Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: preservation of trees act 1976 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Page 4 of about 886 results (0.354 seconds)

Hiralal Patni Vs. Loonkaram Sethiya and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1962SC21; [1962]1SCR868

..... or custody of the property; ................................................................ (d) confer upon the receiver all such powers, as to bringing and defending suits and for the realization, management, protection, preservation and improvement of the property, the collection of the rents and profits thereof,........ (2) nothing in this rule shall authorize the court to remove from the possession ..... by the receiver, it is usually the case that such decree supersedes the functions of the receiver, since there is then nothing further for him to act upon, although it would seem to be still necessary that a formal application be made for his discharge. but when the court by its decree does ..... jeopardized by any action of the defendants.' 8. then the high court pointed out that the collector had the power under s. 3 of the industrial disputes act to make arrangements for the running of the mills. finally the high court observed : 'it may be necessary from time to time to give directions to .....

Smt. Ujjam Bai Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1963]1SCR778; [1963]Supp2SCR778

..... entrusted the duty of enforcing them to the supreme court, the highest judicial authority in the country. this court has no more important function than to preserve the inviolable fundamental rights of the people; for, the fathers of the constitution, in their fullest confidence, have entrusted them to the care of this court ..... administrative tribunals in exercise of the powers conferred on them under the act, this court may in its discretion ordinarily accept the findings and dispose of the application on the basis of those findings. 203. the following of this procedure preserves the jurisdiction of this court as envisaged by the constitution and safeguards ..... the guaranteed rights of the citizens of this country without at the same time affecting the smooth working of the administrative tribunals created under the act. if the other view is accepted, this .....

Mcgowan Vs. Maryland

Court : US Supreme Court

..... margin. [ footnote 2/39 ] thus, the english experience demonstrates the intimate relationship between civil sunday regulation and the interest of a state in preserving to its people a recurrent time of mental and physical recuperation from the strains and pressures of their ordinary labors. it demonstrates also, of course, ..... indisputably works of the english establishment. their prefatory language spoke their religious inspiration, [ footnote 2/17 ] exceptions made from time to time were expressly limited to preserve inviolable the hours of the divine service, [ footnote 2/18 ] and in their administration page 366 u. s. 474 a spirit of inquisitorial piety was ..... pressures of the industrial revolution, agitation began for new page 366 u. s. 478 legislative action to preserve the traditional english sunday. [ footnote 2/28 ] at the turn of the century, the factory and workshop act, 1901, prohibited the sunday employment of women and children in industrial establishments. [ footnote 2/29 ] .....

Communist Party Vs. Sacb

Court : US Supreme Court

..... raising them here. naacp v. alabama, supra; bates v. little rock, supra. but the rights of its members, as potentially affected by the act to receive and use passports, seek and hold certain employment, be naturalized and preserve their citizenship once naturalized, are not of this category. we limit our consideration to the constitutionality of 7 as applied in this proceeding. v ..... institutions, even from the gravest external dangers. but where the problems of accommodating the exigencies of self-preservation and the values of liberty are as complex and intricate as they are in the situation described in the findings of 2 of the subversive activities control act -- when existing government is menaced by a worldwide integrated movement which employs every combination of possible .....

Scales Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the membership clause. but it was assumed by many of.the proponents of the 1950 act, perhaps illogically and under a misapprehension as to the law, that the amendment should be defeated to preserve the integrity of the 1950 act and the smith act. certainly it was considered by no one that the membership clause had been repealed, or ..... move against those who take up arms against it. of course, the constituted authority has the right of self-preservation. but we deal in this prosecution of scales only with the legality of ideas and beliefs, not with overt acts. the court speaks of the prevention of "dangerous behavior" by punishing those "who work to bring about ..... its application to communists barred by 4(f) of the 1950 act. [ footnote 8 ] november 18, 1951, to november 18, 1954 .....

Joseph Kuruvilla Vellukunnel Vs. the Reserve Bank of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1962SC1371; [1962]32CompCas514(SC); [1962]Supp3SCR632

..... , if the interests of the depositors are to be safeguarded. to achieve solidarity in banking operations and also to preserve the rights of the depositors while a bank continues and more so when it cannot, the banking companies act was the logical, and indeed, the only answers. 25. we have seen that the reserve bank was already ..... . the palai bank chose to do neither and 'the reserve bank far from having acted without material or in a hasty and ill-considered manner, had, doubtless alive to grave responsibility placed upon it to preserve the banking structure of the country, acted with a degree of care and circumspection which has drawn to it adverse criticism from ..... those who do not share its responsibility. faced with the run it would have failed in its duty by the depositors had it not acted as it did.' 68. the .....

Bhau Ram Vs. B. Baijnath Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1962SC1476; [1962]Supp3SCR724

..... of vicinage also imposes a restriction which is reasonable.40. one of the advantages of the law of pre-emption based on vicinage earlier noticed is the preservation of the privacy of homes. in regard to this, it was said that purdah system has disappeared and therefore there is no need to protect it. ..... state the central provinces-special legislation had to be undertaken for checking the evil of fragmentation by enacting a measure like the central provinces consolidation of the holdings act (act viii, 1928) no such necessity has so far been felt in berar presumably because of the operation of the law of pre-emption.' 62. this ..... of ascertainment; that the choice of measures is for the legislature, that the legislatures are presumed to have investigated the subject and to have acted with reason, that an act of the legislature should be sustained unless it violates constitutional limitations beyond reasonable question'. the last punjab case therefore does not add any further reason .....

Baker Vs. Carr

Court : US Supreme Court

..... constitutions which demanded or allowed apportionment of both houses on the basis of population, [ footnote 4/84 ] unqualifiedly or with only qualifications respecting the preservation of local boundaries. [ footnote 4/85 ] three page 369 u. s. 312 more apportioned on what was essentially a population base, but ..... 4/48 ] by redistribution. [ footnote 4/49 ] in 1944, redistribution was put on a periodic footing by the house of commons (redistribution of seats) act of that year, [ footnote 4/50 ] which committed a continuing primary responsibility for reapportioning the commons to administrative agencies (boundary commissions for england, scotland, wales ..... and, indeed, based upon no lawfully pertinent factor whatever." [ footnote 14 ] the appellants claim that no general assembly constituted according to the 1901 act will submit reapportionment proposals either to the people or to a constitutional convention. there is no provision for popular initiative in tennessee. amendments proposed in the .....

United States Vs. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank

Court : US Supreme Court

..... further concentration would be legally privileges. on the contrary, if concentration is already great, the importance of preventing even slight increases in concentration and so preserving the possibility of eventual deconcentration is correspondingly great. comment, note 39 supra, at 1644. [ footnote 43 ] the fact that some of the ..... u. s. 380 deliberate policy judgment that "it is impossible to subject bank mergers to the simple rule of section 7 of the clayton act. under that act, a merger would be barred if it might tend substantially to lessen competition, regardless of the effects on the public interest." 105 cong.rec ..... (emphasis added.) clearly the understanding of congress was that a consolidation of two corporations was an acquisition of assets. [ footnote 2/37 ] nor did congress act inadvertently or without purpose in limiting the asset acquisition provision to corporations subject to the jurisdiction of the federal trade commission, thereby excluding bank mergers. the reports, .....

S. Pratap Singh Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1964SC72; (1966)ILLJ458SC; [1964]4SCR733

..... the appellant to opt for retirement could not be said to be a right which comes within r. 1.6 of the 1959 rules as rule 1.6 preserves such rights to which the government servant be entitled by or under any law or by the terms of his agreement. it contemplates such rights which the law ..... assertions of fact which could be helpful to the court in determining whether those facts would have constituted good reasons for the chief minister's displeasure and for his acting malafide in getting the various orders issued by the governor. it was really for the appellant, in the first instance, to make definite allegations in his petition. ..... (punishment and appeal) rules, 1952, hereinafter called the punishment and appeal rules, this rule reads : '(1) without prejudice to the provisions of the public servants (inquiries) act, 1850, no order of dismissal, removal or reduction, shall be passed against a person to whom these rules are applicable, unless he has been given a reasonable opportunity of .....