Practicable - Judgment Search Results

Motor Industries Co. Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practic ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1986KAR2844

..... of trade and commerce and to see that the monopolistic and restrictive trade practices are not practices so that the trade and commerce can flourish without any hamper it is ..... application before the first respondent under regulation 66 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission regulations 1972 hereinafter referred to as the regulation for separating the allegations contained .....

Motor Industries Company Limited Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1990]67CompCas418(Kar)

..... dated september 20 1982 made under regulation 66 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission regulations 1974 ii to issue a writ of certiorari quashing the notice ..... application before the fisrt respondent under regulation 66 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practice commission regulations 1974 hereinafter referred to as the regulation for separating the allegations contained .....

Director-general of Vs. India Cements Limited

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1987)62CompCas382NULL

..... e director general investigation and registration the respondent is indulging in the following restrictive trade practices as are ascertainable from the different terms of the agreement as well as the standard ..... than the one desired 24 the real basis of banning the monopolistic and restrictive trade practices is to ensure competition among private business enterprises the object to be achieved is .....

In Re: Avon Cycles P. Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1986)60CompCas1036NULL

..... while this question is undoubtedly relevant a more fundamental issue is whether the trade practice of resorting to contests lotteries and similar methods which are increasingly being adopted by ..... better services to the consumers in general will enhance consumer satisfaction 17 secondly the practice of offering prizes by lottery tends to encourage the gambling instinct leading to unnecessary .....

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Kores India Limited

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... other than the accredited ones are allowed annual bonus it is alleged that the trade practices of allowing special discount to the 17 dealers and differential annual bonus to others amounts ..... adverse effect on competition under section 38 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act the restrictive trade practice is to be presumed to be prejudicial to public interest unless the commission .....

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1986)18ITD64(Mum.)

..... or market price even though this is only a practice this practice has been exalted to the level of a rule ..... calcutta high court was whether long standing commercial and accountancy practices followed by the assessee should be rejected their lordships has ..... method it must be one recognised by accounting practice and sanctioned by commercial practice the method adopted and regularly followed over the .....

Sheet Metal Workers Vs. Eeoc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... commission commenced other state court proceedings in an effort to end petitioners discriminatory practices petitioners had originally agreed to indenture two successive classes of apprentices using ..... had denied qualified nonwhites access to union membership through a variety of discriminatory practices first the court found that petitioners had adopted discriminatory procedures and standards .....

Firefighters Vs. City of Cleveland

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that congress strongly encouraged employers to act on a voluntary basis to modify employment practices and systems page 478 u s 516 which constituted barriers to equal employment opportunity ..... to protect employers against themselves but to protect applicants and employees from racially discriminatory practices there is no statutory authority for concluding that if an employer desires to discriminate .....

Thornburg Vs. Gingles

Court: US Supreme Court

..... large election districts majority vote requirements anti single shot provisions or other voting practices or procedures that may enhance the opportunity for discrimination against the minority group ..... legally significant racially polarized voting requires discrete inquiries into minority and white voting practices a showing that a significant number of minority group members usually vote for .....

LA. Pub. Svc. Comm'n Vs. FCC

Court: US Supreme Court

..... importance of depreciation to ratemaking to require state regulators to follow fcc depreciation practices would frustrate the statutory design of preserving the states ratemaking authority over intrastate ..... hardly have been necessary to deny the fcc the jurisdiction over charges classifications practices services facilities or regulations for or in connection with intrastate communication service .....