Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: prince of wales Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 24,987 results (0.048 seconds)

Trustees of Dartmouth Coll. Vs. Woodward

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 529 protestants, and for the extinguishing the hopes of the pretended prince of wales, and his open and secret abettors;" that is to say, the president, before the governor of our said province for the time being, or by one by him empowered to that service, or by the president of our said council, ..... wales v. .....

Baban Mayacha and ors. Vs. Nagu Shravucha and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1877)ILR2Bom19

..... 109, passed in 1858 and founded upon an award of sir john patteson upon questions between the crown and the prince of wales as to the right to mines and minerals 'between high and low-watermarks within the county of cornwall, and under the estuaries and tidal rivers within the same county, and under the open sea ..... albert edward, prince of wales and duke of cornwall, in right of his duchy of cornwall on the other hand, vested in her majesty the queen in right of her crown as part of the soil and territorial possessions of the crown.'30. .....

The Empress Vs. Keshub Mohajan and ors. and

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1882)ILR8Cal985

..... 106 (an act for the better government of india), other than the settlement of prince of wales' island, singapore and malacca. .....

Triccam Panachand Vs. the Bombay and Central India Railway Company and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1885)ILR9Bom244

..... , chapter 106 other than the settlement of prince of 'wales' island, singapore and malacca, and the first section of the statute there referred to, which was passed in 1858, vests in her majesty all territories then in the possession or under the government of the east india ' ..... the maharaja sindia, and is surrounded by territories belonging to that prince, was by treaty dated the 2nd december 1871, between the british government and the maharaja sindia (aitchison's treaties, vol. .....

Louisville, N.A. and C. Ry. Co. Vs. Louisville Trust Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... ) 725, 753-755; prince of wales assurance society v. .....

Akshot Kumar Ghose Vs. Commissioners of the Poet of Calcutta

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1906)ILR33Cal1243

..... the road was completed early in 1875 and the evidence establishes that on the 25th december of that year his majesty the king-emperor, then prince of wales, drove through this street on his way to chitpore road. .....

Chapsey Cooverji Vs. Jethabhai Nursey and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1907)9BOMLR514

..... the prince of wales on his arrival at bombay. ..... he cannot suggest that the notice mentioned any business other than that connected with the visit of the prince of wales.10. .....

Shripad Vishnu Pandit Vs. the Secretary of State for India

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1926)28BOMLR1175

..... village of ruighar taluka javali, has taken an active part in the non-co-operation movement by presiding over a meeting hold on november 16, 1921, at wai for boycotting the visit to india of his royal highness the prince of wales and speaking in favour of it and thus failed to observe the conditions of faithfulneas and loyalty be government laid down in the original sunad of the inam village, government have ordered that his 5/36th share in the ..... a memo, to the plaintiff, dated november 21, 1921 :-it is reported to me that you presided at a meeting held at wai on the 16th instant to recommend that the visit of his royal highness the prince of wales to india should be boycotted and that you spoke in favour of the motion. ..... . the prince of wales, who was visiting india as an official guest, it is impossible to say that such conduct on the part of the plaintiff was in any way consistent with his duties by which he was bound under ..... 26, 1921:-it is a fact that i presided at the meeting convened to express the feeling of the public of wai towards the then proposed visit of his royal highness the prince of wales. ..... a report, dated november 17, 1921, to the collector in which he said:the local branch of the congress committee convened a meeting last evening for boycotting the visit to india of his royal highness the prince of wales. mr. ..... opening speech dwelt, upon the necessity of the proposed boycott since the prince was not called to india by indians but by the white government servants .....

Sripad Vishnu Pandit Vs. Secretary of State for India

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1926Bom581

..... of ruighar, taluka javali, has taken an active part in the non-co-operation movement by presiding over a meeting held on november 16, 1921, at wai for boycotting the visit to india of his royal highness the prince of wales and thus failed to observe the conditions of faithfulness and loyalty to government laid down in the original sanad of the inam village, government have ordered that his 5/36th share in the aforesaid village shall be forfeited.2. ..... a memo, to the plaintiff, dated november, 21, 1921.it is reported to me that you presided at a meeting held at wai on the 16th instant to recommend that the visit of his royal highness the prince of wales to india should he boycotteed and that you spoke in favour of the motion. ..... . the prince of wales, who was visiting india as an official guest, it is impossible to say that such conduct on the part of the plaintiff was in any way consistent with his duties by which he was bound under ..... november 26, 1921:it is a fact that i presided at the meeting convened to express the feeling of the public of wai towards the then proposed visit of his royal highness the prince of wales. ..... a report, dated november 17, 1921, to the collector in which he said:the local branch of the congress committee convened a meeting last evening for boycotting the visit to india of his royal highness the prince of wales. mr. ..... opening speech dwelt upon the necessity of the proposed boycott since the prince was not called to india by indians but by the white government .....

Secretary of State and ors. Vs. Rishi Ram Jagdish Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1928All145; 108Ind.Cas.457

..... we delivered the goods to the prince of wales flour mills, who was appointed sub-agent of the plaintiff's agent by endorsement of shiv ram narain to the prince of wales flour mills on the receipt.4. ..... shiv ram narain endorsed to the prince of wales flour mills which firm took delivery. ..... the sole question, with which we are concerned in this appeal, is whether the railway company acted illegally in making the goods over to the prince of wales flour mills.3. ..... they were unloaded on the 30th may 1921, and delivered on the 31st may, 1921 to the prince of wales flour mills. .....