Skip to content


Plain Error - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: plain error Sorted by: recent Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 326 results (0.167 seconds)
Dec 22 1995 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Mahmad @ Munno Usmanbhai Chauhan

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-22-1995

Reported in: (1996)2GLR821

issues except that of the identification parade which was the error the identification parade held was in consonance with law the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1995 (HC)

Bharat Electronics Ltd. Vs. Labour Court and Others

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-21-1995

Reported in: ILR1996KAR1395; 1996(5)KarLJ94

..... indicated that the tribunal did not find that there was any basic error or violation of the principles of natural justice in the holding of ..... textile mills v its workmen supra at pp 215 216 it is plain that whereas in cases failing under section 33 1 no action can ..... final in this view of the matter i do not find any error committed by the labour court in passing the impugned order i therefore .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1995 (HC)

Banyan and Berry Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-21-1995

Reported in: (1996)131CTR(Guj)127; [1996]222ITR831(Guj)

..... the revenue because the language of the deeds of settlement is plain and admits of no ambiguity justice s mukherjee said after noticing ..... as carrying on business in our opinion the tribunal was in error reliance on the principle of mcdowell s case supra was also ..... conclusion that the company intended to carry on business on the plain reading of the document in the facts and circumstances it was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1995 (HC)

Bridge and Roof and Co. (India) Ltd. and Union of India (Uoi) Vs. K.K. ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Dec-21-1995

Reported in: (1996)2CALLT269(HC)

to remedy the wrong and to do so is a plain exercise of judicial power and it ought not to shark

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1995 (HC)

Larsen and Toubro Limited, Ece Construction Group Vs. the Chief Inspec ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-21-1995

Reported in: (1996)1MLJ192

..... should be otherwise no such violent departure is called for by the plain words in proviso ii in any event as a matter of interpretation ..... exact meaning of the expression deemed the respondent has committed a serious error of law which vitiates its order 8 as already seen a ..... in all the provisos of the provisos section 100 1 and 2 plainly the use of the word deemed provided for a situation where .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1995 (HC)

Larsen and Toubro Limited, Ece Construction Group, Pondicherry Vs. the ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-21-1995

Reported in: [1996(73)FLR1125]; (1996)IMLJ192

..... should be otherwise no such violent departure is called for by the plain words in proviso ii in any event as a matter of interpretation ..... exact meaning of the expression deemed the respondent has committed a serious error of law which vitiates its order 8 as already seen a division ..... in all the provisos of the provisos sec 100 1 and 2 plainly the use of the word deemed provided for a situation where .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 1995 (HC)

Sheo Nandan Lal and ors. Vs. Jai Ram Lal and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Dec-20-1995

to the root of the case if a person being plaintiff denies his signature on the plaint and the vakalatnama itself brothers during the life time of parbat lal is an error of record commenting on the document ext c mr prasad

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 1995 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kiritkumar S. Sheth and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-20-1995

Reported in: 1997ACJ1103; [1998]93CompCas125(Guj); (1997)1GLR824

of medical practitioners towards their patients is invoked by the plaintiff for compensation it is very clear that if a person prescription of dr the trial court has committed a serious error in straightaway accepting the unsupported testimony of the plaintiff and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 19 1995 (HC)

Sanghvi Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-19-1995

Reported in: ILR1996KAR384

..... basis that the learned advocate has submitted that the commissioner was in error in having interfered with the order wherein the appeals had been ..... could not have recorded a finding against the plaintiff on a plain reading of section 15 y of the sebi act revision was ..... court could not have recorded a finding against the plaintiff on a plain reading of section 15 y matter remanded to trial court 1 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 19 1995 (HC)

Smt. Sk. Khasim Bee Vs. the State Election Commissioner and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-19-1995

Reported in: AIR1996AP324; 1996(1)ALT76

..... in a crusader s spirit but in discharge of a duty plainly laid upon them by the constitution 8 while considering the validity ..... provision of an act affecting the election is challenged or where error in exercising such jurisdiction or mala fides or non compliance of ..... called in questions could be raised at an earlier stage and errors if any are rectified there will be no meaning in enacting .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //