Practice - Judgment Search Results

Director General (investigation Vs. Colgate Palmolive (i) Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... competition in any manner section 2 o reads thus section 2 o restrictive trade practice means a trade practice which has or may have the effect of preventing distorting or restricting competition ..... or destroying competition that it is liable to be regarded as a restrictive trade practice if a trade practice merely regulates and thereby promotes competition it would not fall within the definition of .....

Vijay Somani Vs. Capt. Ajay Singh

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2002P& H215

..... allegedto have committed such corrupt practicesand the date and place of commission of thealleged corrupt practices while making areference to material facts the mandate ofsection 83 of the 1951 act ..... accompanied by an affidavit duly sworn by the applicant duly verifying diverse allegations of corrupt practices imputed to the returned candidate and attested by the prescribed authority it would be .....

Lorillard Tobacco Co. Vs. Reilly

Court: US Supreme Court

..... d the attorney general also promulgated a number of regulations that restrict sales practices by cigarette smokeless tobacco and cigar manufacturers and retailers among other restrictions the ..... of a magazine through newsracks these regulations withstand first amendment scrutiny massachusetts sales practices provisions regulate conduct that may have a communicative component but massachusetts seeks to .....

Vinod Chopra Vs. Film Makers Combine

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... section 2 o of the mrtf act such trade practices are also deemed to be prejudicial to public interest unless the gateways given ..... has already been withdrawn the impugned restrictive trade practice has ceased to exist therefore it is not necessry to pass a cease order ..... said to have admitted the charge of restrictive trade practices and therefore it is not necessary to go deeper into the facts of .....

Director General (investigation Vs. R.K. JaIn and Company and anr.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... considering the fir a notice of enquiry noe under section 36 b d of the mrtp act was issued to the respondents although several opportunities were given the respondents did not file ..... that the common consumers are likely to be adversely affected by the alleged unfair trade practices therefore we consider it appropriate to proceed further with the case and decide it on .....

Madura Coats Ltd. Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... the question of the applicant having suffered any loss on account of such restrictive trade practices and hence claiming compensation for the same does not arise 13 in view of the ..... for the purposes of any proceedings before the commission under section 37 a restrictive trade practice shall be deemed to be prejudicial to the public interest unless the commission is satisfied .....

Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... of the securities and exchange board of india prohibition of fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to securities market regulations 1995 the regulations against the appellant through its directors ..... is the core chapter in the regulation titled prohibition of fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to securities market regulation 3 thereunder prohibits any person from buying selling or .....

Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. Vs. West Virginia Dept. of Health ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... are ordinarily required to bear their own attorney s fees and courts follow a general practice of not awarding fees to a prevailing party absent explicit statutory authority key tronic corp ..... society 421 u s 240 247 1975 under this american rule we follow a general practice of not awarding fees to a prevailing party absent explicit statutory authority key tronic corp .....

Atwater Vs. Lago Vista

Court: US Supreme Court

..... officers broad warrantless misdemeanor arrest authority undermines atwater s position given the early state practice it is likewise troublesome for atwater s view that one year after the fourth ..... itself underscores the probability that the constitutional provision was intended to restrict entirely different practices watson 423 u s at 429 powell j concurring see also amar fourth amendment .....

Dr. Kaisar Ahmad Vs. State and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2002CriLJ907

..... other provisions act 1983 hereinafter act of 1983 on allegation of indulgence in private practice during office hours in private clinics for illegal pecuniary considerations by the alleged ..... fraudulent and illegal medical private practice during office hours he has abused his position as public servant thereby opened himself .....