Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 150 security for costs Sorted by: recent Year: 2023 Page 1 of about 107 results (1.842 seconds)

Dec 20 2023 (HC)

Mohammed Noman Ahmed Almeri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-20-2023

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.15631 OF2023(GM RES) BETWEEN: MOHAMMED NOMAN AHMED ALMERI AGED47YEARS R/AT No.88, 3RD CROSS AREKERE LAKSHMI LAYOUT IIMB POST, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU 560 076. ... PETITIONER (BY MR.RAHAMATHULLA KOTHWAL, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF OVERSEAS INDIA AFFAIRS NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110 001. 2 . THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI 110 001. Page No.1 is re-typed and re-placed vide Chamber order dated 21.12.2023. 2 3 . FOREIGNERS REGIONAL REGISTRATION OFFICER BMTC BUS STAND, 5TH FLOOR 'A' BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING KH ROAD, SHANTI NAGAR, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560 027. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN, DSGI) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IND...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2023 (HC)

Smt. Sharadha L Dodmani Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-20-2023

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023 R BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.47144 OF2018(S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. SHARADHA L.DODMANI AGED ABOUT35YEARS W/O SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL BADAMI, BAGALKOT DISTRICT 587 201. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI VINAY S.KOUJALAGI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU 560 001. REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY2. TOWN MUNICIPALITY COUNCIL BADAMI, BAGALKOT DISTRICT 587 201. REPRESENTED BY CHIEF OFFICER3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DISTRICT TOWN MUNICIPAL CELL BAGALKOT 587 201. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V.S.KALASURMATH, HCGP FOR R1 AND R3; SRI PRAKASH HOSAMANE, ADVOCATE FOR R2) Page No.1 is retyped and replaced vide Chamber order dated 11.07.2024 2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE2D RESPONDENT DATED2707.2018 VIDE ANE...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2023 (SC)

Mohammed Abdul Wahid Vs. Nilofer

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-14-2023

REPORTABLE2023INSC1075IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.________OF2023(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.14445 of 2021) MOHAMMED ABDUL WAHID APPELLANT(S) Versus NILOFER & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT SANJAY KAROL, J.Leave Granted.2. In adjudicating this appeal, the thought to be borne foremost in mind is that every trial is a search of truth. This purpose is succinctly captured in the following terms in American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, 2007: The purpose of trial is to determine the validity of the allegations. The objective is to secure a fair and impartial administration of justice between the parties to the litigation and not the achievement of a hearing wholly free from errors. Once a civil action has been instituted and issue is joined upon the pleadings, there must be a trial on the issue before a judgment may be rendered. Trial is not a contest between lawyers but a presentation of facts to which the law may be applied ...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2023 (SC)

Afjal Ansari Vs. State Of Up

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-14-2023

REPORTABLE2023INSC1071IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.3838 Of 2023 (Arising out of Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.11129 Of 2023) Afjal Ansari .Appellant(s) versus State of UP .Respondent(s) JUDGEMENT SURYA KANT, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 24.07.2023, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (hereinafter, High Court), partially allowing the application filed by the Appellant under Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter, CrPC), for the stay on the sentence and conviction, awarded by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, MP/MLA Court, Ghazipur (hereinafter, Trial Court) vide judgement and order dated 29.04.2023. The High Court, has through the impugned order, Page 1 of 19 suspended the Appellants sentence and granted him bail but the stay on conviction has been declined. FACTS:3. At this juncture, it is imperative to delve into the factual matrix to set out ...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 2023 (SC)

Cox And Kings Ltd. Vs. Sap India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-06-2023

2023 INSC1051Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL / APPELLATE JURISDICTION Arbitration Petition (Civil) No.38 of 2020 Cox and Kings Ltd. Petitioner Versus SAP India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Respondents With SLP (C) No.8607 of 2022 And With SLP (C) No.5833 of 2022 1 JUDGMENT Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Table of Contents A. The reference ........................................................................................................ 4 B. Submissions .......................................................................................................... 7 C. Legal background ................................................................................................ 16 i. India .................................................................................................................. 16 a. Chloro Controls ............................................................................................. 20 b. Development of Law after Chloro Controls ..........

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 06 2023 (SC)

Lombardi Engineering Limited Vs. Uttarakhand Jal Vidyut Nigam Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-06-2023

REPORTABLE2023INSC976IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION No.43 OF2022LOMBARDI ENGINEERING LIMITED PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UTTARAKHAND JAL VIDYUT NIGAM LIMITED RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.:1. This is a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Act 1996) filed at the instance of a company based in Switzerland and engaged in the business of design consultancy seeking appointment of an arbitrator for the adjudication of disputes and claims emanating from the Contract dated 25.10.2019 entered into between the petitioner and respondent i.e., Uttarakhand Vidyut Nigam Limited (a wholly owned corporation of the Government of Uttarakhand). 1 FACTUAL MATRIX2 The petitioner is a design consultancy firm based in Switzerland, having its registered office at Via Del Tiglio 2, PO Box 934, CH934 CH6512 Bellinzona-Guibiasco, Switzerland and local Indian address at B3/61, 1st Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, D...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 2023 (SC)

M.a. Biviji Vs. Sunita

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2023

REPORTABLE2023INSC938IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3975 OF2018M.A Biviji APPELLANT(S) VERSUS Sunita & Ors. RESPONDENT(S) With CIVIL APPEAL No.4847 OF2018And CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2023(Arising out of Diary No.21513 OF2018 JUDGMENT Hrishikesh Roy, J.Delay condoned.2. The Civil Appeals have been filed under Section 23 of The Consumer Protection Act, 1986, (hereinafter referred to as the, Act, 1986) assailing the impugned decision passed on 16.02.2018 by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter, NCDRC) in Consumer Case No.48 of 2005 filed by Mrs. Sunita Parvate. The NCDRC directed Suretech Hospital and Research Page 1 of 42 Centre Private Limited, a Hospital in Nagpur, Dr. Nirmal Jaiswal, Chief Consultant and Intensive Care Unit In-charge, at Suretech Hospital, Dr. Madhusudan Shendre, ENT Surgeon at Suretech Hospital, and Dr. M. A. Biviji, Radiologist at Suretech Hospital to jointly and severally pay Rs. 6,11,638/- as compens...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2023 (SC)

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-17-2023

Reportable 2023 INSC920IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No.1011 of 2022 Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. Petitioners Versus Union of India Respondent With Writ Petition (Civil) No.93 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.5 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.8 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.9 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.11 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.12 of 2023 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.1020 of 2022 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.1105 of 2022 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.1141 of 2022 1 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.1142 of 2022 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.1150 of 2022 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.159 of 2023 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.129 of 2023 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.260 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.6 of 2023 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.319 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.7 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.10 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.13 of 2023 And with Writ Petition (Civil) No.478 of 2023 2 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrac...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 2023 (SC)

C.i.t.,delhi Vs. Bharti Hexacom Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-2023

REPORTABLE2023INSC917IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11128 OF2016C.I.T., DELHI ....APPELLANT(S) VS. BHARTI HEXACOM LTD. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4902/2022 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 162/2018 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 159/2021 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4839/2017 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 153/2021 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 6897/2018 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S)._ _______of 2023 (@ SLP (C)_________OF2023(@DIARY NO(S). 4178/2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). ________of 2023 (@ SLP(C) No.24740/2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). ________of 2023 (@ SLP(C) No.20863/2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 158/2021 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 302/2021 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 303/2021 1 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11149/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11148/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11130/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11131/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11134/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11132/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11136/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11133/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11135/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11137/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11140/...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 2023 (HC)

Rashmitha Karkera N Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-12-2023

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT APPEAL No.305 OF2023(GM-CC) C/W WRIT APPEAL No.300 OF2023(GM-CC) WRIT APPEAL No.337 OF2023(GM-CC) WRIT APPEAL No.482 OF2023(GM-CC) WRIT APPEAL No.591 OF2023(GM-CC) WRIT APPEAL No.886 OF2023(GM-CC) WRIT APPEAL No.939 OF2023(GM-CC) IN WA No.305 OF2023BETWEEN:1. . NARENDRA BABU G.V. S/O K.V. VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/AT GUDIBANDE TOWN, A BLOCK HOUSING BOARD COLONY CHIKKABALLAPUR-561 209. 2 . YALLAPPA BAGALI S/O RAVUTAPPA AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/AT CHIKKABEVANUR INDI TALUK, VIJAYAPURA - 586 211. 2 3 . VANI R S W/O SUBRAMANI B G AGED ABOUT34YEARS R/A CHINNAMMA LAYOUT1T CROSS, CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI R T NAGAR POST HEBBALA, BENGALURU - 560 032. 4 . CHAITHRA A.J.W/O BASAVARAJU B N AGED ABOUT30YEARS R/A18HONGIRANA17H CROSS17H MAIN ROAD ANDRAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 091. 5 . ASHWINI S., W/O PRAKASH T T AGED ABOUT...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //