Perfect - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Perfect Stoneware Pipes

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2002)(80)ECC543

1 revenue filed these appeals against the common order in appeal passed by the commissioner appeals 2 when the case...

Perfect Equipments (P) Ltd. Vs. Prestige Enterprises

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(2)ALLMR978; 2003(2)BomCR640; (2003)1CompLJ72(Bom); [2003]44SCL74(Bom)

orderd y chandrachud j 1 admit counsel for the respondent waives services by consent taken up for hearing and final...

Perfect Commodity Impex Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(161)ELT316Tri(Mum.)bai

1 this is an application for the stay of operation of the impugned order the applicant imported heavy melting scrap...

Barnhart Vs. Peabody Coal Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of initial assignment or otherwise that would assure an initial system that is as near perfect as possible but abstain from future adjustments that upset expectations and render sales of companies ..... health benefits even if that miner had worked for other signatory operators that should in perfect fairness share the responsibility the reality is that the coal act reflects a compromise between .....

Konda Lakshmana Bapuji Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1012; 2002(2)ALD56(SC); JT2002(2)SC253; 2002(1)SCALE584; (2002)3SCC258; [2002]1SCR651

..... it raises bona fide dispute of title 5 whether the respondent perfected title by adverse possession 6 whether the respondent is a land ..... so he was entitled to tack their possession for purposes of perfecting his title by adverse possession even otherwise from the date of ..... his own coming into possession in 1954 he perfected his title by adverse possession as against the first respondent the .....

State of Karnataka and ors. Vs. M. Muniraju

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2002Kant287; ILR2002KAR2923; 2003(1)KarLJ291

..... by the society alternatively it is pleaded that the plaintiff has perfected his title by adverse possession by virtue of long and ..... the courts below were right in holding that the plaintiff had perfected his title by adverse possession on the mere statement that ..... title interest upon the suit schedule property and they have neither perfected their title by adverse possession as claimed by them or they .....

Lee Vs. Kemna

Court: US Supreme Court

..... at the appropriate time lee would have had an opportunity to perfect his plea to hold the case over until the next ..... note after listing the components of a continuance motion contemplates subsequent perfection if the court shall be of the opinion that the affidavit ..... of appeals later pressed nor is there any indication that formally perfect compliance with the rules would have changed the trial court s .....

Syed Allabaksh and ors. Vs. Zainab Bi and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(3)ALD333

..... are to be divided additional issue 12 whether the 1st defendant perfected his title to items 1 and 6 of the plaint schedule by ..... law which arises for consideration is whether the 1st defendant has perfected his title by adverse possession in the facts and circumstances of the ..... proof of ouster or a specific denial of title resulting in perfection of title by one of the co owners as against all the .....

Duraisamy, Vs. N. Ethirajulu,

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2003)1MLJ369

..... were ousted it is also denied that the first defendant had perfected title by adverse possession the conduct of the first defendant manifestly ..... is void and cannot be enforceable that the trial court was perfectly correct in decreeing the suit filed by the plaintiffs and ..... has got to be brushed aside thus the lower court was perfectly correct in holding that the eight children of thirumalai ammal were .....

Smt. Phool Kumari (Since Deceased) Through L. Rs. and ors. Etc. Vs. Na ...

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2003HP75

..... signing and dating the judgment is regarded by law as an act perfecting the judgment both order 20 rule 3 order 41 rule 31 of ..... it was further held that so long as a judgment is not perfected by signing it it would appear that it can always be withdrawn ..... was not a mere formality it is an act which makes the judgment perfect and complete mere pronouncement of the judgment had not the effect of .....