Pose - Judgment Search Results

Vaijayanthi Vs. Mary

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2004(2)KLT934

pius c kuriakose j 1 plaintiffs 3 4 and 6 are the legal representatives of deceased plaintiffs 2 and 5...

Joseph Vs. District Collector

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2004(2)KLT1029

pius c kuriakose j a question of considerable importance arises for decision in this writ petition the question is whether...

Krishnan Nair Vs. Vasudeva Panicker

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2004(3)KLT124

pius c kuriakose j 1 the defendants 2 to 5 and one of the legal representatives of the deceased first...

Kamalakshi Amma Vs. Special Tahsildar

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2004(2)KLT716

pius c kuriakose j 1 this appeal is against the judgment of the reference court in a reference under section...

Raghava Poduval Vs. Special Tahsildar

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2004(3)KLT261

pius c kuriakose j 1 the grievance of die appellant is that the land acquisition officer dismissed the application under...

Abdul Rasheed Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2005(1)KLT5

pius c kuriakose j 1 this writ petition has been filed seeking to quash ext p3 order by which the...

Reeta George Vs. Special Tahsildar

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2005(1)KLT79

pius c kuriakose j 1 the grievance of the petitioner whose properties were acquired under the land acquisition act for...

Purushan Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2005(1)KLT687

pius c kuriakose j 1 the important question raised for determination in this appeal is the question as to whether...

A (Fc) and Others (Fc) (Appellants) Vs. Secretary of State for the Hom ...

Court: House of Lords

..... absence of any satisfactory evidence that members of the two groups posed substantially different threats the judgment of the government and of ..... that conclusion 186 if then as siac concluded the threat posed by the foreign and british suspects was comparable one would ..... be strictly required either to meet the comparable threat that they pose the second requirement of article 15 1 is accordingly not .....

Hamdi Vs. Rumsfeld

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the government s interest may be in detaining those who actually pose an immediate threat to the national security of the united ..... inappropriate in the enemy combatant setting the threats to military operations posed by a basic system of independent review are not so ..... could become available to the government showing that such access would pose a grave risk to national security in that event would .....