Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry extension of laws act 1968 section 5 extension of rules orders etc under certain laws Sorted by: recent Page 15 of about 387 results (1.532 seconds)

Oct 05 1995 (HC)

M.P. Electricity Board Vs. M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ629

..... in fact was not resolved. the opinion of verma, j. supports the contention of the petitioner. counsel also cited the decision : k. s. ramamurthy v. chief commissioner, pondicherry, air 1963 sc 1464; a. m. mani v. state electricity board, air 1968 kerala 76; andhra pradesh state electricity board v. n. r. rao, air 1964 a ..... coordinating development, generation, supply and distribution of electricity, etc., in accordance with provisions and scheme of the act. it is also invested by the act with extensive power of control over electricity undertakings. it can make rules and regulations to administer its functioning in accordance with the provisions of the act. the board for all ..... adhiniyam will apply and the arbitration tribunal will have jurisdiction to decide the reference petition for passing an award under section 16 of the adhiniyam in accordance with law. however, it would be appropriate to refer the definition of 'public undertaking' under section 2(l)(g) as it stood prior to 24-4-1990 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 1995 (HC)

Kannu Reddiar Vs. T. Palanirajan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1996)1MLJ118

..... building industry under the name and style of m/s. cholan industries by availing financial assistance by way of loan to an extent of rs. 2.88 lakhs from the pondicherry industrial promotion development and investment corporation (hereinafter referred to as pipdic). in this regard, the deceased plaintiff p. nirmala's husband viz., the 1st respondent herein, who happened to ..... act fairly, justly, equitably and without undue haste, that took in a manner to enable the aggrieved parties to pursue their legal remedies provided by the procedures established by law. the courts while passing orders should not be carried away with any prejudice against any party. the courts are expected to discharge their duties without fear or favour, affection ..... from 27.8.19 81. therefore, as rightly pointed out by mr. g. masilamani, as on 25.3.1982 viz., ex. a-16, there was no need for any extension of the lease deed ex. a-1. further, a reading of the recitals in ex. a-16 reveals that the same was not one for .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 1995 (SC)

Maharashtra Rajya Mathadi Transport and Central Kamgar Union Vs. State ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1995SC1575; [1995(71)FLR485]; JT1995(4)SC558; (1996)ILLJ862SC; 1995(3)SCALE176; 1995Supp(3)SCC28; [1995]3SCR920

ORDERN. Venkatachala, J. 1. Are 'Hundekaris' entitled to get registered with the Vegetable Market Labour Board of Greater Bombay - 'the Board' as 'Employers' under Clause 14 of the Vegetable Markets Unprotected Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Scheme, 1985- 'the Scheme' made by the Government of Maharashtra under Section 4(1) of the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969- 'the Act' is the short question that arises for our consideration in this appeal by special leave filed by Mathadi Workers Union - the appellant.2. The factual background in which the said question arises for our consideration is the following:3. Mathadi workers are the members of the appellant-Union. They are unprotected workers' who carry out the manual work in vegetable markets (including onions and potatoes markets) connected with loading, unloading, stacking, carrying, weighing, measuring, filing, stitching, sorting, cleaning of vegetable...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1995 (SC)

Miss Radha Bai Vs. Union Territory of Pondicherry Represented by Its C ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1995SC1476; JT1995(4)SC34; 1995LabIC1818; 1995(2)SCALE842; (1995)4SCC141; [1995]3SCR561; 1995(2)SLJ235(SC)

..... send the copy of this order to chief secretary and district judge, pondicherry before 9.8.94.3. the enquiry by the district judge, pondicherry, unfortunately took some time and this court granted extension of time for submitting the report. there is only one district judge in pondicherry. he has submitted a report containing 40 pages (56 paragraphs). in ..... be borne in mind in appreciating the testimony of the victims of sexual offences. in bharwada bhoginbhai hirjibhai v. state of gujarat : 1983crilj1096 this court stated the law thus:on principle the evidence of a victim of sexual assault stands on par with evidence of an injured witness. just as a witness who has sustained an ..... learned district judge is to the effect that the evidence (statements) of the appellant are not corroborated by other material. it is rather surprising that the law laid down by this court in a series of decisions from 1952 as to whether there is any need to insist upon corroboration to the testimony of prosecutrix .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1995 (SC)

Municipal Corporation for City of Pune and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1996SC2856; JT1995(3)SC312; 1995(2)SCALE245; (1995)3SCC434a; [1995]2SCR716; (1995)2UPLBEC740

..... relevant for our purpose, because in that case a two-judge bench of this court had upheld the delegation as contained in section 3 of cantonment (extension of rent control laws) act, 1957, by which the central government by a notification in official gazette could extend to any cantonment any enactment relating to control of rent which ..... bhushan then places reliance on b. shama rap v. union territory ofpondicherry : [1967]2scr650 . there, the particular act of pondicherry legislative assembly was held to be an abdication or effacement by the law making authority inasmuch as it had by the act in question allowed the amendments to be made in the parallel madras statute to ..... prevail in pondicherry without knowing what those amendments would be shri shanti bhushan contends that same would be the position .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 1995 (HC)

Kemi Kwaja Mohideen Vs. Susan Galife

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1995)2MLJ20

..... basis of the endorsement or on the basis of the agreement reached between the parties. i can only say that the principal district munsif, pondicherry, rent controller has failed to appreciate that the law is well-settled by catena of the decisions of the supreme court as well as this court that the order of eviction passed on ..... against the tenant, was also compromised on the basis of the endorsement made by the tenant. the view of the learned principal district munsif that since under the pondicherry buildings (lease and rent control) act, a rent controller can grant only three months time and since the rent controller has granted three years time in the instant ..... the entire petition premises to the landlord on or before the said date viz., 5th june, 1969 without fail under any circumstances and undertakes not to apply for extension of time. it was agreed by both parties that the memo of compromise was executable as a decree of court. the compromise petition was signed by both the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 1994 (HC)

Tvl. Cholan Roadways, Corporation Ltd. Kumbakonam and Etc. Etc. Vs. Tv ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1995Mad129a

..... consideration. by consent of both parties, all of them were heard together. the writ petitions were filed as against the order of the state transport appellate tribunal, pondicherry (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal) dismissing the appeals filed by the respective petitioner/ corporation (hereinafter referred to as the corporation) as against the order of ..... to section 57(3) of the old act notification. it was contended before the authority on behalf of the corporation that the route for which the extension now sought for was covered by the scheme route and no variation could be granted on any overlapped route pursuant to the directions of the hon'ble ..... the corporation is maintainable and the tribunal is not justified in dismissing the appeal as not maintainable on the threshold itself and consequently it suffers from error of law requiring the intervention of this court.10. with regard to the second contention, mr. m. palani, learned counsel for the corporation would submit that even .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 1994 (HC)

K. Vaithianathan and Etc. Vs. the Union of Territory of Pondicherry an ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1995Mad197

..... they are operating on the inter-state route pondichery to villupuram via, ariyur and kandamangalam. the third respondent is an operator on the inter-state route pondicherry to tiruvennainallur, via. villaianur. pakkani cross road, kariamanckam, madagadipet and valavanur. as per the permit conditions.she has to operate two singles on the ..... very question was raised, viz., that were a regional transport authority is proceeding with thefixation of timings in respect of a sanctioned routed and that extension or variation relates to the territorial jurisdiction of another regional transport authority, the counter-signature of that latter authority must be obtained, before convening the ..... respondents 1 and 2 to prevent the third respondent from running on the varied route without counter signature and without fixation of timings in accordance with law.6. in meeting the above arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner, mr. m. krishanappan, learned counsel for the third respondent, says .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1993 (HC)

Jagriti Vs. the State and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1994AP225; 1994(1)ALT376

..... constitutes an essential feature cannot be enunciated in general terms. but this much is clear that it cannot include a change of policy.'the court found that extension of section 104 of the bihar and orissa municipal act, 1922 to the patna village by notification dt. 23-4-1951 without complying with the formalities imposed ..... act which extended the madras general sales tax act (1 of 1959) as it stood immediately before the date on which the pondicherry act would be brought into force in the territory of pondicherry by a notification issued by the government as provided in section 1(2) was void and still born, because the pondicherrylegislature in ..... speaking through kirshna lyer, j. upheld the provisions of punjab excise act read with punjab liquor licence rules 1956 as amended in 1978 holding that 'as abkari law is not a prohibition act with a mission of total prohibition. the obvious object is to balance temperance with tax, to condition and curtail consumption without liquidating the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 1993 (HC)

Justice S.T. Ramalingam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Another

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1994Mad252; (1994)IMLJ260

..... of the high court alone but extends to the entire state of tamil nadu and, besides the state of tamil nadu, to the entire territory of the state of pondicherry. in their counter affidavit, respondents 1 and 2 have said categorically that to enable the drivers attached to the ministers to attend to office or residence of the ministers ..... territories in the state. hon'ble judges of this court have complete control of the administration of justice in the state of tamil nadu as well as the state of pondicherry with areas scattered beyond the territories of the states of andhra pradesh and kerala. the government of tamil nadu, which has got the responsibilities under the high court judges ..... of the staff of the high court, it has also observed that it is clearly a mistake both of fact and of law in not recognising the jurisdiction of the hon'ble judges of this court co-extensive with the territory of the state when in fact the hon'ble judges of this court exercise jurisdiction not only in the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //