Points - Judgment Search Results

Sharad L. Patel Vs. K.J. Chacko, 3rd Additional Income-tax Officer and ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1985)49CTR(Bom)131; [1986]159ITR791(Bom); [1986]25TAXMAN7(Bom)

pendse j 1 by this petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india the petitioner is challenging the...

Silicon Electricals Vs. C. Kurup, Superintendent Central Excise, and 9 ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1989(20)LC358(Bombay)

pendse j 1 heard shri taleyarkhan for the petitioners and shri sethna for the respondents 2 after arguments i felt...

Johnson and Johnson Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise and 2 ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1989(20)LC387(Bombay)

pendse j 1 heard shri desai for the petitioners and shri sethna for the respondents 2 it is not necessary...

Jayant Jairam Rohee Vs. Maharashtra Public Service Commission and Othe ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1986)IILLJ487Bom; 1986MhLJ426

pendse j 1 these three petitions filed under article 226 of the constitution of india can be conveniently disposed of...

Todi Properties Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (1985)14ITD119(Kol.)

..... deduction has not been correctly allowed consequently he set aside the assessments on the limited point that the income from house property should be determined after considering the actual municipal tax ..... plea taken by the assessee s counsel in the miscellaneous application that some of the points taken by the commissioner are contradictory could not be the subject matter of miscellaneous .....

Hindusthan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. R.P. Agarwalla and Brothers ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1986Cal403

..... defendants on further consideration of the paucity of evidence on the point that the said flat was not used for any other purpose ..... and which consideration again was the condition precedent mr dasgupta further pointed out that the rent of the said flat was kept at ..... accepted by or on behalf of defendant appellants it was further pointed out that the letters as disclosed now were really disclosed and .....

D.K. Mitra and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC1558; 1985(33)BLJR535; [1985(51)FLR329]; 1985(2)SCALE336; 1985Supp(1)SCC243; [1985]Supp1SCR818; 1985(2)SLJ598(SC)

..... considered for permanent appointment against permanent vacancies and the most meritorious were selected it is pointed out that this practice was terminated in the medical department of the railways after ..... position according to the quota of vacancies laid down for direct recruitment the respondents also point out that divisional medical officers were allowed to count seniority only from the date .....

Rajamallaiah Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1985KAR1802; 1985(2)KarLJ541

..... ft cannot foe cribbed cabined and confined within traditional and doctrinaire limits from a positivistic point of view equality is antithetic to arbitrariness infact equality and arbitrariness are sworn enemies ..... the statement of lord loreburn that no court has an absolving power viscount simon pointed out that it is not possible to release parties from their contractual obligations merely .....

Arkansas Vs. Mississippi

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the common arkansas mississippi boundary along the southerly limit of bordeaux point originated with the hardin point cutoff constructed by the united states army corps of engineers in 1942 ..... the composite description set forth hereinafter 4 the common arkansas mississippi state boundary looping bordeaux point between lee county arkansas and tunica county mississippi from the upper end of mhoon .....

Bhopal Stud and Agricultural Farm Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Indore

Reported in: (1985)14ITD93Indore

..... entitled to enjoy in equal shares the high court however rightly pointed out that the only property which the widows could have managed ..... refractories ltd s case supra the orissa high court has further pointed out that there was another limitation namely that the effect of ..... company and carrying on the business thereafter by coming together all point to the same direction that this was a common object .....