Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: prince of wales Page 1 of about 24,995 results (0.024 seconds)

Apr 09 1926 (PC)

Shripad Vishnu Pandit Vs. the Secretary of State for India

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1926)28BOMLR1175

..... village of ruighar taluka javali, has taken an active part in the non-co-operation movement by presiding over a meeting hold on november 16, 1921, at wai for boycotting the visit to india of his royal highness the prince of wales and speaking in favour of it and thus failed to observe the conditions of faithfulneas and loyalty be government laid down in the original sunad of the inam village, government have ordered that his 5/36th share in the ..... a memo, to the plaintiff, dated november 21, 1921 :-it is reported to me that you presided at a meeting held at wai on the 16th instant to recommend that the visit of his royal highness the prince of wales to india should be boycotted and that you spoke in favour of the motion. ..... . the prince of wales, who was visiting india as an official guest, it is impossible to say that such conduct on the part of the plaintiff was in any way consistent with his duties by which he was bound under ..... 26, 1921:-it is a fact that i presided at the meeting convened to express the feeling of the public of wai towards the then proposed visit of his royal highness the prince of wales. ..... a report, dated november 17, 1921, to the collector in which he said:the local branch of the congress committee convened a meeting last evening for boycotting the visit to india of his royal highness the prince of wales. mr. ..... opening speech dwelt, upon the necessity of the proposed boycott since the prince was not called to india by indians but by the white government servants .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 1926 (PC)

Sripad Vishnu Pandit Vs. Secretary of State for India

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1926Bom581

..... of ruighar, taluka javali, has taken an active part in the non-co-operation movement by presiding over a meeting held on november 16, 1921, at wai for boycotting the visit to india of his royal highness the prince of wales and thus failed to observe the conditions of faithfulness and loyalty to government laid down in the original sanad of the inam village, government have ordered that his 5/36th share in the aforesaid village shall be forfeited.2. ..... a memo, to the plaintiff, dated november, 21, 1921.it is reported to me that you presided at a meeting held at wai on the 16th instant to recommend that the visit of his royal highness the prince of wales to india should he boycotteed and that you spoke in favour of the motion. ..... . the prince of wales, who was visiting india as an official guest, it is impossible to say that such conduct on the part of the plaintiff was in any way consistent with his duties by which he was bound under ..... november 26, 1921:it is a fact that i presided at the meeting convened to express the feeling of the public of wai towards the then proposed visit of his royal highness the prince of wales. ..... a report, dated november 17, 1921, to the collector in which he said:the local branch of the congress committee convened a meeting last evening for boycotting the visit to india of his royal highness the prince of wales. mr. ..... opening speech dwelt upon the necessity of the proposed boycott since the prince was not called to india by indians but by the white government .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 08 1927 (PC)

Secretary of State and ors. Vs. Rishi Ram Jagdish Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1928All145; 108Ind.Cas.457

..... we delivered the goods to the prince of wales flour mills, who was appointed sub-agent of the plaintiff's agent by endorsement of shiv ram narain to the prince of wales flour mills on the receipt.4. ..... shiv ram narain endorsed to the prince of wales flour mills which firm took delivery. ..... the sole question, with which we are concerned in this appeal, is whether the railway company acted illegally in making the goods over to the prince of wales flour mills.3. ..... they were unloaded on the 30th may 1921, and delivered on the 31st may, 1921 to the prince of wales flour mills. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 1928 (PC)

The Gujerat Ginning and Manufacturing Company Limited Vs. the Motilal ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1929)31BOMLR1310

..... then in attorney-general to the prince of wales v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 1964 (HC)

Nowranglal Agarwala Vs. State of Orissa, Represented by the Commission ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1965Ori44; [1965]16STC271(Orissa)

..... 'doubtless as regards proprietary interest, there may be estoppel by conduct known as estoppel by pais, see attorney-general and the prince of wales v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1963 (SC)

Mirza Raja Shri Pushavathi Viziaram Gajapathi Raj Manne Sultan Bahadur ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1964]2SCR403

..... sathianathan in his report also took the view that the property belonged to the samsthanam, that the occasion for the building was to commemorate the visit of the prince of wales to india in 1875, that the object of the building was to provide a public amenity along with others for the town of vizianagram, the headquarters of the estate; that during the time that the court of ..... as to the plaintiff's claim that subsequently acquired properties had been incorporated in the estate, the learned judge upheld his claim in respect of the prince of wales market at vizianagram, permanent lease-hold rights in respect of nine villages, and the admirality house at madras, waltair house and elk house at ooty ..... the high court has held that the trial court was right in coming to the conclusion that the prince of wales market and the permanent leasehold rights in respect of nine villages had been incorporated in the impartible estate ..... in their appeals, defendants 1 and 2 challenged the correctness of the decision of the courts below that the prince of wales market was impartible and that the permanent lease-hold rights in respect of nine villages were also not partible ..... contends that the courts below were in error in holding that the prince of wales market built at vizianagram forms part of the impartible estate. ..... has no doubt quarrelled with some of the reasons given by the appellate court in support of its conclusion that the prince of wales market had been incorporated in the impartible estate. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 2010 (SC)

The Secretary and Curator, Victoria Memorial Hall Vs. Howrah Ganatantr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2010(2)SCALE739

..... similar is the position with the indian museum at kolkata, national museum, national gallery of modern art at new delhi, chhatrapati shivaji maharaj vastu sangrahalaya museum (formerly the prince of wales museum) at mumbai, nehru memorial museum & library and national museum in new delhi. ..... it was inaugurated by the edward, the viiith (the then prince of wales) and was opened for public viewing. ..... it possesses the third largest painting in the world-vassili verestchagin's 'the state procession of the prince of wales into jaipur in 1876'. ..... the facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are as under:a foundation stone of victoria memorial hall (hereinafter called 'vmh') was laid by the king george the vth (the then prince of wales) on january 4, 1906. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 1969 (HC)

P.V.G. Raju Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1970]78ITR601(AP)

..... since the question referred to us is couched in wide language and is broad enough to include consideration of the question now raised before us, we propose to keep in view the two admitted items of impartible property, that is to say, the prince of wales market and the 38 items of jewellery, regalia, and consider the main question relating to these two items. ..... the contention of the assessee is that except two items which comprise of (1) prince of wales market, and (2) 38 items of jewellery which by custom are considered as regalia, alone are impartible properties, the-other items of properties shown by the assessee are partible. ..... is in the affirmative partly, that is to say, we hold that the department is correct in law in determining the status of the assessee as an individual and not as joint family in regard to the two items of the impartible properties, that is to say, (1) prince of wales market and (2) 38 items of jewellery called regalia. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 14 1966 (HC)

P. Vs. G. Raju, Rajah of Vizianagaram V. Commissioner of Income-tax, A ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1967]66ITR122(AP)

..... the market known as the prince of wales market owned by the assessee was constructed as far back as in 1876 to common rate the visit of the then prince of wales to india. ..... indisputably the assessee is the owner of the various buildings, godowns, shops and the open space in the area known as the prince of wales market area. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 1978 (HC)

Additional Commissioner of Income-tax and anr. Vs. Victoria Technical ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1979]120ITR358(Mad)

..... . madhava rao's scholarship fund and prince of wales scholarship fund from which scholarships are granted, and the money given by the government of madras in 1903 for making tours to centres of arts and crafts for the purpose mentioned above ..... madhava rao's scholarship fund and the prince of wales scholarship fund. ..... madhava raoscholarship fund|||these funds are utilised for the grant ofscholarship to deserving students nominated by the principal, school of artsand crafts, madras.5.prince of wales scholarship fund 6. c.w.e. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //