Pollute - Judgment Search Results

Mokha Light House Vs. Central Pollution Control Board

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1995(1)ARBLR540(Delhi); 57(1995)DLT650; (1995)110PLR32

contract entered into between M/s. Mokha Light House, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'the Contractor') and Central Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred to as 'the Employer') relating to construction of Central Boards Building Complex at Shahdara

Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board Vs. Ccl Products (India) Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 7005 of 2017 Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board Appellant(s) Versus CCL Products (India) Limited Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J12 Admit. This appeal

Delhi Pollution Control Committee versus Lodhi Property Co. Ltd. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025]8S.C.R.362

of the Air Act have to be read in light of the legal position on the application of Polluter Pays principle as formulated and explained - This means that State Board cannot impose environmental damages in case

Delhi Pollution Control Committee Vs. National Chemical and PharmA. En ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2001(4)SCALE231

ORDER1. The transfer petitions are allowed. Writ Petition Nos. 3270/1999 and 3596/ 1999 pending in the High Court of Delhi are transferred to this Court. 2. Let the matters be listed in the month of January...

Gujarat Pollution Control Board Vs. Nicosulf Industries and Export Pvt ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2009)1GLR889(SC); 2008(16)SCALE267; (2009)2SCC171

Acid as raw-materials, and during the course of the process of production they are discharging 10,800 litres of polluted water every day. Under Sections 24 and 25 of the Act, every industry is compulsorily required to obtain

U.P. Pollution Control Board Vs. Dr. Bhupendra Kumar Modi and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2009CriLJ1146(1); 2009(1)CTC84; (2009)2SCC147

of M/s Modi Carpets Ltd. was done by the officers of the Board wherein it was found that polluted trade effluent was being discharged into the river Sai through drain without any treatment and construction of effluent

U.P. Pollution Control Board and ors. Vs. Kothari Ferm. and Biochem Lt ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

ORDER1. Heard both sides.2. The petitioner-Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board has challenged the order passed by the Division Bench which permitted the respondent factory to run

A.P. Pollution Control Board Vs. Prof. M.V. Nayadu (Retd.) and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC812; JT1999(1)SC162; 1999(1)SCALE140; (1999)2SCC718; [1999]1SCR235; 1999(1)LC426(SC)

evolved in various international Conferences and to the concept of 'Sustainable Development', stated that the precautionary Principle, the Polluter-Pays Principle and the special concept of Onus of Proof have now emerged and govern the law in our

U.P. Pollution Control Board Vs. M/S. Mohan Meaking Ltd. and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000(1)ALD(Cri)738; [2000]101CompCas278(SC); 2000CriLJ1799; JT2000(3)SC466; 2000(2)SCALE532; (2000)3SCC745; [2000]2SCR566

effluents discharged by an industrial unit of a premier liquor processing company made the water in Gomti more polluted to impermissible levels. So the State Pollution Control Board ('the Board' for short) initiated proceedings for prosecuting M/s.

U.P. Pollution Control Board and ors. Vs. Kanoria Industrial Ltd. and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC787; (2003)180CTR(SC)402; 2001(128)ELT3(SC); JT2001(2)SC103; (2001)2MLJ36(SC); 2001(1)SCALE381; (2001)2SCC549; [2001]1SCR559; [2002]128STC26(SC); 2001(1)LC599(SC)

without modifications within three weeks.2. List soon thereafter. Direct Taxation - refund - Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act,1977 - claim of refund of amount paid by respondent as water cess under provisions of Act