Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry extension of laws act 1968 section 5 extension of rules orders etc under certain laws Page 7 of about 387 results (0.158 seconds)

JasmIn Roadways, Pondicherry Vs. Transport Commissioner, Madras

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1997Mad251

..... nadu in g.o.ms. no.3/85, dated 9-3-1985 and the route in question is covered by serial no. 69, vi/.., marakanam to karayambathur (via) pondicherry, thavalakuppan, karikalampakkam, bahour kannikoil bahour, kuruvinatham and krishnavaram. mr. v. t. gopalan, learned senior counsel invited the attention of this court to clause iv of the inter ..... in the inter-state agreement. the benefit of single point tax will also apply in respect of routes findingplace in the basic agreement irrespective of any variation, extension, curtailment or pattern of trips that may be allowed on future, dates. the concession shall also apply in respect of spare buses with valid counter-signature for ..... directing the petitioner topay the motor vehicle tax' during thematerial period viz., 3-5-1993 to 12-7-1994once again to'the state of tamil nadu isunsustainable in law and is liable to bequashed by this court. 8. on the other hand, the learned additional government pleader mr. p. raja-manickam invited the attention of .....

Rangaswamy @ Govindaram (Died) 5 ors. Vs. the Deputy Collector (Revenu ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(2)CTC97; (1997)IIMLJ662

..... and the learned single judge had held therein that in the absence of a specific extension of the limitation act to the union territory of pondicherry by virtue of extension of the provisions of the code of civil procedure with effect from 1.8.1966, the law of limitation, namely limitation act, 1963, also cannot be considered to have been ..... extended or that it became automatically applicable or enforceable in the union territory of pondicherry. in coming to such ..... as the date on which the provisions of act 15 of 1994 shall come into force in the whole of the union territory of pondicherry. in view of the above, the local law, namely, the french civil code in so far as it relates to the relevant provision pertaining to the period of limitation visualised under article .....

Rengasamy @ Govindasamy (Died) and ors. Vs. Deputy Collector (Revenue) ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(3)CTC731

..... the learned single judge had held therein that in the absence of a specific extension of the limitation act to the union territory of pondicherry by virtue of extension of the provisions of the code of civil procedure with effect from 1.8.1966, the law of limitation, namely limitation act, 1963, also cannot be considered to have been ..... extended or that it became automatically applicable enforceable in the union territory of pondicherry. in coming to such, a ..... 1995 as the date on which the provision of act 15 of 1994 shall come into force in the whole of the union territory of pondicherry. inview of the above, the local law, namely, the french code civil in so far as it relates to the relevant provision pertaining to the period of limitation visualised under article .....

Suryagandhi Vs. Lourduswamy

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2004Mad8; 2003(1)ARBLR234(Madras); (2002)3MLJ788

..... then the suit instituted after nine years is barred by limitation. the construction placed on art.54 by the lower appellate court cannot be sustained in law.38. the pondicherry limitation (repeal of local laws) act, 1994 is being relied upon by the counsel for the plaintiff to save the limitation period. section 3 of the said act provides that ..... pleaded by the parties. it is a bar to jurisdiction of court. the repugnancy and incongruity arise by reason of the fact that parliament by law viz. the high court at bombay: (extension of jurisdiction to goa, daman and diu) act, 1981 extended the jurisdiction of the high court of judicature at bombay to the union territory of ..... to the defendant calling upon the latter to execute a sale deed. there was no correspondence during this period between the plaintiff and the defendant with regard to extension of time for completion of the contract and there is nothing to show that anything was done by the plaintiff to keep alive the agreement of sale. in .....

R.Balasubramanian .. Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu, and anr.

Court : Chennai

..... 7.2.2003 and 16.4.2003, had recorded, with appreciation, the volume of judicial work turned out by the petitioner as additional district judge of pondicherry at karaikal.12.expatiating his submissions, the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner contends that the recommendations of the administrative committee of the honourable high court ..... the considered opinion that the finding of the learned judge is fit to be accepted. accordingly, the committee hereby accepts the report. the matter relating to the extension or otherwise of mr.r.balasubramnian, principal district judge, pudukottai, who is attaining the age of 50 years, under f.r.56(2) came up ..... district judge-cum-chief judicial magistrate, dindigul, with ulterior motive, thus committed the acts of misuse of power, abuse of power and abuse of process of law and conduct unbecoming of a judicial officer and thereby rendered yourself liable to be punished under the tamil nadu civil services (discipline and appeal) rules".18. .....

Sri Padmavathi Modern Rice Mill and ors. Vs. the Government of Puduche ...

Court : Chennai

..... to withdraw the incentive retrospectively, after the petitioner had acted on it. in case, notification is taken to have been issued, in exercise of powers under the pondicherry paddy and rice procurement (levy) order, 1996, it could not be withdrawn, being statutory obligation under section 3 of the essential commodities act to take relevant ..... that the government of india, vide letter no. 167(51)/2008-py-1 dated 13.10.2010, while accepting the request of government of puducherry for extension of delivery of single boiled rice for kms 2009-10 for two months beyond 30th of september, 2010, had categorically observed that the provisional price was subject ..... thereunder must be presumed to be prospective unless the retrospectivity is indicated either expressly or by necessary implication. it is a principle 24 of rule of law. a presumption can be raised that a statute or statutory rules has prospective operation only."60. learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents opposed .....

Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry and Others Vs. State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai

..... 41. in paragraphs 16 to 18 of this decision this is what is held:- 16. what were the "things done" by the petitioners under the pondicherry law? the petitioners in the course of their import trade, having obtained authorization for the foreign exchange through their bankers, entered into firm contracts with foreign dealers ..... the repeal of the principal act, prohibiting registration of conveyances in respect of flats constructed under schemes sanctioned under section 20 and sold without obtaining extension of periods of completion of the schemes or obtaining no objection certificates from the competent authority under the principal act. according to the petitioners in ..... with these objects and peculiar facts and circumstances of each case that the state allowed the exemption to remain in force. that at appropriate stages the extensions to the exemption orders have been granted. therefore, if the exemption is granted firstly in public interest and secondly to relieve the undue hardship, then .....

K. Vaithianathan and Etc. Vs. the Union of Territory of Pondicherry an ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1995Mad197

..... they are operating on the inter-state route pondichery to villupuram via, ariyur and kandamangalam. the third respondent is an operator on the inter-state route pondicherry to tiruvennainallur, via. villaianur. pakkani cross road, kariamanckam, madagadipet and valavanur. as per the permit conditions.she has to operate two singles on the ..... very question was raised, viz., that were a regional transport authority is proceeding with thefixation of timings in respect of a sanctioned routed and that extension or variation relates to the territorial jurisdiction of another regional transport authority, the counter-signature of that latter authority must be obtained, before convening the ..... respondents 1 and 2 to prevent the third respondent from running on the varied route without counter signature and without fixation of timings in accordance with law.6. in meeting the above arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner, mr. m. krishanappan, learned counsel for the third respondent, says .....

Deepak Kumar Panda Vs. National Aluminium Company Limited and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1996(II)OLR619

..... affidavit through the assistant personnel manager, disputing the claim of the petitioner on several grounds while admitting the factum of appointment, continuance till 1-1-1990 and extension/renewal of contract of service in respect of persons so appointed alongwith him even his juniors. it is, inter alia, stated that the petitioner's appointment ..... interpreter in nationa aluminium company limited from february, 1980 till december, 1989 oh contract basis, challenges the action of the opp parties in not granting him renewal/extension of service, even though, persons similarly placed and even his juniors have been allowed to continue. the further grievance of the petitioner is that his representation ..... section 2(oo)(bb) of the industrial disputes act. it is claimed that in view of the provisions of law after expiry of the period of appointment if an employee is not given any extension or renewal of service then it will not amount to retrenchment nor the principle of first come last go will .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. T. Narayanaswami Pather

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1998]229ITR529(Mad)

..... voluntarily produced the account books. the tribunal also noticed that it was the second year of extension of indian tax laws to pondicherry state. in view of all these facts, the tribunal felt justified in invoking the provisions of pondicherry (taxation concessions) order, 1964, which permits the imposition of penalty lower than the minimum ..... co-operated with the department and voluntarily filed the account books, etc., which were in his custody. tax laws were also extended to pondicherry territory w.e.f. 1st april, 1963. according to cl. 16 of pondicherry (taxation concessions) order, 1964 notwithstanding anything contained in chapter xxi of the it act, 1961, the ito, ..... the minimum imposable for the asst. yr. 1965-66 (2) whether, on the facts obtaining in this case and having regard to the provisions of the pondicherry (taxation and concessions) order, 1964, the tribunal was within its powers to reduce the penalty below the minimum prescribed especially when such powers wasted with the .....