Practicable - Judgment Search Results

Ballarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. the Director General of Investigation an ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1989Delhi329; [1988]64CompCas884(Delhi); ILR1988Delhi10a

..... trade interests of its membes orof persons presented by its members 10 trade practice means any practice relaring to thecarrying on of any trade and includes i anything done by ..... common detriment turn the control ofmonopolies for the prohibition of monopolistic and restrictive trade practices and such other matters connected therewith orincidental thereto it is thereforee difficult to comprehend .....

Lyng Vs. Northwest Indian Cemetery

Court: US Supreme Court

..... at issue in this case could have devastating effects on traditional indian religious practices those practices are intimately and inextricably bound up with the unique features of the chimney ..... citizens suffer when governmental action not only offends but actually restrains their religious practices here respondents have demonstrated that the government s proposed activities will completely prevent .....

Director-general of Vs. Investwell Publishers (P.) Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1990)69CompCas516NULL

..... the commission therefore framed the following preliminary issue has the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission no jurisdiction to hear and decide the application of the director general and ..... same the respondent is also destabilising competition and misguiding the public by these trade practices as the respondent in its tetter dated 7th march 1987 has mentioned capital market .....

Watson Vs. Fort Worth Bank and Trust

Court: US Supreme Court

..... this court s decisions applying disparate impact analysis under which facially neutral employment practices adopted without a deliberately discriminatory motive may in operation be functionally equivalent ..... rather the necessary premise of the disparate impact approach is that some employment practices adopted without a deliberately discriminatory motive may in operation be functionally equivalent to .....

Supreme Court of Virginia Vs. Friedman

Court: US Supreme Court

..... maintain an office in virginia this requirement facilitates compliance with the full time practice requirement in nearly the identical manner that the residency restriction does rendering the ..... requirement that applicants maintain an office in virginia facilitates compliance with the full time practice requirement in nearly the identical manner that the residency restriction does rendering the .....

Sun Oil Co. Vs. Wortman

Court: US Supreme Court

..... tradition in place when the constitutional provision was adopted and subsequent and subsisting general practice establish that a state has legislative jurisdiction to control the remedies available in its ..... nothing unusual about our approach this court has regularly relied on traditional and subsisting practice in determining the constitutionally permissible authority of courts see e g young v united .....

Director-general of Vs. National Institute of

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... application under section 36b c of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act the respondent also issued a prospectus photostat copy of ..... of section 12a 2 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act an ex parte injunction can be issued if delay in ..... under section 36b c of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act 18 as required by rule 3 order xxxix civil procedure code .....

Director-general of Vs. All Gujarat Distillery

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... director general of investigation and registration under section 12a of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act 1969 praying for an ex parte ad interim injunction against the respondents the director general ..... higher prices we think that prima facie these respondents have indulged in the restrictive trade practice of manipulation of price of ethyl alcohol in such a manner as to impose .....

J.P. Sharma Vs. Reliance Petrochemicals Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... market has moved this complaint under section 36b a of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act 1969 praying that an enquiry be instituted against reliance petrochemicals ltd hereinafter referred to ..... per annum of pvc with permission under section 22 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act for the establishment of a new industrial undertaking ril has also approval for .....

Director-general of Vs. Mrs. Kamlesh Thaper

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1988)64CompCas109NULL

..... investigation his investigation revealed that the respondent was indulging in the following unfair trade practices by making all false claims i in the advertisement the respondent has claimed that ..... we therefore issue ex parte temporary injunction restraining the respondent from indulging in unfair trade practices by way of making false and misleading representations in any manner whether in the .....