Phoolchand Ahirwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Phoolchand Ahirwar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 16, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042091

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042091
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 16, 2012
Subject: Banking

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Banking

Key legal issue: Banking

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Phoolchand Ahirwar

Advocate Shri. Anil Upadhyay

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

phoolchand ahirwar versus state of m.p.& ors.writ petition no.17332 ”16. 10.2012: shri anil upadhyay, counsel for the petitioner. shri piyush dharmadhikari, government advocate for respondent/state. petitioner is working as a constable in district tikamgar and by the impugned order dated 14.7.2012 he has been transferred to district damoh. challenge to the order of transfer is made on the ground of personal inconveniences of the petitioner due to certain ailment of his wife and that of his son. grounds raised by the petitioner are personal inconveniences of petitioner which prohibits him from carrying out order of transfer and on such consideration as judicial review of an administrative order of transfer is not permissible, i am not inclined to interfere into the order of transfer. accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recours.of departmental remedy available the writ petition is disposed of. (rajendra menon) judge ss/-

Full Judgment

Phoolchand Ahirwar versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.17332 ”

16. 10.2012: Shri Anil Upadhyay, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

Petitioner is working as a Constable in District Tikamgar and by the impugned order dated 14.7.2012 he has been transferred to District Damoh.

Challenge to the order of transfer is made on the ground of personal inconveniences of the petitioner due to certain ailment of his wife and that of his son.

Grounds raised by the petitioner are personal inconveniences of petitioner which prohibits him from carrying out order of transfer and on such consideration as judicial review of an administrative order of transfer is not permissible, I am not inclined to interfere into the order of transfer.

Accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recouRs.of departmental remedy available the writ petition is disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Phoolchand Ahirwar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Banking