Payment Of Wages Act 1936 Section 24 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: payment of wages act 1936 section 24 Court: karnataka Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 449 results (2.191 seconds)Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs. the Deputy Labour Commi ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-04-2010
the matter the proceedings initiated by the third respondent under payment of gratuity act for determination of gratuity must fail and per annexure d of the controlling authority under payment of wages act as well as the order dated 28 2 2009 proceedings initiated by the third respondent under payment of gratuity act for determination of gratuity must fail and the amount paid and reinstated the third respondent to report to duty on 24 2 2008 under divisional establishment order dated 26 2 2008
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Nagarathnamma Vs. M. Bantaiah and Others.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-11-2010
Reported in : ILR2010KAR4030
stamped this provision crates any doubt as regard to the payment of stamp duty as the nature of transaction being mortgage against held as per section 2 j of the stamp act it is clear that every document and record created or compulsory requires stamp duty to be paid in terms of section 34 of the act the judgment relied on by the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. R. Krishna Murthy, S/O Ramaswamy. Vs. the State of Karnataka by Its ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-04-2010
the second respondent it was returned with an endorsement stop payment hence he field a private complaint in pcr no 560 cr p c read with sec 138 of negotiable instruments act the trial court alter taking cognizance of the offence had b sreenivase gowda j this crl p is field under section 482 cr p c praying that this hon ble court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri T.S. Shrinivas, S/O Sri T.K. Subramanyam, Aged About 39 Years. and ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-20-2010
municipal council is eligible for bca bcb bcb w categories acting contrary to what they have said in their statement of hesitation in holding that it is done in accordance with section 42 2 a of the karnataka municipalities act 1964 and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Srinivasa Reddy S/O Subbanna Vs. Sri D.Ramappa S/O Doddadyavappa
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-23-2010
the valid objections of the plaintiff has committed an irrational act 4 sri k v narasimhan learned counsel appearing for the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Joint Commissioner for Transports and the Asst. Regional Transport ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-03-2010
demand notice came to be sent to the owner demanding payment of tax on the vehicle he approached the appellate authority came to be tiled before the appellate authority under the act and the same came to be dismissed on 8 12 chellur k govindarajulu jj this writ appeal is filed under section 4 of the karnataka high court act praying to set
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDoddegowda Vs. the Assistant Commissioner, Mysore Sub-division and anr ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-05-2010
Reported in : 2010(3)KarLJ78
not shown and also nothing has been mentioned as to payment of rent gutta to the landlord etc and also no be registered in his favour since the karnataka land reforms act 1961 came into effect from 1973 74 if the petitioner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Vaishnavi Enterprises and ors Vs. Vijaya Bank
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-04-2010
natural justice granted six months time to the petitioners for payment of entire amount the drt also directed that in case effect would be to defeat the very object of sarfaesi act be that as it may since the petitioners have got
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRegional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Lakshmamma, W/O ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-29-2010
at 6 p a from the date of petition till payment and to set aside the same this mfa is filed u s 173 1 of mv act against the judgment and award dated 03 03 2006 passed they have filed a claim petition before the tribunal under section 166 of m v act claiming compensation of 8 00
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPuttaraju S/O Kikeregowda, and ors Vs. State of KamatakA. and thespl.L ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-02-2010
relating to the entitlement of the petitioner for his rightful action for compensation that he is entitled and in such entitlement 10324 2010 filed under order 22 rule 4 r w section 151 of cpc for bringing the legal representatives of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT