Preventable - Judgment Search Results

Dilip Kumar Pyne Vs. S.N. Das Gupta, Assistant Collector of Customs fo ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1989(24)LC95(Calcutta),1988(33)ELT264(Cal)

..... 2 on 3 10 1972 the complainant opposite party no 1 assistant collector of customs preventive filed a petition of complaint against the petitioner before the learned magistrate on the allegation ..... high court in the case of chander bhan v the state reported in all india prevention of food adulteration journal 1978 at p 141 the aforesaid decisions support the view that .....

Nemichand Bhansali Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise (Preventive) R ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1981MP253; 1981(8)ELT938(MP); 1981MPLJ699

..... and h to m of sub section 2 for pun poses of declaration then nothing prevented it to add and the similar words in any capacity or in all capacities at .....

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

..... de droit objectif or is it mainly directed towards the protection of private individuals by preventing illegal encroachments on their individual rights jurisdiction de droit subjectif the first contention rests ..... of the public service seem curiously inappropriate when to uphold the claim is to prevent successful prosecution of the charges inappropriate because what is charged is itself the grossly .....

Mian Bashir Ahmad and Etc. Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

..... a member after his election as a member in essence therefore this provision aims at preventing defections simpliciter though the restrictions are by virtue of the explanation to the section limited ..... shape that apart jurists and law teachers have expressed reasonable doubts about the constitutionality or preventing defections by law prof paras diwan in his book does our constitution need a second .....

Michael M. Vs. Superior Ct.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of teenage childbearing the court concluded that the state has a compelling interest in preventing such pregnancies because males alone can physiologically cause the result which the law properly ..... physical injury from sexual intercourse they further held contrary to our decision that pregnancy prevention was not a plausible purpose of the legislation thus neither court reached the issue .....

Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. Vs. Hall

Court: US Supreme Court

..... below applicable commission rate ceilings merely because arkla s own breach of contract prevented respondents from filing that rate with the commission footnote 2 31 the commission stated finally ..... it surely exalts procedure over substance to deny respondents relief because they were wrongfully prevented from following the normal statutory procedures under the normal procedures no change in rates .....

Nlrb Vs. Amax Coal Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to contribute to a multiemployer trust fund does not pose the danger congress sought to prevent congress treated the issues of multiemployer bargaining units and multiemployer trust funds quite distinctly it ..... follows i shall now deal briefly with strikes invading the prerogatives of management the bill prevents a union from dictating to an employer on the question of bargaining with union .....

Sardar Ali. Vs. State and anr.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 1982CriLJ644

..... magistrate jammu the charges under section 7 16 of the prevention of food adulteration act have been framed against the petitioner ..... law all rules regulations and bye laws relating to the prevention of adulteration of food made under such corresponding law in ..... act 6 thus rules regulations bye laws relating to the prevention of adulteration of food made under such corresponding law and .....

Manohar P. Kharkhar and Another Vs. Raghuraj and Another

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1981)IILLJ459Bom

..... among all operational levels is of paramount importance to achieve and maintain an effective prevention programme to minimise the possibilities of aerial piracy sabotage bomb threat etc part ii ..... according to mr setalvad to colourable exercise of power 48 now regulation 44 merely prevents the corporation from imposing any punishment contemplated under regulation 43 without following the procedure .....

City of Memphis Vs. Greene

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the barrier across west drive by deeding public property to private landowners nothing will prevent the residents of hein park from excluding undesirable pedestrian as well as vehicular traffic ..... sustain against thirteenth amendment challenge conduct as egregious as erection of a barrier to prevent predominantly negro traffic from entering a historically all white neighborhood for reasons that i .....