Proceed - Year 1998 - Judgments

Jan 02 1998 (TRI)

D.J. Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-02-1998

Reported in: (1998)(100)ELT177Tri(Mum.)bai

..... that the cost of packing had not been included in the assessable value the appeal proceeded on the footing that corrugated boxes were not durable and therefore notwithstanding the fact that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 17 1998 (TRI)

Commr. of C. Ex. Vs. Venkatachalapathy Industries

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-17-1998

Reported in: (1999)(106)ELT176Tri(Chennai)

..... which would be in the respective headings since 2 a clearly applies therefore we cannot proceed to note 2 b at all and the learned collector appeals reliance on note 2 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 1998 (TRI)

Vakharia Valkal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-21-1998

Reported in: (1999)(105)ELT608Tri(Mum.)bai

..... circumstances in his statement were wrong we are therefore not able to accept that the proceedings were vitiated by not cross examining sh nagoria or that the impugned order suffers from .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 1998 (TRI)

Collector of Customs Vs. Metaltone (Gujarat) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-21-1998

Reported in: (1999)(107)ELT722TriDel

..... with no response as the matter is old and relates to the year 1988 we proceed to deal with the matter on merits after hearing shri r s sangia jdr 4 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 1998 (TRI)

Brytex Auto Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-21-1998

Reported in: (1999)(107)ELT794TriDel

..... e l t j355 in this case the apex court held that the court cannot proceed to make good deficiencies if there maybe any the court must interpret the statute as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 19 1998 (TRI)

Greaves Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-19-1998

Reported in: (1999)(113)ELT270Tri(Mum.)bai

..... acceptable qualitatively are taken for further grinding the forging test pieces are discarded as scrap proceedings were initiated against the appellants by the jurisdictional asstt commissioner on the ground that forging .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 19 1998 (TRI)

Collector of Customs Vs. Hindustan Prakasan Trust

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-19-1998

Reported in: (1999)LC313Tri(Delhi)

..... matter is old in which the goods were imported in the year 1987 we are proceeding to decide the case on merits after hearing shri r s sangia jdr who is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 18 1998 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Brakes India Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-18-1998

Reported in: (1999)(63)ECC127

..... c c e 1996 82 e l t 512 held that the tribunal has to proceed with the decision in atma steels pvt ltd in the light of the decision of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 17 1998 (TRI)

Mukhtar Ahmed Balarangadi Vs. Commissioner of Cus. (P)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-17-1998

Reported in: (1999)(112)ELT842Tri(Mum.)bai

..... this matter was called again at which time the advocate was not present we therefore proceeded to hear the departmental representative at the conclusion of whose address mr kantawala arrived at .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 1998 (TRI)

Cc Vs. Marshal Impex

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-21-1998

Reported in: (1999)(80)LC594Tri(Chennai)

..... of appeal is legally correct even though he did not take part in the adjudication proceedings before the original authority ii whether legally it is correct to hold the supplier of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Proceed - Judgment Search Results