Placement - Judgment Search Results

Delhi Transport Corporation vs.m/s Abc Placement Services (Regd.) & A ...

Court: Delhi

..... through mr jyotindra kumar mr a k verma advocates m 8587815809 versus m s abc placement services regd anr through mr m taiyab khan advocate m respondent 9312222450 coram justice prathiba ..... findings in the preceding paragraphs i allow the claim of the applicant m s abc placement services regd for an amount of rs 1066186 rupees ten lakhs sixty six thousand one .....

Delhi Transport Corporation vs.m/s Chirag Security & Placement Servic ...

Court: Delhi

..... mr jyotindra kumar mr a k verma advocates m 8587815809 versus m s chirag security placement services through mr malaya chand advocate m respondent coram justice prathiba m singh981050525 prathiba m ..... the preceding paragraphs i allow the claim of the applicant m s chirag security and placement services regd for an amount of rs 561523 rupees five lakhs sixty one thousand five .....

Delhi Transport Corporation vs.m/s Delhi Driver Placement Services Pvt ...

Court: Delhi

..... mr jyotindra kumar mr a k verma advocates m 8587815809 versus m s delhi driver placement services pvt ltd eb respondent through mr malaya chand advocate m coram justice prathiba m ..... in the preceding paragraphs i allow the claim of the applicant m s delhi drivers placement services pvt ltd for an amount of rs 18 06 833 rupees eighteen lakhs six .....

Delhi Transport Corporation vs.m/s Neel Kanth Placement Services (Regd ...

Court: Delhi

..... transport corporation petitioner through mr jyotindra kumar advocate m 9971588963 versus m s neel kanth placement services regd through none respondent coram justice prathiba m singh prathiba m singh j oral .....

Delhi Transport Corporation vs.m/s Competent Placement Services (Regd. ...

Court: Delhi

..... delhi transport corporation petitioner through mr jyotindra kumar advocate m 9971588963 versus m s competent placement services regd anr through none respondents coram justice prathiba m singh prathiba m singh j .....

Heritage Personnel Placement Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)(111)ECC86

2 the assessee is in appeal aggrieved by the order in revision passed by the commissioner of central excise amp...

Pleasant Township Vs. Aetna Life Ins. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

pleasant township v aetna life ins co 138 u s 67 1891 u s supreme court pleasant township v aetna...

Phoolchand Ahirwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

phoolchand ahirwar versus state of m p ors writ petition no 17332 16 10 2012 shri anil upadhyay counsel for...

Phoolchand Sahu Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

phoolchand sahu versus state of m p others writ petition no 2428 22 2 2013 shri k k gautam learned...

Dr. A.K. Roy and ors. Vs. the President, Icar and anr.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Reported in: (2003)(2)SLJ342CAT

..... the case of o a 1199 97 supra there are different norms for placement and promotion placement in the senior scales requires apart from eligible service consistently satisfactory performance ..... that while consistently satisfactory performance appraisal reports would be sufficient for the purpose of placement in senior scale consistently good performance appraisal reports are essential in order that .....