Plan - Judgment Search Results

Bevit Pharmaceuticals Limited Vs. Planned Pharma Private Limited and a ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(1)BomCR314; (2002)4BOMLR273

s a bobde j 1 this petition is filed by bevit pharmaceuticals limited whose attempt to have the trade mark...

S.T. Sundaram Vs. Veerateswaran,

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2003)1MLJ353

..... statutory authorities from performing their statutory function when the authorities under the act sanctioned the planning permit in accordance with the provisions of the act 1969 and the construction has ..... been carried out by the petitioner by scrupulously following the sanctioned plan an advocate commissioner who is not well informed about the technicalities cannot by his .....

Tahoe-sierra Preservation Council, Inc. Vs. Tahoe Regional Planning Ag ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... development pending the adoption of a new regional land use plan the adoption of the 1984 regional plan hereinafter plan or 1984 plan did not however change anything from petitioners standpoint after the ..... environmental thresholds to be exceeded ibid thus the district court enjoined the 1984 plan because the plan did not comply with the environmental requirements of respondent s regulations and of .....

Ashok Madan Vs. Director Town and Country Planning Deptt.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 2002CriLJ4447

..... 1977 and 14 3 1978 respectively the interim development plan for shimla planning area was prepared under section 17 of the act ..... the petitioner that the case would be withdrawn after the plans are sanctioned in these circumstances the petitioner prays that in ..... magistrate section 38 of the himachal pradesh town and country planning act 1977 prescribes penalty for unauthorised development or for use .....

The Special Tahsildar (L.A.), Master Plan Complex, Virudhunagar Vs. Ka ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2002)3MLJ273

..... 1989 to 27 2 1990 the special tahsildar land acquisition master plan complex virudu nagar by award no 1 of 1990 dated 7 ..... was examined and for the state one venkatraman special tahsildar master plan complex gave evidence reference court mainly placing reliance on ex c ..... per cent only drawing the attention of this court to the plan the learned additional advocate general would contend that in fact that .....

Y. Markandeyudu and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Represented ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(2)ALD362; 2002(2)ALT1

..... service examination and accordingly notified its policy decision in g o ms no 316 finance planning f w admn i department dated 14th december 1988 prescribing the qualification of a pass ..... 6 the government of andhra pradesh by its subsequent g o ms no 154 finance planning fw admn i department dated 11 4 1991 having considered the representation of the andhra .....

Employees in Relation to the Management of Central Mine Planning and D ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2003(1)BLJR313; [2003(1)JCR409(Jhr)]; (2003)IILLJ1139Jhar

..... the central government ministry of labour whether the action of the management of central mine planning and design institute ltd regional institute no ii p o koyla nagar dist dhanbad in ..... vikramaditya prasad j 1 the petitioner management of the central mine planning design institute hereinafter called as cmpdi has filed this writ application for quashing the award .....

P. Saraswathamma and ors. Vs. Family Planning Association of India, My ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2004ACJ218; 2002(5)ALD94

to the hospital since there is no appeal by the insurance company 6 accordingly the civil miscellaneous appeal is allowed in

P. Saraswathamma and ors. Vs. Family Planning Association of India and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: III(2004)ACC122

to the hospital since there is no appeal by the insurance company 6 accordingly the civil miscellaneous appeal is allowed in

Rush Prudential Hmo, Inc. Vs. Moran

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s 504 523 1981 it was intended to ensure that plans and plan sponsors would be subject to a uniform body of ..... 142 1990 section 514 a was intended to ensure that plans and plan sponsors would be subject to a uniform body of benefits ..... of differing state regulations would complicate the administration of nationwide plans producing inefficiencies that employers might offset with decreased benefits fmc .....