Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry extension of laws act 1968 section 5 extension of rules orders etc under certain laws Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 2 results (0.758 seconds)

Feb 26 1982 (HC)

Lekh Raj Vs. 4th Additional District Judge, Meerut and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1982All265

..... extension to cantonments of the same law which is in force in other parts of that very state ..... a special reason or purpose,' the same being the legislative policy of having uniform law on the subject in the whole of a particular state. further unlike the pondicherry legislature in the case of b. shama rao (air 1967 sc 1480) authorising extension of the law of a different state, the parliament in the instant case has authorised ..... where the cantonments are situate. in case of b. shama rao it had been emphasised that the pondicherry legislature could not predicate whether future amendments made by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2004 (HC)

Suresh Chandra Vs. Vice Chairman, Ghaziabad Development Authority

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2004)3UPLBEC2470

R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Sharma, learneed Counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.R. Mishra, learneed Counsel for the respondent, Ghaziabad Development Authority. 2. In this petition prayer has been made to quash the order dated 4.1.99 passed by respondent/Ghaziabad Development Authority and for writ of mandamus directing the respondent authority to regularise service of the petitioner from 1.1.88 to the class IV category i.e., to the post of peon or Security Guard and for payment of arrears of salary in the regular pay scale like other employees since the month of March, 1994.3. Brief facts necessary for adjudication of the writ petition are that the petitioner was deployed as a daily wager peon since 1.1.88 and had continued to work in the said capacity from time to time with break. He filed Writ Petition No. 34733 of 1992 claiming relief of reguiarisation and for granting the regular pay scale in view of the Government Order dated 21.10.1989 claiming that some juniors to ...

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1976 (HC)

Divisional Superintendent, Northern Railway and anr. Vs. R.B. Hanifi

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1977)ILLJ309All

..... void wholly or to the extent of the contravention as the case may be.16. again in b. shama rao v. the union tgrritory of pondicherry : [1967]2scr650 , it was stated that a law which has become totally void is non-existent and non-established. in similar strain was it observed in mahendra lal jaint v. state of u.p ..... grounds like limitation, the court should ordinarily refuse to issue the writ of mandamus for such payment.61. the writ of mandamus is a high prerogative writ of a most extensive remedial nature and is, in form, a command issuing from the high court, directed to any person, corporation, or inferior court, requiring him or them to do ..... as a norm annulled with retroactive force by the decision declaring it null ab initio, just as everything king midas touched turned into gold, everything to which the law refers becomes law, i.e., something legally existing.applying these principles, the effect of the decision of the supreme court in moti ram deka's case (supra) holding the said .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //