Skip to content


Points - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: points Year: 1978 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.062 seconds)
Aug 08 1978 (HC)

Kothari Auto Part Mfg. (P) Ltd. Vs. K.R. Pawar and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-08-1978

Reported in: (1979)ILLJ473Bom; 1979MhLJ425

pendse j 1 the question that falls for determination in these four petitions is the correct and true interpretation of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 1978 (HC)

R.M. Shah Vs. Bombay Port Trust and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-23-1978

Reported in: (1978)IILLJ263Bom

..... disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner as we will deal with this point a little later suffice it to say at this stage that ..... as the presenting officer at the enquiry we have not been pointed out any rule or regulation preventing the presence of such officer ..... an appellate authority over the enquiry officer it has also been pointed out that the chairman has not granted any stay of further .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 1978 (SC)

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-25-1978

Reported in: AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621

..... the reasons for impounding her passport despite request made by her we have already pointed out that the central government was wholly unjustified in withholding the reasons for impounding the ..... no extra territorial jurisdiction in foreign lands this is a naive misconception of the point pressed before us nobody contends that india should interfere with other countries and their sovereignty .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 12 1978 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Vs. Rasiklal Balabhai

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Oct-12-1978

Reported in: [1979]119ITR303(Guj)

..... the profits of which are assessable to tax 7 broadly two points would arise for answering the question referred to us namely i ..... though we will deal with a few absurdities which have been pointed out by the learned government pleader later on in his submission ..... that that partner is occupying the premises to contend while conceding the point viz the business of partnership is carried on by each of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 1978 (FN)

Regents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-1978

..... admissions committee the rating embraced the interviewers summaries the candidate s overall grade point average grade point average in science courses scores on the medical college admissions test mcat letters ..... sensible and certainly no constitutional distinction between for example adding a set number of points to the admissions rating of disadvantaged minority applicants as an expression of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 19 1978 (HC)

John Joseph Kummel Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-19-1978

Reported in: (1980)82BOMLR375; 1978MhLJ856

..... from which the period of limitation should run or commence in fact the said point is no longer in dispute in view of the decision of the supreme court ..... in s m vikal v a l chopra 1978crilj764 although the point was not raised there in the manner in which it has been raised before ..... sawant j 1 the point that falls for consideration in this appeal is within a narrow compass the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 25 1978 (HC)

State of Maharashtra Vs. Anderson Finn Kay Ove

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-25-1978

Reported in: 1978CriLJ1666

..... agency was empowered to make investigation under the customs act 1962 this point has recently been looked into by the division bench consisting of deshmukh ..... involved is roughly about rs 9 000 mr merchant is interested in pointing out that by way of personal penalty at the time of ..... under sub section 1 of section 377 and hence the point for determination is whether this is a valid appeal the decision .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 1978 (HC)

Jacob Harold Aranha and anr. Vs. Mrs. Vera Aranha and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-23-1978

Reported in: 1979CriLJ974

..... of process has been made out and iii for deciding the question purely from the point of view of the complainant without at all adverting to any defence that the accused .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 26 1978 (HC)

State of Maharashtra Vs. Shriram Hotel and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-26-1978

Reported in: 1979CriLJ271

..... the public analyst mr khatal patil also sought to support the order of acquittal by pointing out that what this court has held to be the mandatory requirements of rule 17 ..... was required to be kept in a sealed container referring to this the supreme court pointed out that the public analyst had to divide one third part sent to him into .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 15 1978 (HC)

State of Maharashtra Vs. Jawaharlal Shamlal Ujawane

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-15-1978

Reported in: 1979CriLJ530; 1979MhLJ50

..... not known what the protocols of tests applied were the report is silent on this point and so is the record in view of the provisions of rule 46 which are ..... could have been cross examined and the prosecution case could have been tested on this point also this was a lacuna which must militate against the prosecution rules 57 1 and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //