Practice - Judgment Search Results

Pennwalt (i) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1999Delhi23; [1999]97CompCas163(Delhi); 74(1998)DLT422; 1998(46)DRJ434

..... detriment for the control of monopolies for the prohibition of monopolistic and restrictive trade practices and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto it comprises of nine chapters chapter ..... performance of its functions under the act chapter ii of the monopolies and restrictive practices commission regulations 1991 deals with the preliminary investigation regulation 17 is as follows 17 .....

Hmm Ltd. Vs. Director General, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998VIAD(SC)214; AIR1998SC2691; [1998]94CompCas132(SC); JT1998(5)SC433; 1998(4)SCALE490; (1998)6SCC485

..... dated 11th may 1989 passed by the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission hereinafter referred to as the commission it held that ..... following issues i whether the respondent indulged in the unfair trade practices as alleged in the application of the d g and ..... decided accordingly against the respondent 9 section 36a defines unfair trade practice so far as is relevant it reads in this part .....

Alkali Manufacturers Vs. Sinochem International

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... say that it shall not amount to restrictive trade practice trade practices enumerated in clauses a to 1 of sub section ..... have been statutorily determined and specified as restrictive trade practices neither the commission nor the court can question the ..... of parliament in having statutorily determined certain trade practices as restrictive trade practices unless in this process there is a contravention .....

Pfaff Vs. Wells Electronics, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... period justifies a special interpretation of invention in 102 b is rejected while reduction to practice provides sufficient evidence that an invention is complete the facts of the telephone cases and ..... on sale within the meaning of the statute until after it had been reduced to practice iii pfaff nevertheless argues that longstanding precedent buttressed by the strong interest in providing inventors .....

Ortiz Vs. Fibreboard Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... filings continuing unabated and its secure insurance assets almost depleted fibreboard in 1988 began a practice of structured settlement paying plaintiffs 40 percent of the settlement figure up front with the ..... committee intended subdivision b l to capture the standard class actions recognized in pre rule practice kaplan continuing work 394 consistent with its backward look under subdivision b l as .....

Monterey Vs. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... condemnation and a suit like this one finally the existence of a different historical practice distinguishes direct condemnation from an ordinary tort case in which the defendant concedes liability ..... conclusion is consistent with the original understanding of the takings clause and with historical practice early opinions nearly contemporaneous with the adoption of the bill of rights suggested that .....

Director-general Vs. Daewoo Motors India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... general under section 10 of the mrtp act 14 in view of our aforesaid discussion we are of the opinion that we were ..... section 10 a iii of the mrtp act the noe against respondent no 2 therefore deserves to be discharged 15 in the result ..... of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission regulations 1991 the civil procedure code is made applicable where no specific provision has been made .....

Kunj Bihari Sanghi Vs. Hindustan Motors Ltd. and anr.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... satisfaction should not be construed as adoption of unfair trade practices by it it has been further stated that it ..... allegations clearly fall under section 36a and constitute unfair trade practices issue no 1 regarding the maintainability of the complaint application ..... the affirmative in other words the allegations of unfair trade practices on the part of the respondents are fully substantiated .....

Consumer Education and Research Vs. S.K.F. Bearings India Ltd. and

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... not a consumer for the purposes of the mrtp act as contended by and on behalf of the respondents similarly we do not propose to ..... of the summary remedy provided by and under the mrtp act would be frustrated for adjudication and resolution of such acute disputes of facts between ..... and indulgence in restrictive and or unfair trade practices on the part of the respondents as the defendants therein 17 it may be .....

Director-general Vs. All Gujarat Distillery

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1989)65CompCas644NULL

..... general also made on application under section 12a of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act 1969 the act for brief for restraining the respondent association its office bearers ..... 1993 it has been stated that the enquiry pending before the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission has also become infructuous in the changed circumstances and the injunction order restraining .....