the sherman act s proscriptions the court did not suggest that because of congressional silence state regulation could not immunize ..... deciding whether congress intended to immunize a federal regulatory program from the sherman act s proscriptions see e g silver v new york stock exchange 373 u s 341 373 u .....