Plain Error - Judgment Search Results

ishvar Dadu Patil Vs. Gajabai Babaji Patil

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR782

..... is vested by survivorship at the time of the adoption as it is plainly our duty to give effect to it if it still appears to ..... v sitaram was also a case of an undivided family and it is plain that their lordships were considering and did consider the widow s right ..... the opposite conclusion would in my opinion be to fall into a similar error of interpretation as in the case of the judgment of the privy .....

Lal Chand Marwari Vs. Ramrup Gir

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR855

..... the high court have in these suits pointed out the plaintiff s error yet in another part of their judgment if their lordships are not ..... far as he is concerned a very serious positior it is made plain by the plaint that as against him the defendants had at the ..... indian limitation act for bringing the present suits that he was in error in interpreting the finding of the courts in the prior suits to .....

Matthews Vs. Huwe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... declining to allow a writ of error to or an appeal from a lower state court unless it plainly appears on the face of the ..... supreme court of the state though lacking jurisdiction through writ of error taken as of right had discretionary power to review the ..... taxes and assessments to enjoin the county treasurer the defendant in error from collecting assessments made and levied on these lands for the .....

New York ex Rel. Woodhaven Co. Vs. Public Svc. Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

dismiss the grounds asserted are that since the writ of error issued june 5 1923 the company has laid mains to

Louisville and Nashville R. Co. Vs. Sloss-sheffield Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a well considered dissenting opinion pointing out that defendant in error had suffered no proximate damage and therefore ought not to ..... from southern pacific co v darnell taenzer co points out plainly enough that there can be no recovery without proximate damage ..... the defense of no damage at birmingham alabama defendant in error accepted a written proposition made by the chicago foundry machine .....

Central Union Tel. Co. Vs. City of Edwardsville

Court: US Supreme Court

tel co 309 ill 482 483 484 but counsel for plaintiff in error insist that it is for this court to 13 1925 decided november 23 1925 269 u s 190 error to the supreme court of the state of illinois syllabus

Kansas City Structural Steel Co. Vs. Arkansas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to the subcontractor by a dealer we think it plain that the plaintiff in error did business of a local and intrastate character in ..... part of the work sublet had been completed plaintiff in error had made certain shipments of steel consisting of reinforcing rods ..... transactions local to arkansas were contemplated in fact plaintiff in error obtained permission to do business in arkansas in order to .....

Western Union Tel. Co. Vs. Georgia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... from the state the difference between that case and this is plain a mere authority to test disputed rights by a suit does ..... alleged contracts and protect all its constitutional rights the plaintiff in error shows no law impairing the obligation of contracts and therefore no ..... 156 ga 409 the case is brought here by writ of error on the ground that the statutes warranting these proceedings impaired the .....

Arkansas Ex Rel. Utley Vs. St. Louis-san Francisco Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... more than 50 held that the judgment of the state court plainly did not deny the authority or question the validity of the ..... suits consolidated in the trial court were brought by plaintiff in error in the chancery court for the western district of craighead county ..... and affirmed the judgment below 162 ark 443 the plaintiff in error invokes the jurisdiction of this court under judicial code 237 alleging .....

Enrique Del Pozo Y Marcos Vs. Wilson Cypress Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in the sense of being not reviewable by this court on writ of error or appeal and 241 provided that page 269 u s 88 the ..... is well taken a reference to the questions presented and to what is plainly shown in the record will make this clear the appellants seek to ..... before the patent issued which was in 1895 but the record is plainly otherwise it contains a certified copy of the original plat of the .....