Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: preservation of trees act 1976 chapter 1 preliminary Page 1 of about 5,345 results (0.237 seconds)

Mar 24 2008 (HC)

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

..... burning of lime or charcoal etc. when such regulation or prohibition appears necessary for any forest not belonging to government, for the purpose of conservation of trees and forests, preservation and improvement of soil, improvement of grazing, maintenance of a water supply in springs, rivers and tanks, maintenance, increase and distribution of the supply ..... the intent and object in enacting them. the reason for the state government not being able to pursue the measures for preserving and protecting the forest wealth is obvious.the 1927 act did not provide for any acquisition and vesting. the power in that behalf was lacking as is apparent from the reading ..... , cannot now treat these lands as private forest is the submission.147. we see no force in this submission either. the private forest (acquisition) act is an act specifically dealing with the private forest, their acquisition and vesting in the state government so also the consequences flowing therefrom. further, it covers this specific .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 1974 (HC)

Prithi Vs. State Etc.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1974RLR479

..... be apparently superior to it. the promulgation of the rule of law is to be maintained, by doing justice. these judicial concepts are the basis of the preservation of suo motu juriadiction in various remedial provisions like section 439 of the code where remedies are provided allowing a wide discretion to the court to exercise reviewary, ..... sub-divisional magisrate empowered by the state government in that behalf may call for and examine the record of any proceedings before any inferior criminal court and then act in accordance with the rest of the provision. on examining any record under section 435 of the code, the sessions judge or the district magistrate may ..... the period permitted by law and since no certified copy of any order had been filed within the period prescribed by article 131 of the limitation act, 1963, hereafter called 'the act' the petition apart from being barred by limitation suffers from the infirmity that there is no competent petition before the court. reliance in this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2000 (HC)

Baljit Kaur Vohra and ors. Vs. Dr. Vikramjit Singh Vohra and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [2003]115CompCas194(P& H); (2000)126PLR683; [2004]50SCL693(Punj& Har)

..... [2000] 1 all instant judgments 541.14. conscious of the above reasoning, however, keeping in view the legal scenario emerging from the amended provisions of the companies act, their implication in law and effects on the prescribed procedure, we would consider it appropriate to emphasise the need for amending the existing relevant high court rules and ..... court in accordance with law. aggrieved by the judgment of the bench, ms. baljit kaur and others have preferred an appeal under section 10f of the companies act. in the above circumstances, the registry of this court has listed the appeal for preliminary hearing before the division bench.4. thus, the pertinent question that falls ..... and relevant statutory provisions would be necessary. dr. v. j. s. bora and others had filed a petition under sections 397, 398, 399 of the companies act, 1956, before the company law board, new delhi, praying that there was mismanagement exercised by ms. baljit kaur bora and others in relation to the affairs of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2012 (HC)

M/S. Gita Cotton Trading Company, Chilakaluripet Vs. the Chief Control ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... . he took into account, the proceedings, dated 02.07.1990 issued by the 1st respondent. revision filed by the petitioner under section 56(1) of the indian stamp act, 1899, before the 1st respondent, was rejected through order, dated 26.07.2006. hence, this writ petition. the petitioner submits that there is absolutely no justification for the ..... possession of property from a lessee. a preliminary decree is to be passed and it is followed by final decree. chapter iv of the transfer of property act, 1882 (for short the act) confers rights and places obligations on the mortgagors, on the one hand, and mortgagees, on the other hand, which are typical and germatone to such ..... underlying the transaction, namely use of the property belonging to the lessor by the lessee, on payment of rent and for a stipulated term. chapter v of the act enlists the rights, which a lessor has against the lessee and vice-versa. termination of lease, on the one hand, and foreclosure/redemption of mortgage, on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 26 1979 (SC)

Raj Kapoor and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC258; 1980CriLJ202; (1980)1SCC43; [1980]1SCR1081

..... 397 overlaps. the opening words of section 482 contradict this contention because nothing in the code, not even section 397 can affect the amplitude of the inherent power preserved in so many terms by the language of section 482. even so, a general principle pervades this branch of law when a specific provision is made; easy ..... has for similar purpose, found. may be, even a rebuttable presumption arises in favour of the statutory certificate but could be negatived by positive evidence. an act of recognition of moral worthiness by a statutory agency is not opinion evidence but an instance or transaction where the fact in issue has been asserted, recognised or ..... sanitizing and even tabooing films so that noxious obscenity may not be foul and erotic aroma make mass appeal15. i am satisfied that the film censor board, acting under section 5a, is specially entrusted to screen off the silver screen pictures which offensively invade or deprave public morals through over-sex. there is no doubt-and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 1990 (HC)

Ganapati Mankalu Gouda Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR1248; 1990(1)KarLJ342

..... to extend the arable land and therefore he wanted to cut and remove the trees in order to bring the land covered by the tree growth under plough. in that behalf he made an application to the tree officer under section 8 of the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976. that application was made on 30-4-1986. but, no action ..... was taken by the tree officer having jurisdiction. the tree officer having jurisdiction is the second respondent-deputy conservator of forests, yellapura division, yellapura, uttar kannada ..... if he had been given permission in view of clause (ii) of sub-section (4) of section 8 of the act. his grievance began when he wanted to transport the trees so felled by him. the second respondent has refused to issue passes for transportation inter alia on the ground that they have been cut .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 1988 (HC)

J Adiveppa Babappa Hulasera Vs. Divisional Forest Officer

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1989KAR1228; 1988(3)KarLJ211

..... land grant rules'). they have also sought for a declaration that permission as required under sub-section (4) of section 8 of the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 'trees act') must be deemed to have been granted to them. they have sought for a further direction to respondents 1 and 2 to restrain them ..... a specified period. in case, the petitioners pay the value of the trees as assessed by the authorities of the forest department (respondents 1 and 2) they will be entitled to seek permission to cut and remove the trees under the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 and cut and remove the trees as per the permission granted under the said ..... on the lands granted to them. it is only when such right accrues, the question of making an application under section 8 of the trees act for permission to cut and remove the trees will arise. in the instant case, the petitioners have not yet acquired such a right. even if an application is made without a right .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 1988 (HC)

Jose Chake Manakattu Vs. the Tree Officer and Deputy Conservator of Fo ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1989Kant189; 1988(1)KarLJ380

..... , the following question of law arises for consideration :whether a person who has cut the trees standing on his own land, in contravention of the provisions of the karnataka preservation of trees act 1976 ('the act' for short), is liable to pay the value of the trees in adition to the compounding fees payable under cl. (a) of s. 21(l) ..... of the act?2. this petition has come up for preliminary hearing after notice to the respondents. ..... or occupied by the person concerned. the law is enacted for the purpose of preservation of trees whether they stand on the government land or private land. according to the provisions of the act, no tree can be cut with out permission. therefore, once a tree is cut without permission whether it is situate on a government land or a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2000 (HC)

State of Karnataka and Others Vs. B. Krishna Bhat and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2001KAR2030; 2001(2)KarLJ1

..... trees near overhead electrical lines, have been either overlooked or ignored. though the forest act, 1963 does not contemplate officers of the forest department supervising the pruning of ..... , keb is blamed for everything. we are criticised for trimming trees, and we are criticised for letting them grow, causing electrical accidents. a set of clippings from the press is enclosed'.but, the said reply has not been considered. further, the provisions of indian electricity act, 1910, preservation of trees act, 1976 and indian telegraph act, 1885 which have a bearing on trimming or cutting of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 2008 (HC)

Siddeshwara International Vs. State of Karnataka Represented by Its Se ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR1356; 2009(3)KCCRSN99; 2009(4)AIRKarR367

..... width on steep slops, at times on slope exceeding 45 degree duly clearing the thick forest growth on his patta land in violation of karnataka preservation of trees act 1976, forest conservation act 1980, environmental protection act 1986 and rules there in. it was stated by sri ks sai baba, conservator of forests, chikmagalur circle that this new road was ..... international, extending to about 280 acres consists of thick forest mostly on steep sloppy area. this area of 280 acres adjoins the yemmedoddi tiger preserve (section-4 notified forest under karnataka forest act 1963) on south -western side and surrounded by section-4 proposed area of about 2341 acres on east, north and western sides. the ..... his inspection of the area on 5/8/2006 and against the clear instructions to the mine in charge not to remove any trees and vegetation in the area in violation of various acts stated as above. these new roads are opened up covering the 280 acres of patta land with mine trial pits here and there .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //