Pro Forms - Judgment Search Results

Mcgowan (Procurator Fiscal, Edinburgh) (Appellant) Vs. B (Respondent) ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... replied no these questions and replies were noted on a pro forma detention form 8 at 2335 hrs the following statement was read ..... and statement are contained in the acpos solicitor access recording forms sarfs two forms respectively acpos sarf a and b have been devised ..... or sufficient to establish waiver the question is not one of form but rather whether the defendant in fact knowingly and voluntarily .....

Belmont Park Investments Pty Limited (Respondent) Vs. Bny Corporate Tr ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... j rejected the submission he distinguished between an asset in the form of a chose in action representing the quid pro quo for something already done sold or delivered before the onset ..... determining that noteholder priority applied did not deprive lbsf of any previous property in the form of swap counterparty priority the event prevented lbsf from acquiring swap counterparty priority rather than .....

State of T.Nadu and ors. Vs. K Shyam Sunder and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... uniform system of school education in all schools in the state form a common board by integrating the existing four boards and will ..... and for that purpose the court has to look behind the form and appearance thereof to discover the true character and nature ..... the earlier provisions stand obliterated abrogated wiped out wholly i e pro tanto repeal 42 thus undoubtedly submission made by learned senior .....

Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club Pac Vs. Bennett

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a scheme in which one candidate in a race received concrete fundraising advantages in the form of asymmetrical contribution limits just because his opponent had spent a certain amount of ..... that the matching funds provision combats corruption is by eliminating the possibility of any quid pro quo between private interests and publicly funded candidates by eliminating contributions to those candidates .....

Ghulam Abbas and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

..... if on the basis of the material on record the court could form an opinion that the accused might have committed offence it can ..... can neither discuss the probative value of the evidence nor discuss the pros and cons of the prosecution case at this initial stage the ..... the prosecution case therefore the learned trial court cannot go into the pros and cons of the prosecution case it can neither go into .....

Louis Johannes Jacobus Grobbelaar and Others Vs. Shoprite Checkers Lim ...

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

..... from the restraint agreements attachedto the businesses of megasave and sentra forming part of their goodwill these rights included the rights arising ..... had been appointed as commercial manager and a draft acceptance form for taking up shares in the company the last section ..... 1999 exhibit s also contained an income and expense budget a pro forma letter to suppliers which included a statement that mr .....

Commissioner of Customs (imports), Chennai Vs. Ravi Enterprises and Ot ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

yarn so imported at chennai for its intended purpose viz processing of such yarn but diverting the same to the same

Gaurav Midha Vs. Professor Asish Bhattacharya and anr.

Court: Kolkata

the printed instructions of the examination so far as the proviso to point no 5 is concerned it runs as follows petitioner and some other accused persons filled up several application forms wherein some anomalies were detected it is alleged that the

Commissioner Cum Secretary, Department of Power Vs. T.C.Syndicate

Court: Guwahati

appeals under section 96 and order xli of the civil procedure code 1908 read with regulation 48 of the assam frontier these appeals are whether the suits are maintainable in present form and if so whether the plaintiffs in the above mentioned

Ramesh Rout Vs. Rabindra Nath Rout

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2012(1)KLT21(SN); 2012(1)SCC762; 2012(1)SCJ567; AIR2012SCW297; AIR2012SC329

introduced prior thereto there was no such provision it is provided that in respect of each candidate the returning officer should form 2b para 13 e of the 1968 order and forms a and b appended to 1968 order and the guidelines