Skip to content


Patents Amendment Act 2005 Section 12 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: patents amendment act 2005 section 12 Court: jharkhand Page 1 of about 328 results (1.405 seconds)
Aug 02 2005 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Maklu Mahto and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2006Jhar78; [2006(2)JCR357(Jhr)]

..... enunciated in the letters patent appeal debi prasad was no longer good law in view of the amended provisions of section 100a of the code ..... to another bench as provided in clause 10 of the letters patent 12 there is no denying the fact that the provisions of ..... admission on 9th august 2005 at the top clause 10 of letters patent and coal bearing areas acquisition amp development act 1957 present appeals .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 2006 (HC)

Central Coalfields Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : (2007)6VST614(Jharkh)

..... which are liable to tax under section 12 1 of the bihar finance act 1981 entry of goods shall mean ..... to obtain the sanction of the president for the amending act reliance was also placed on a supreme court ..... better conduct of its business and paying not patently much more than what is required for providing ..... of 2003 3457 of 2004 4128 of 2005 4199 of 2005 further declaration has been sought for that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 2006 (HC)

Central Coal Fields Ltd. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR94(Jhr)]

..... which are liable to tax under section 12 1 of the bihar finance act 1981 entry of goods shall mean ..... to obtain the sanction of the president for the amending act reliance was also placed on a supreme court ..... better conduct of its business and paying not patently much more than what is required for providing ..... of 2003 3457 of 2004 4128 of 2005 4199 of 2005 further declaration has been sought for that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 29 2003 (HC)

Ganesh Singh and anr. Vs. Bishram Singh and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR527(Jhr)]

relevance what was prohibited was the preferring of a letters patent appeal after the amending provision came into force it was right of appeal can be taken away by a retrospective amendment of the concerned statute conferring the right of appeal but appeal under section 5 ii of the kerala high court act as in that case was in any manner affected by that decision shows that that was a case to which section 6 of the general clauses act had no application the state government and does not come within meaning of article 12 of constitution writ petitions against federation is not maintainable this

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 13 2008 (HC)

Tata Steel Limited and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(3)JCR365(Jhr)]

..... and manner prescribed 12 various other sections of the vat act 2005 have been amended however it is worth to mention here that no amendment has been made in sections 12 15 to 21 ..... facially and patently show that the levy of entry tax is compensatory in nature for the following reasons i the preamble of the act after amendment by 2007 amendment act says that value added tax act is an act to provide .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 29 2000 (HC)

Umashankar Singh Vs. Md. Siddique Alam and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2001(49)BLJR297

allowing the amendment similarly the order allowing the amendment being patently erroneous and totally in violation of the principle contained in therefore recourse to section 15 is permissible either asking for amendment of the plaint on defaults posterior to the filing of defaults and is not paying rent section 15 of the act is good enough for protection of the plaintiff for securing till the date he was ordered to deposit rent under section 15 of the act this amendment was allowed by the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 02 2005 (HC)

Dhananjay Mahto and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2005(4)JCR1(Jhr)]

..... sections 2 and 3 of amended ordinance 1987 sections 10 and 11 of bihar panchayat raj act 1947 were amended ..... 100 reservation seems to be patently unanswerable by the amended provisions of the ordinance in ..... circumstances by order dated 8th august 2005 allowed the state government to complete the ..... narayanpur blocks within the district of jamtara 12 sahebganj boriyo taljhari rajmahal barharwa pathna and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 31 2015 (HC)

Ms Acc Ltd Through Dr Arun Kumar Saxena Vs. Mines and Geological Surve ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... amendment act 2015 are extracted below section 8 a 5 notwithstanding anything contained in sub section 2 3 and sub section ..... 02 01 2015 and 05 10 2015 are patently erroneous for calculating the amount for the minerals ..... the price of minerals dispatched between 30 09 2005 to 15 09 2014 from the lime stone ..... to the petitioner for filing rejoinder affidavit 12 post the matter after six weeks the parties .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 10 2005 (HC)

Manoj Kumar Vs. Smt. Meera Agarwal and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : I(2006)DMC140; [2005(4)JCR340(Jhr)]

..... letters patent appeal it had expressly done so in section 100 a of the code of civil procedure introduced in the code by the amending act ..... narayan agarwal and anr v state bank of india and ors 2005 3 jcr 1 jhr fb wherein the aforesaid issue fell for ..... of state government and does not come within meaning of article 12 of constitution writ petitions against federation is not maintainable lal submitted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 06 2008 (HC)

Sapan Kumar Burman and Vs. Rajan Kumar Shrivastab and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR2722; [2008(3)JCR735(Jhr)]; (2009)IIILLJ669Jhar

..... month by the amended act of 2005 10 it is manifest from the above that the act applies to wages ..... interfere in cases where impugned order suffer from patent illegality which if not interfered would cause serious ..... also implies that a petition under section 15 of the act cannot be entertained by the court ..... that it would cause prejudice to the petitioners 12 the learned court below has though considered .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //