Proscriptive - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: proscriptive Year: 1954 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.006 seconds)Rasiklal Manilal Bhatt and ors. Vs. Savailal Hargovindas Sur
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-20-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Bom285; (1955)57BOMLR239
1 this is an appeal by defendant no 1 and it raises a short question as to the plaintiff s...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPulappatta Kuthiravattath Kottayil Nallappada Nair Vs. Chami Mannadiar ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-13-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Mad177; (1956)IMLJ289
rajamannar c j 1 this second appeal was first heard by krishnaswami nayudu j who considered it necessary that it...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagadindra Nath Chowdhury and anr. Vs. Ulangini Dasi
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-22-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Cal312
p n mookerjee j 1 this appeal raises an important question of hindu law 2 the plaintiff who claims tote...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAccardi Vs. Shaughnessy
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-15-1954
..... it he should receive a new hearing before the board without the burden of previous proscription by the list pp 347 u s 261 268 a as long as the attorney ..... allegation he should receive a new hearing before the board without the burden of previous proscription by the list after the recall or cancellation of the list the board must rule .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarasappa and ors. Vs. Nanjappa and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-29-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Kant62; AIR1955Mys62; (1956)34MLJ164
1 as many as 8 plaintiffs including the present three appellants each of whom owns the several survey numbers referred...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial