Pose - Judgment Search Results

Aley Antony Vs. Ouseph Chacko

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2004(2)KLT867

pius c kuriakose j 1 this proceeding under section 103 of the kerala land reforms act for short the act...

ito Vs. Surinder Cycles (P) Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Reported in: (2004)90TTJ(Chd.)723

phis appeal of the revenue has been directed against the order of commissioner appeals dated 23 3 1998 brief facts...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shiv Dayal Radhey Shyam

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: [2003]259ITR147(Raj)

1 on an application filed under section 256 1 of the income tax act 1961 the tribunal has referred the...

Chevron U.S. A. Inc. Vs. Echazabal

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the defense that a worker s disability on the job would pose a direct threat to his health the district court granted ..... with business necessity and reasonable accommodation would not cure the difficulty posed by employment 42 u s c 12113 a without more those ..... qualification standards may include a requirement that an individual shall not pose a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals .....

Watchtower Bible and Tract Soc. of N. Y., Inc. Vs. Village of Stratton

Court: US Supreme Court

..... fraud and undue annoyance and its desire to prevent criminals from posing as canvassers in order to defraud its residents were sufficient ..... legitimate interest served by these ordinances and noted that burglars frequently pose as canvassers either in order that they may have a ..... largely impotent to address the very real safety threat that canvassers pose and may actually result in less of the door to .....

Kelly Vs. South Carolina

Court: US Supreme Court

..... eminent good sense for when the state argues that the defendant poses a threat to his cellmates or prison guards it is no answer ..... simmons invited to infer that petitioner is a vicious predator who would pose a continuing threat to the community simmons supra at 176 it ..... before us it is not that the state court failed to pose the legal issue accurately for in considering the applicability of simmons .....

Beandk; Constr. Co. Vs. Nlrb

Court: US Supreme Court

..... issue punitive remedies at most those arguments show that the nlra poses less of a burden on petitioning not that its burdens raise ..... resulting illegality finding is a burden by itself the finding also poses a threat of reputational harm that is 518 syllabus different and ..... these arguments demonstrate that the threat of an antitrust suit may pose a greater burden on petitioning than the threat of an .....

Cit Vs. Mool Chand Salecha

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (2002)174CTR(Raj)1

..... account books or documents 12 in order to answer the question posed it will be desirable to set out some of the relevant ..... survey it is necessary to set out section 133a however the question posed cannot be answered properly unless section 131 is also read along ..... 1996 has arisen for consideration 19 in order to appreciate the question posed it will be convenient to read section 245a to 245f which .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mool Chand Salecha

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2003(2)Raj1303; 2002(5)WLN346

..... account books or documents 9 in order to answer the question posed it will be desirable to set out some of the relevant ..... it is necessary to set out section 133a however the question posed cannot be answered properly unless section 131 is also read along ..... 1996 has arisen for consideration 16 in order to appreciate the question posed it will be convenient to readsections 245a to 245f which provide .....

R.K. Salhotra Vs. Ito

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: [2002]125TAXMAN624(NULL)

..... corporation is exempt iii that as to whether while deciding the question posed at serial nos i and ii above the circular issued by ..... implementation of the statute 9 in view of the above the question posed at serial no iii is answered in favour of the appellant ..... duties or to procure extra business for the corporation 17 the questions posed at serial no i and ii are answered accordingly 18 this appeal .....