Skip to content


Pressure - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: pressure Page 1 of about 329 results (0.107 seconds)
Jan 10 1979 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-ii Vs. Pressure Pilling Co. (I ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1980]126ITR333(Bom); [1979]1TAXMAN406(Bom)

..... and concrete is then introduced into the holes under applied air pressure this when set forms a termination pile giving a very ..... introduced to the casings and compressed air is admitted the air pressure forces the concrete down the casing and presses it into ..... or by mechanical means 6 thus according to the judicial member pressure pilling was only a construction work undertaken by the assessee company .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 1995 (TRI)

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Pressure Cookers and Appliances

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1995)LC330Tri(Delhi)

..... the respondent s name these separators are supplied to the respondent for use in the pressure cookers manufactured by it the assistant collector central excise held that the respondent was the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 09 1995 (HC)

Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, Bombay Vs. Pressure Pack ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1995(2)MhLj357

dr b p saraf j 1 by this reference under section 61 1 of the bombay sales tax act 1959...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2001 (HC)

Pressure Sensitive System (India) Ltd. Vs. Aristocraft International P ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2001MP135; 2001(5)MPHT130; 2001(3)MPLJ520

..... tender evaluation committee hereinafter called as stec constituted by government of india and m s pressure sensitive systems india ltd was found eligible 5 against the global tender floated following five ..... 99 another representation was submitted on 6 9 99 the tender submitted by m s pressure sensitive systems was based on business rivalry by incorporating the amendment the petitioner submits that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 30 1995 (TRI)

Pressure Cookers and Appliances Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)(81)ELT124TriDel

..... as 1st 2nd and 3rd appeal 2 assessee is a manufacturer of pressure cookers they are packed in card board cartons in some cases ..... the collector appeals was not prepared to go by the number of pressure cookers sold he took the view that these figures are deceptive ..... so what is relevant is to consider the number of units of pressure cookers sold with and without primary packing going by these statistics .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 19 2001 (TRI)

Pressure Pack P. Ltd. and Shivnath Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... 00 the deputy commissioner had passed a common order demanding duty on pressure pack p ltd and imposing a penalty on shivnath kanoria the ..... which is appealed before us purports to dispose of the appeal by pressure pack p ltd it is entirely silent about any appeal having been ..... shivnath kanoria the order in short disposes only of the appeal of pressure pack p ltd we are therefore not able to find an .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 1987 (TRI)

Pressure Cookers and Appliances Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(11)ECC233

1 m s pressure cookers and appliances limited of nangal shama pca buy goods which they call basic grill .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 26 2004 (TRI)

Pressure Sensitive Systems (i) Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT445Tri(Mum.)bai

1 the miscellaneous application is for rectification of order no c ii 185 86 wzb 2003 dated 23 1 2003...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 19 1986 (HC)

Pressure Cookers and Appliances Ltd. Vs. P.A. Geetha

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1987(1)BomCR399

s c pratap j 1 this is defendants revision application challenging concurrent orders of the two courts below setting aside...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 23 2003 (TRI)

Pressure Sensitive Systems Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT404Tri(Mum.)bai

1 appeal taken up for disposal with the consent of both sides after waiving deposit 2 the appeal is against...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //