Probative - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: probative Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 124 results (0.021 seconds)Parvatibai W/O Narayan Savara Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-08-2001
Reported in: 2001ALLMR(Cri)1475
dr pratibha upasani j 1 this appeal has been filed by the appellant original accused parvatibai narayan savara being aggrieved...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStandard Metal Corporation Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
Decided on: Sep-14-2001
Reported in: (2002)83ITD500(Jodh.)
1 both the appeals preferred by the assessee against the common order of ld cit a jodhpur dated 15 10...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStandard Metal Corporation Vs. Ito
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
Decided on: Sep-14-2001
Reported in: (2001)73TTJ(Jodh.)842
both these appeals preferred by the assessee against the common order of learned commissioner appeals jodhpur dated 15 10 1993...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCadell Weaving Mills Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-23-2001
Reported in: (2003)78TTJ(Mum.)369
1 this appeal has been posted for hearing before the special bench since while delivering judgment in the case of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindustan Aeronautics Limited Vs. Nashik Workers Union and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-02-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)ALLMR586; 2001(4)BomCR205; (2001)3BOMLR459; [2001(90)FLR624]
f i rebello j 1 apart from the merits of the matter on behalf of the respondents a preliminary objection...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCadell Weaving Mill Co. P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-06-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)ALLMR108; (2001)166CTR(Bom)7; [2001]249ITR265(Bom)
can be imposed on such receipts by inference or by probing into the intention of the legislature vide section 10 13
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. and ors. Vs. Umesh Korga Bhandari and o ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-09-2001
Reported in: [2001(90)FLR713]; (2001)IILLJ157Bom
take place who shall be the appointing authority period of probation seniority promotion etc rule 11 deals with the age of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLatabai Bhagwan Kakade and ors. Vs. Mohammed Ismail Mohd. Saab Bagwan ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-26-2001
Reported in: I(2002)ACC407; II(2002)ACC742; 2002ACJ407
the government will apply itself seriously and urgently to this problem and find a satisfactory method of ameliorating the woes of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMoreshwar Balkrishna Pandare and ors. Vs. Vithal Vyanku Chavan and ors ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-11-2001
Reported in: AIR2001SC2211; 2001(3)ALLMR(SC)499; JT2001(Suppl1)SC49; 2001(4)SCALE181; (2001)5SCC551; [2001]3SCR712
syed shah mohammed quadri j 1 this appeal by special leave is from the judgment and order of the high...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKaushalya Bai and ors. Vs. Ramkishan Kirar and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-16-2001
Reported in: I(2001)ACC742; 2001ACJ1176
arun mishra j 1 claimants have filed the present appeal aggrieved by dismissal of their claim petition which was filed...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial