Skip to content


Planned Development - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: planned development Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 574 results (0.142 seconds)
Sep 30 2004 (HC)

Junjamma and ors. Vs. the Bangalore Development Authority, Rep. by Its ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-30-2004

Reported in: ILR2005KAR608; 2004(7)KarLJ677

..... relevant to note here that the acquisition of the lands is for the purpose of planned development of the area which includes both residential and commercial purposes that being the purpose of ..... which is situated within the green belt area for the formation of layout o comprehensive development plan planning authorities powers in respect of preparation of cdp green belt shown in cdp notwithstanding .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 07 2004 (HC)

Ram Chandra Kasliwal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-07-2004

Reported in: RLW2004(3)Raj1788; 2004(4)WLC17

..... relating to municipalities the jda act is mainly concerned with the planned development of the city the laying out of the roads and their ..... widening is incidental to the planned development of they city under section 101 of the jda act the ..... held that there was no inhibition in acquiring the land for planned development of delhi under the land acquisition act in stale of tamil .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 19 2004 (HC)

Sitala Prasad Jaiswal and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-19-2004

Reported in: (2005)2CALLT114(HC),2005(4)CHN376

..... this connection mr mitra referred to the various sections of the west bengal town country planning development act 1979 which are briefly summarised hereunder section 28 preparation of the present land use ..... south dum dum municipality not only ignored the provisions of the west bengal town country planning development act 1979 and the land use map prepared thereunder but also ignored the directions .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 01 2004 (SC)

Friends Colony Development Committee Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-01-2004

Reported in: AIR2005SC1; 2005(2)BomCR691; JT2004(9)SC418; 2005(I)OLR(SC)84; 2004(9)SCALE166; (2004)8SCC733; (2005)1UPLBEC598

..... it would encourage other builders to make similar violations much to the detriment of the planned development of the city laying challenge to the order of the appellate authority the builder filed ..... subordinated to the public good it can be stated in a way that power to plan development of city and to regulate the building activity therein flows from the police power of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 06 2004 (HC)

Munshi Ram Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Sep-06-2004

Reported in: AIR2005J& K25,2004(3)JKJ202

..... alleging gross and rampant violation of various statutory laws enacted by the state for planned development of the jammu city the complainants lamented inaction and indifference of the authorities saddled ..... meant to create avenues for the municipality to fill its chest the beneficiary of planned development envisaged by the relevant laws ultimately is the public not the municipality conversely if .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 22 2004 (HC)

Bhagyachandra Ramrakshamal Khatri and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra an ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-22-2004

Reported in: 2005(2)ALLMR244; 2005(2)BomCR622; 2005(2)MhLj71

..... in dispute that the petitioners have issued notice to the planning development authority dated 21st april 2004 requesting them to acquire the ..... years from the date on which a final regional plan or final development plan comes into force or if proceedings for the acquisition ..... proposal no 194 it is submitted that the above revised development plan was sanctioned by the state government on 4 12 1992 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2004 (HC)

Kali Dass Vs. Executive Officer, Municipality and anr.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Mar-11-2004

Reported in: 2005(2)JKJ63

..... that the construction which comes within the road alignment will have adverse affect on the planned development of the area the appellant was also not able to prove his ownership over the ..... finding by the tribunal that the construction in question amounts to serious violation affecting the planned development of the area that apart we have already held that the construction in question is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 25 2004 (HC)

O.P. Malik Vs. Mcd and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-25-2004

Reported in: AIR2005Delhi116; 115(2004)DLT148

..... of use premises being 136 in number 24 master plan development norms are to be found in clause 8 of the development code they would govern the population density housing norms ..... of the delhi development act 1957 construction is development the zonal development plan prepared under section 8 relates the zonal development plan to not only the site plan and use plan for the development of a zone .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 2004 (HC)

Shivalik Sahkari Avas Samiti Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-23-2004

Reported in: 2005(3)AWC2331; 2005(1)ESC625

..... for exempting the land without taking recourse to section 48 further once a sanctioned plan for planned development has been finalised the same amounts to enforcement of statutory provisions and which cannot ..... that the industrial area constituted under 1976 act has the authority to secure the planned development of an area for industrial commercial and residential purpose a perusal of section 12 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 10 2004 (HC)

Kailash NaraIn Agnihotri Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Nov-10-2004

Reported in: 2005(1)ESC31; (2005)1UPLBEC283

..... the petitioner does not arise 18 the relevant provisions of the uttar pradesh urban planning development amendment and validation ordinance 1985 hereinafter referred to as ordinance no 10 of 1985 ..... of employees on fulfillment of certain conditions 9 subsequently the uttar pradesh urban planning and development amendment and validation ordinance 1985 hereinafter referred to as the ordinance no 10 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //