Pro Forms - Judgment Search Results

Pramod Kumar Pati and anr. Vs. Damodar Sahu and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1953Ori179

..... and was signed by one shamlal in the following form shamlal pro radhakishen sons their lordships held that the use of the word pro indicated that the executant was the proprietor of radhakishen ..... note or accepting a bill of exchange describe themselves as directors or by a similar form of description but do not state on the face of the document that it is .....

Gour Mohan Mullick Vs. Commr. of Agricultural Income-tax, West Bengal

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1954Cal468,[1952]22ITR131(Cal)

..... period sub section 3 of that section pro tides that the appeal shall be in prescribed form and verified in prescribed manner under sub ..... two matters appear to me matters which in themselves do not form the subject matter of any final order they are merely matters ..... contemplates is a disposal or conclusion of the appeal and the forms of orders specified in it are not exhaustive an appellate order .....

Ratilal Panachand Gandhi Vs. State of Bombay

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1953Bom242; (1953)55BOMLR86; ILR1953Bom1187

..... provision which requires accounts to be maintained regularly and in the form prescribed by the charity commissioner interferes with matters of religion ..... religion in articles 25 and 26 is correct then these pro visions cannot be attacked as contravening any fundamental right of ..... doubt that in this case there is definitely a quid pro quo between the public trusts which make the contributions and .....

Bishnupada Mondal and anr. Vs. Dwijabar Mondal and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1953Cal241

..... of this case that the kobala ex 1 and the kabuliyat ex 2 formed parts of one transaction it is important to note in this connection ..... on 4 9 1943 it was apparently sold by the plaintiffs to pro forma defendant no 2 along with some other lands admittedly patit the ..... which had already been sold to and purchased by the lessor the pro forma defendant no 2 there remains little scope for thinking in the .....

Dr. K.C. Nambiar Vs. State of Madras by Its Chief Secretary and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1953Mad351; (1953)IMLJ49

suits does not bar government from granting exemption nothing to prove exemption granted to circumvent prior order held exemption granted on a judicial approach the decision will be quasi judicial prescribed forms of procedure are not necessary to make an inquiry judicial

The State Vs. Biswanath Naik

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1952Ori220

would suffice the provisions of limitation embodied in the substantive provision of the sub section 1 of section 173 of the not good law it is well settled that where certain forms and formalities are prescribed as a condition precedent for jurisdiction

Md. Lutfulla Saheb Vs. Gauhati Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court: Guwahati

these circumstances justification for the presumption that if defendants had produced the accounts they would not have supported their contention so sada singh had authorityto borrow money from the plaintiff bank formessrs v allies and company and whetherthe plaintiff bank acted on

Sithoolal Chhoteylal Vs. Commr. of Income Tax/Excess Profits Tax, U.P. ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1953All437; [1953]23ITR10(All)

be taken out of the business leaving only the normal profit which was known as the standard profit it was for incurred either in the same transaction or in similar transactions forming part of the same scheme in the case before us

Edward Ezra and ors. Vs. the State

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1953Cal263,56CWN875

who obtained the orders 7 the next part of the prosecution case relates to the role played by a group of had originally been constituted and that section in its unamended form was in force on 16 12 1949 when mr basu

Naubat Rai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1953P& H137

or reduced if all or any of the charges are proved dismissal or reduction in rank will follow this may indeed government board v arlidge 1915 a c 120 in the former case all that was held was that as the board