Skip to content


Proceed - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: proceed Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 309 results (0.143 seconds)
Jan 22 2003 (HC)

S. Abdullakhan Vs. the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-22-2003

Reported in: (2003)1MLJ597

..... administrative tribunal by that original application the petitioner had challenged the departmental enquiry proceedings initiated against him in the second writ petition also the petitioner seeks ..... india appellant dismissed from service on alleged corruption charges appellant challenged departmental enquiry proceedings initiated against him definition of government servant in rule 2 e is inclusive .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 21 2003 (HC)

Jafer Ahmed Vs. J.N.V. University

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Nov-21-2003

Reported in: RLW2004(1)Raj66; 2004(2)WLC222

result after declaration of result counselling is a part of procedure at the stage of counselling the state govt considered it

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 23 2003 (HC)

C.T.O. Vs. Sadulshahar Krai Vikrai Sahakari Samiti

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Apr-23-2003

Reported in: RLW2003(4)Raj2274; [2004]135STC90(Raj); 2003(3)WLC194

which remains after deducting there from the aggregate amount of proceeds of sale of goods i on which no tax is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 04 2003 (TRI)

Coolade Beverages Ltd., Golden Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-04-2003

Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC190

..... holding company of m s coolade beverages the order dated 17 6 97 dropped the proceedings initiated under show cause notice dated 6 1 1987 is also produced by the appellant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 2003 (TRI)

Ambassador Indl. Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-10-2003

Reported in: (2003)(156)ELT141TriDel

..... evidence about the purchase of the export goods the customs authorities were not justified in proceeding with the case as if it was a case of deliberate misdeclaration of value and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 2003 (TRI)

India Cements Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-10-2003

Reported in: (2003)(155)ELT260TriDel

..... officers have acted on the basis of the legal advice we find no reason to proceed against them further in this matter the misc application therefore stands dismissed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 09 2003 (TRI)

JaIn Raffia Indus. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-09-2003

Reported in: (2003)(161)ELT752TriDel

..... appeal both can be decided simultaneously 2 the facts are not much in dispute the proceedings were initiated against the appellants on the strength of the show cause notice for having .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 06 2003 (TRI)

Kemp and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-06-2003

Reported in: (2004)(175)ELT334Tri(Mum.)bai

..... at and thereafter the matter determined needless to add the original authority will conduct denovo proceedings after granting a opportunity of hearing

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 05 2003 (TRI)

Rasilaben H. Rathod Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-05-2003

Reported in: (2003)(156)ELT675Tri(Mum.)bai

..... under section 124 of the customs act was given inter alia for proposing to initiate proceedings against the appellants and others for violation of section 111 d of the customs act .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 04 2003 (TRI)

Daelim Industrial Co. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-04-2003

Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC140

..... can not be vivisected and part of it subjected to tax the impugned orders have proceeded to do precisely that therefore they are required to be set aside 7 in view .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //