Pressure - Judgment Search Results

Pressure Sensitive System (India) Ltd. Vs. Aristocraft International P ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2001MP135; 2001(5)MPHT130; 2001(3)MPLJ520

Appeals - L.P.A. No. 118/2000, L.P.A. No. 124/2000 and L.P.A. No. 127/2000 have been respectively preferred by M/s. Pressure Sensitive System (India) Limited, Union of India and M/s. Aristrocraft International Private Limited, aggrieved by the order passed

Pressure Cookers and Appliances Ltd. Vs. P.A. Geetha

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1987(1)BomCR399

Matched in: Parties Pressure Cookers and Appliances Ltd. Vs. P.A. Geetha

Pressure Sensitive Systems India Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Matched in: Parties Pressure Sensitive Systems India Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Pressure Sensitive Systems Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT404Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Parties Pressure Sensitive Systems Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Pressure Sensitive Systems (i) Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT445Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Parties Pressure Sensitive Systems (i) Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Southern Pressure Castings Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2005)(102)ECC566

Matched in: Parties Southern Pressure Castings Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Pressure Cookers and Appliances Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)(81)ELT124TriDel

by the Department. They will be referred as 1st, 2nd and 3rd appeal.2. Assessee is a manufacturer of pressure cookers. They are packed in card board cartons. In some cases, and according to assessee in case of

Pressure Pack P. Ltd. and Shivnath Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

is unnecessary and is accordingly dismissed.3. Shivnath Kanoria in appeal E/3575/00 stated to be the managing director of Pressure Pack P. Ltd. whose appeal is numbered E/3574/00.The Deputy Commissioner had passed a common order demanding duty on

Pressure Cookers and Appliances Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(11)ECC233

1. M/s. Pressure Cookers and Appliances Limited of Nangal Shama (PCA) buy goods which they call basic grill mechanism or griller

Hawkins Cookers Limited Vs. Khaitan Pressure Cooker Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

No.448 of 1990 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Hawkins Cookers Limited Vs. Khaitan Pressure Cooker Pvt. Ltd. For the Plaintiff : Mr. Ranjan Bachawat, Sr. Advocate Mr. Debnath Ghosh, Advocate Mr. Prabhakar