Pattern - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. Hughes Properties, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

united states v hughes properties inc 476 u s 593 1986 u s supreme court united states v hughes properties...

Krishna K. Puthran and ors. Vs. Shrikrishna B. Jadhav and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1986(2)BomCR705

a d tated j 1 this revision application is directed against the order of acquittal passed by the learned additional...

Philip Lukka Vs. Franciscan Association, Vazhappally and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1987Ker204

sukumaran j 1 this is a plaintiffs appeal it is directed against the judgment of the sub court kottayam by...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sakil Ahmed

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1988]172ITR498(Cal)

ajit kumar sengupta j 1 in this reference under section 256 1 of the income tax act 1961 at the...

Arcara Vs. Cloud Books, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

arcara v cloud books inc 478 u s 697 1986 u s supreme court arcara v cloud books inc 478...

Sarat Chandra Patra Vs. Narasingha Patra and anr.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1988Ori4; 63(1987)CLT86

orders c mohapatra j 1 the facts giving rise to this civil revision are as follows on 14 5 1966...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Purkha Ram.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (1986)56CTR(Raj)264

orders k mal lodha j the income tax appellate tribunal jaipur bench jaipur for short the tribunal has referred the...

Kanthammal Vs. Bysani Sriramulu Chetti and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1987)1MLJ300

srinivasan j 1 though the question involved in the appeal has turned out to be one within a narrow cumpass...

Thornburg Vs. Gingles

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the revealed correlation statistically significant and was the difference in black and white voting patterns substantively significant the district court found that blacks and whites generally preferred different ..... in the proposed requirement that plaintiffs demonstrate that racial animosity determined white voting patterns under the old intent test plaintiffs might succeed by proving only that a .....

Bazemore Vs. Friday

Court: US Supreme Court

..... array of evidence to support their contention that the extension service engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination with respect to salaries in addition to their own regression ..... officials do not assign persons to a particular program there is no state controlled attendance pattern discriminatory or otherwise to undo or redraw thus unlike elementary and secondary education affirmative .....