Patents Amendment Act 2005 Section 12 - Judgment Search Results

J. Mitra and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asst. Controller of Patents and Desig. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC366(SC); LC2008(3)31; 2008(38)PTC6(SC); 2008(11)SCALE524; (2008)10SCC368

..... amended sections 116 and 117a were not brought into force 12 without giving effect to the amendments to sections 116 and 117a suggested by section 47 of the patents amendment act 2002 on 4 4 2005 the legislature enacted the patents amendment act 2005 .....

Span Diagnostic Vs. Assistant Controller of Patents and Design and anr ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : LC2009(1)22; 2008(37)PTC56(Del)

..... of the principal act i e the patents act 1970 as amended vide amendment act of 1999 continued to be operative notwithstanding the enactment of the patent amendment act 2002 and the patent amendment act 2005 since section 47 of the amendment act of 2002 which .....

Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR896; 2009(111)BomLR479

..... wto thereafter the patents amendment act 15 of 2005 was brought into force by way of ordinance namely patents amendment ordinance 2005 dated 26 12 2004 and ultimately was enacted as the patents amendment act 2005 which has made ..... the said provisions section 11 b of the act provides for compulsory examination of the claims for patents by the examiner section 12 of the act provides for reference .....

Glaxo Smith Kline Plc and ors. Vs. Controller of Patents and Designs a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW376; AIR2009SC1147; 2008(4)AWC3839(SC); 2008BusLR879(SC); (SCSuppl)2008(4)CHN197; LC2008(3)131; (2009)2MLJ548(SC); 2008(38)PTC1(SC); 2008(12)SCALE284; 2008(6)LHSC4364.

..... to costs intellectual property rights patents exclusive marketing right grant of effect of amending act patents act 1970 section 21 and 78 of patent amendment act 2005 section 6 of the general clauses act 1897 writ petitioners filed an ..... a learned single judge had set aside the order dated 28 12 2004 passed by the controller of patents and designs in short the controller and remanded the matter to .....

Novartis Ag and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in three stages and finally by the patents amendment act 2005 section 5 was altogether deleted from the parent act patents act 1970 between january 1 1995 and january 1 2005 the patents act 1970 underwent wide ranging changes but ..... as a convention country as per section 133 of the act on november 30 1998 12 in 1997 when the appellant filed its application for patent the law in india with regard .....

Novartis Ag Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in three stages and finally by the patents amendment act 2005 section 5 was altogether deleted from the parent act patents act 1970 between january 1 1995 and january 1 2005 the patents act 1970 underwent wide ranging changes but if ..... to it or not p 9 para 16 he also quoted from michel 12 with approval as under patent systems are not created in the interest of the inventor but in the .....

Novartis Ag Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary and Others

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... for the reasons of prior publication as above iii not patentable under section 3 d of the patents act 1970 as amended by the patents amendment act 2005 the patent application claims only a new form of a known substance ..... we know there are possibilities of number of other forms in which it can exist xii 1993 patent covers gleevec the beta form of imatinib mesylate thus anticipated r 4 r 6 and .....

Ucb Farchim Sa Vs. Cipla Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : LC2010(1)278

..... under section 25 1 of the patents act 1970 patents act 2 before discussing the facts of the individual cases the scheme of the patents act particularly after the amendment to the relevant provisions by way of patents amendment act 2005 amendment act as ..... scc 433 para 6 at pages 437 438 paras 8 9 at page 439 para 12 at page 441 karnataka chemical industries v union of india 2000 10 scc 13 para .....

Bajaj Auto Ltd., State of Maharashtra Rep. by S. Ravikumar Vs. Tvs Mot ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ726Mad; LC2008(1)217; 2008(36)PTC417(Mad)

..... by the patents amendment act 2005 act 15 of 2085 with effect from 01 01 2005 prior to the said amendment section 2 m defined patent as patent means a patent granted under this act 29 the ..... section 13 4 of the patents act 1970 also deals with the examination of applications for patent prescribed under section 12 it is necessary to reproduce sections 12 and 13 of the act which are as follows section 12 .....

Novartis AG represented by It's Power of Attorney Ranjna Mehta Dutt Vs ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)4MLJ1153

..... granting the patent or rejecting the patent application by giving reasons prior to the amended section was brought into the statute book by the patent amendment act 2005 act 15 2005 with effect from 01 01 2005 it was ..... criteria but it only explains the amended section itself debates in parliament could not be the basis for interpreting the statute is their last submission 12 in the light of the .....